What's new

Muslim kids denied Admission in Delhi

Yes you are indirectly asking Muslims to go for Arms because you have always denied Muslims their rights in India buy thinking making one Muslim a president you have given them rights is the biggest joke of the century and Muslims were part of India so why should they come to Pakistan why should not grab India and make another Pakistan from India
we made a mistake by not sending the entire Muslim population to Pakistan in 1947 though i do not wish for that, and in modern times we gave them all that is needed for survival and reservation perks for students comming from Kashmir, etc. and for that you guys will ask for another country from INDIA.
i have a good number of Muslim friends here in INDIA, you know what all are succesfull doctors, enginers, enterpruners. where as in Pakistan only a few dozen people own the land of Pakistan and the rest are working as slaves for them. Muslims in INDIA are way good in their living standards when compared to their counter parts in Pakistan
 
.
Just compare the literacy rate of Muslims of India with the Muslims of Pakistan ,,,, u will find the Muslims of Pakistan on the dumb side as compare to Indian Muslims . i lived in Dubai for 2 years now settled down in India . During my stay in Dubai I came across a lot of Pakistanis but its quite sad to see their level of education is so poor and far from reach of Indian standards.
Most of them can't even write an application letter for their leave. Although they are graduates from their country --lolz.

Being an Indian Muslim i have studied in one of the best institutions right from my junior level till My Mtech in computer engineering without any discrimination and strictly on merits as an eligibility.

Before peeping bout wats going across the border plzzz check ur own literacy rate and educational standards which is no where near to india

Jai Hind
 
.
Yes you are indirectly asking Muslims to go for Arms because you have always denied Muslims their rights in India buy thinking making one Muslim a president you have given them rights is the biggest joke of the century and Muslims were part of India so why should they come to Pakistan why should not grab India and make another Pakistan from India

You are a well known atankwadi here arguing for genocide of ahemadis.It may be well above your mental grade but

This is Indian bill of rights.

Article 12 {Definition}

In this Part, unless the context otherwise required, "the State" includes the Governmental and Parliament of India and the Government and the Legislature of each of the States and all local or other authorities within the territory of India or under the control of the Government of India.The expression "state" in the context of the indian.


Article 13 {Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights}

1.All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void.

2.The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void.

3.In this article, unless the context otherwise required, -
"law" includes any Ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having in the territory of India the force of law;

4."laws in force" includes laws passed or made by a Legislature or other competent authority in the territory of India before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed, notwithstanding that any such law or any part thereof may not be then in operation either at all or in particular areas.

5.Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under article 368.

Article 14 {Equality before law}

The State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India.

Article 15 {Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth}

1.The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them.

2.No citizen shall, on ground only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them, be subject to any disability, liability, restriction or condition with regard to -
access to shops, public restaurants, hotels and places of public entertainment; or
the use of wells, tanks, bathing ghats, roads and places of public resort maintained whole or partly out of State funds or dedicated to the use of general public.

3.Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any special provision for women and children.

4.Nothing in this article or in clause (2) or article 29 shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes.

Article 16 {Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment}

1.There shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating to employment or appointment to any office under the State.

2.No citizen shall, on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence or any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of, any employment or office under the State.

3.Nothing in this article shall prevent Parliament from making any law prescribing, in regard to a class or classes of employment or appointment to an office under the Government of, or any local or other authority within, a State or Union territory, any requirement as to residence within that State or Union territory prior to such employment or appointment.

4.Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State.

(4A) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from making any provision for reservation in matters of promotion to any class or classes of posts in the services under the State in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes which, in the opinion of the State, are not adequately represented in the services under the State.

Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any law which provides that the incumbent of an office in connection with the affairs of any religious or denominational institution or any member of the governing body thereof shall be a person professing a particular religion or belonging to a particular denomination.

Article 17 {Abolition of Untouchability}

"Untouchability" is abolished and its practice in any form is forbidden. The enforcement of any disability arising out of "Untouchability" shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.

Article 18 {Abolition of titles}

1.No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State.

2.No citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State.

3.No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State.

4.No person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.

Article 19 {Protection of certain rights regarding freedom of speech, etc.}

a.All citizens shall have the right -
b.to freedom of speech and expression;
c.to assemble peaceably and without arms;
d.to form associations or unions;
e.to move freely throughout the territory of India;
f.to reside and settle in any part of the territory of India; and
g.*** (repealed)
h.to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.

Nothing in sub-clause (a) of clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the State from making any law, in so far as such law imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality, or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.

Nothing in sub-clause (b) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order, reasonable restrictions on the right conferred by the said sub-clause.

Nothing in sub-clause (c) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far
as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India or public order or morality, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause.

Nothing in sub-clause (d) and (e) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of any of the rights conferred by the said sub-clauses either in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Schedule Tribe.

Nothing in sub-clause (g) of the said clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it imposes, or prevent the State from making any law imposing, in the interests of the general public, reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred by the said sub-clause, and, in particular, nothing in the said sub-clause shall affect the operation of any existing law in so far as it relates to, or prevent the State from making any law relating to, -
the professional or technical qualifications necessary for practicing any profession or carrying on any occupation, trade or business, or
the carrying on by the State, or by a corporation owned or controlled by the State, of any trade, business, industry or service, whether to the exclusion, complete or partial, of citizens or otherwise.

