What's new

Muslim population grows up to almost 1.6 Billion.

Large population has many aspects to it. If the nation is not developed, it will cause a drain a drain on the resources.

Taking your example, you will need people to build what the scientist has invented/designed. Need someone to grow the food, the whole downstream of distribution. Build roads and houses. All the activities you can think about.


If its a nation of slackers, it will be a drain for the lack of productivity.

and these very slackers can be made to work like slaves..even those imprisioned can be made to work 24 hrs with meagre food & off days..these things can happen in totalatarian regimes..no am not talking abt Inda ,BD Pakz here these are democratic countries...
 
Large population has many aspects to it. If the nation is not developed, it will cause a drain a drain on the resources.

Taking your example, you will need people to build what the scientist has invented/designed. Need someone to grow the food, the whole downstream of distribution. Build roads and houses. All the activities you can think about.


If its a nation of slackers, it will be a drain for the lack of productivity.


You have to consider the resources as well. With limited resources we will only get wars. What do you think why are these wars are happening in the world? one of the main causes of it is limited resources, so the countries are fighting over it.
 
You have to consider the resources as well. With limited resources we will only get wars. What do you think why are these wars are happening in the world? one of the main causes of it is limited resources, so the countries are fighting over it.

population has nothing to do with limited resources. the americans blame rising population in africa for resource wars, but 1 american eats more than 10 blacks in africa.
 
population has nothing to do with limited resources. the americans blame rising population in africa for resource wars, but 1 american eats more than 10 blacks in africa.

Please stop using racially offensive language my friend. You say Americans. You could as easily have said Africans instead of blacks in Africa. You would then be the first to take umbrage were anyone here to start commenting on the intercanthal folds specific to your race. Please understand.
 
German Population Plunge “Irreversible,” Federal Stats Office Admits
Expected that one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families by 2025


By Gudrun Schultz

0,1020,967647,00.jpg


BERLIN, Germany, November 9, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Germany’s downward spiral in population is no longer reversible, the country’s federal statistics office said Tuesday. The birthrate has dropped so low that immigration numbers cannot compensate.

“The fall in the population can no longer be stopped,” vice-president Walter Rademacher with the Federal Statistics Office said, reported Agence France-Presse.

Germany has the lowest birthrate in Europe, with an average of 1.36 children per woman. Despite government incentives to encourage larger families, the population is dropping rapidly and that trend will continue, with an expected loss of as much as 12 million by 2050. That would mean about a 15 percent drop from the country’s current population of 82.4 million, the German news source Deutsche Welle reported today.

The low birthrate will cause the German population to age dramatically over the next 40 years--last year there were 144,000 more deaths than births, and that number could increase to 600,000 by 2050, the FSO forecast stated.

With a 22 percent reduction in the workforce and increasing costs for senior assistance and medical care, the drop in population is expected to have a radical impact on the nation’s economy, along with the welfare budget.

“I wouldn’t like to use the word ‘bankrupt’ because it’s a major challenge for the social insurance systems, that’s for certain,” Radermacher said in an interview with DW-Radio. “But the first thing is to reform the social insurance systems…We can learn from other countries…In every case, you need someone who has to work and give you some earnings.”

“The projections tell us the development of demographic trends will be even more dramatic in the eastern part of Germany,” Radermacher said . “This is because of the fertility rates in the eastern part of Germany, because of internal migration with the borders of Germany and many other demographic factors.”

While immigrants are increasingly relied upon to compensate for low birth rates in European countries, Radermacher said even factoring in a projected annual influx of 100,000-200,000 migrants won’t prevent the population plunge.

“Even those people who are immigrants adopt after a couple years the lifestyle and the number of children per family. So the assumption that immigrants will stick to their habits is simply not true.”

Germany has one of the largest populations of Muslim immigrants in Western Europe, with a Muslim community of over 3 million. That trend is expected to continue, leading some demographic trend-watchers to warn that the country is well on the way to becoming a Muslim state by 2050, Deutsche Welle reported.