Article 20 {Protection in respect of conviction for offenses}

1.No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence, not be subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence.

2.No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.

3.No person accused of any offence shall be compelled to be a witness against himself.

Article 21 {Protection of life and personal liberty}

No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.

Article 22 {Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases}

1.No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice.

2.Every person who is arrested and detained in custody shall be produced before the nearest magistrate within a period of twenty-four hours of such arrest excluding the time necessary for the journey from the place of arrest to court of the magistrate and no such person shall be detained in custody beyond the said period without the authority of a magistrate.

Nothing in clauses (1) and (2) shall apply -

1.to any person who for the time being is an enemy alien; or

2.to any person who is arrested or detained under any law providing for preventive detention.

No law providing for preventive detention shall authorize the detention of a person for a longer period than three months unless -
an Advisory Board consisting of persons who are, or have been, or are qualified to be appointed as, Judges of a High Court has reported before the expiration of the said period of three months that there is in its opinion sufficient cause for such detention: Provided that nothing in this sub-clause shall authorise the detention of any person beyond the maximum period prescribed by any law made by Parliament under sub-clause
of clause (7); or

such person is detained in accordance with the provisions of any law made by Parliament under sub-clauses (a) and (b) of clause (7).
When any person is detained in pursuance of an order made under any law providing for preventive detention, the authority making the order shall, as soon as may be, communicate to such person the grounds on which the order has been made and shall afford him the earliest opportunity of making a representation against the order.

Nothing in clause (5) shall require the authority making any such order as is referred to in that clause to disclose facts which such authority considers to be against the public interest to disclose.
Parliament may by law prescribe -
the circumstances under which, and the class or classes of cases in which, a person may be detained for a period longer than three months under any law providing for preventive detention without obtaining the opinion of an Advisory Board in accordance with the provisions of sub-clause (a) of clause (4);

the maximum period for which any person may in any class or classes of cases be detained under any law providing for preventive detention; and
the procedure to be followed by an Advisory Board in an inquiry under sub-clause (a) of clause (4).

Article 23 {Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour}

Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law.
Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory service for public purposes, and in imposing such service the State shall not make any discrimination on ground only of religion, race, caste or class or any of them.

Article 24 {Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc.}

No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous work.

Article 25 {Freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion}


Subject to public order, morality and health and to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion.

Nothing in this article shall affect the operation of any existing law or prevent the State from making any law -

regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular activity which may be associated with religious practice;

providing for social welfare and reform or the throwing open of Hindu reli- gious institutions of a public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.

[Explanation I: The wearing and carrying of kirpans shall be deemed to be included in the profession of the Sikh religion.]

[Explanation II: In sub-Clause (b) of clause (2), the reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jaina or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accord

Article 26 {Freedom to manage religious affairs}

Subject to public order, morality and health, every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right -

1.to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
2.to manage its own affairs in matters of religion;
3.to own and acquire movable and immovable property; and
4.to administer such property in accordance with law.

Article 27 {Freedom as to payment of taxes for promotion of any particular religion}

No person shall be compelled to pay any taxes, the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.

Article 28 {Freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or religious worship in certain educational institutions}

No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of State funds.

Nothing in clause (1) shall apply to an educational institution which is administered by the State but has been established under any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institution.

No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto.

Article 29 {Protection of interests of minorities}

Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same.

No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

Article 30 {Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions}

All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice.

1A. In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority, referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause.

Article 31 {Compulsory acquisition of property}

Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978, s. 6 {...}

Article 31A {Saving of laws providing for acquisition of estates, etc.}

Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law providing for -
the acquisition by the State of any estate or of any rights therein or the extinguishment or modification of any such rights, or

the taking over of the management of any property by the State for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of the property, or
the amalgamation of two or more corporations either in the public interest or in order to secure the proper management of any of the corporations, or

the extinguishment or modification of any rights of managing agents, secretaries and treasurers, managing directors, directors or managers of corporations, or of any voting rights of share-holders thereof, or

the extinguishment or modification of any rights accruing by virtue of any agreement, lease or licence for the purpose of searching for, or winning, any mineral or mineral oil, or the premature termination or cancellation of and such agreement, lease or licence,

shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19: Provided that where such law is a law made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent:

Provided further that where any law makes any provision for the acquisition by the State of any estate and where any land comprised therein is held by a person under his personal cultivation, it shall not be lawful for the State to acquire any portion of such land as is within the ceiling limit applicable to him under any law for the time being in force or any building or structure standing thereon or appurtenant thereto, unless the law relating to the acquisition of such land, building or structure, provides for payment of compensation at a rate which shall not be less than the market value thereof.

In this article, -
the expression "estate" shall, in relation to any local area, have the same meaning as that expression or its local equivalent has in the existing law relating to land tenure in force in that area and shall also include -
any jagir, inam or muafi or other similar grant and in the States of Tamil Nadu and Kerala, any janmam right;
any land held under ryotwari settlement;
any land held or let for purposes of agriculture of for purposes ancillary thereto, including waste land, forest land, land for pasture or sites of buildings and other structures occupied by cultivators of land, agricultural labourers and village artisans;
the expression "rights", in relation to an estate, shall include any rights vesting in a proprietor, sub-proprietor, under-proprietor, tenure-holder, raiyat, under-raiyat or other intermediary and any rights or privileges in respect of land revenue.

Article 31B {Validation of certain Acts and Regulations}
Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions contained in article 31A, none of the Acts and Regulations specified in the Ninth Schedule nor any of the provision thereof shall be deemed to be void, or even to have become void, on the ground that such Act, Regulation or provision is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by, any provisions of this part, and notwithstanding any judgment, decree or order of any court or tribunal to the contrary, each of the said Acts and Regulations shall, subject to the power of any competent Legislature to repeal or amend it, continue in force.
[edit]Article 31C {Saving of laws giving effect to certain directive principles}
Notwithstanding anything contained in article 13, no law giving effect to the policy of the State towards securing all or any of the principles laid down in Part IV shall be deemed to be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with, or takes away or abridges any of the rights conferred by article 14 or article 19; and no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to such policy: Provided that where such law is made by the Legislature of a State, the provisions of this article shall not apply thereto unless such law, having been reserved for the consideration of the President, has received his assent.
Article 31D {Saving of laws in respect of anti-national activities}
Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 2. {...}

Article 32 {Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part}

The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed.
The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part.
Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clauses (1) and (2), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause (2).
The right guaranteed by this article shall not be suspended except as otherwise provided for by this Constitution.

Article 32A {Constitutional validity of State laws not to be considered in proceedings under article 32} Rep. by the Constitution (Forty-third Amendment) Act, 1977, s. 3. {...}
[edit]Article 33 {Power of Parliament to modify the rights conferred by this Part in their application to Forces, etc.}

Parliament may, by law, determine to what extent any of the rights conferred by this Part shall, in their application to, -
the members of the Armed Forces; or
the members of the Forces charged with the maintenance of public order; or
persons employed in any bureau or other organisation established by the State for purposes of intelligence or counter intelligence; or
persons employed in, or in connection with, the telecommunication systems set up for the purposes of any Force, bureau or organisation referred to in clauses (a) to (c), be restricted or abrogated so as to ensure the proper discharge of their duties and the maintenance of discipline among them.

Article 34 {Restriction on rights conferred by this Part while martial law is in force in any area}

Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Part, Parliament may by law indemnify any person in the service of the Union or of a State or any person in respect of any act done by him in connection with the maintenance or restoration or order in any area within the territory of India where martial law was in force or validate any sentence passed, punishment inflicted, forfeiture ordered or other act done under martial law in such area.

Article 35 {Legislation to give effect to the provisions of this Part}

Notwithstanding anything in this Constitution, -
Parliament shall have, and the Legislature of a State shall not have, power to make laws -
With respect to any of the matters which under clause (3) of article 16, clause (3) of article 32, article 33 and article 34 may be provided for by law made by Parliament; and
for prescribing punishment for those acts which are declared to be offences under this part, and Parliament shall, as soon as may be after the commencement of this Constitution, make laws for prescribing punishment for the acts referred to in sub-clause (ii);
any law in force immediately before the commencement of this Constitution in the territory of India with respect to any of the matters referred to in sub-clause (i) of clause (a) or providing for punishment for any act referred to in sub-clause (ii) of that clause shall, subject to the terms thereof and to any adaptations and modifications that may be made therein under article 372, continue in force until altered or repealed or amended by Parliament.
[Explanation: In this article, the expression "law in force" has the same meaning as in article 372.]

Care point out where and how are muslims discriminated.

Would be even better if you post text of hudood laws and blasphemy law.It would be wonderful proving land of pure being less discriminatory than land of kaffirs.
 
.
we made a mistake by not sending the entire Muslim population to Pakistan in 1947 though i do not wish for that, and in modern times we gave them all that is needed for survival and reservation perks for students comming from Kashmir, etc. and for that you guys will ask for another country from INDIA.
i have a good number of Muslim friends here in INDIA, you know what all are succesfull doctors, enginers, enterpruners. where as in Pakistan only a few dozen people own the land of Pakistan and the rest are working as slaves for them. Muslims in INDIA are way good in their living standards when compared to their counter parts in Pakistan
You are not giving them anything you are taking everything and by the way Muslims lived india same as you have so they will prefer to separate their land and create a complete new country for 180 million India Muslims and it will happen soon
 
.
There are Many other religious groups like Sikhs,Zoroastrians etc in India .............Check their Literacy rates ...........If the Muslim Community in India Focus more on Education no one can stop them from getting there Share..................
 
.
You are not giving them anything you are taking everything and by the way Muslims lived india same as you have so they will prefer to separate their land and create a complete new country for 180 million India Muslims and it will happen