The Brussels Journal reported last month that one third of all European children will be born to Muslim families by 2025. There are an estimated 50 million Muslims living in Europe today--that number is expected to double over the next twenty years.

The population losses faced by Germany reflect a trend occurring across Europe--The European Union’s statistics agency Eurostat has predicted an overall drop in Europe’s population of 7 million people by 2050.

The demographic decline coincides with a dramatic drop in Christian religious belief and a consequent rejection of Christian morality and emphasis on the benefits of family life and children.

German Population Plunge “Irreversible,” Federal Stats Office Admits
 
population has nothing to do with limited resources. the americans blame rising population in africa for resource wars, but 1 american eats more than 10 blacks in africa.

Well thats the first time i hear that population has nothing to do with limited resources. the africasn dont eat enough because they dont have enough to eat, they are dying from hunger. i am sure the resources in africa is limited.
 
Please stop using racially offensive language my friend. You say Americans. You could as easily have said Africans instead of blacks in Africa. You would then be the first to take umbrage were anyone here to start commenting on the intercanthal folds specific to your race. Please understand.

blacks is not an offensive word i think. negro on the other hand is.

i purposely said blacks, as there ARE white africans in south africa that eat far better than their black compatriots.
 
Well thats the first time i hear that population has nothing to do with limited resources. the africasn dont eat enough because they dont have enough to eat, they are dying from hunger. i am sure the resources in africa is limited.

they don't have the capability to manufacture food.

productivity is not linear with population, it is exponential, assuming technology is more or less equal between countries. african countries are in the stone age so they can't compare, and besides they're separated and fighting between each other.

this is why the muslim world is also not going to be powerful without being united. it can have 5 billion people and it'll still show no improvement because muslims are fragmented and fight against each other.
 
incorrect. our lifespan reached over 70 in 1970's, something india struggles with even today. we had less starvation in 1970 than india does today.

i was not the one talking about india being pathetic. don't attack china, and i will not attack india, it's that easy.

I was merely pointing out the drawbacks of your regime enforced one-child policy sir, and you well know that. We in India in the 70s briefly had a gentleman who tried to forcefully impose something like that too. Didn't go down very well here. Of course we are a free democracy, which means the freedom to procreate and the freedom to decide for ourselves when we have enough. Maybe it will change somewhere down the line. Demographic trends often do. But you will not find party officials with scissors standing behind every virile male when that happens.
 
Lets get one misconception straight , Muslims have over 62 Countries and they have 73% of the oil & gas and other energy resources of this planet so people should stop arguing about the resources because Islam is spread in all continents and not in a nutshell.

 
i hope you will have more than 19 children.........than i see wht quality u have given to them

Hmmm what am I going to name'em ? I can have my own soccer , cricket, or about three basketball teams :D.

But on a practical note, my dumbest child will have more brains than you....
 
I was merely pointing out the drawbacks of your regime enforced one-child policy sir, and you well know that. We in India in the 70s briefly had a gentleman who tried to forcefully impose something like that too. Didn't go down very well here. Of course we are a free democracy, which means the freedom to procreate and the freedom to decide for ourselves when we have enough. Maybe it will change somewhere down the line. Demographic trends often do. But you will not find party officials with scissors standing behind every virile male when that happens.

it didn't go down well because indians do not have the discipline necessary to run an industrialized society. many indian individuals are superstitious and selfish; the net effect is to create a disorderly society.

i don't want to tell stories because individual behavior never represents group behavior.

but as support for my claim, india is higher on all measures of social instability: poverty, rich-poor difference, crime, number of armed insurgencies, male-female difference in literacy and wealth, urban-rural difference in literacy and wealth, etc.

the key for indians to learn, is to wear a condomn.
 
blacks is not an offensive word i think. negro on the other hand is.

i purposely said blacks, as there ARE white africans in south africa that eat far better than their black compatriots.

Blacks on its own is not racially offensive. Black as a modifier to African on the other hand most definitely is, especially looking at the example you quote and the preceding segregational cues it denotes. Ask any South African, black or white, if what you said was offensive or not. Even if we may not have too many here.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom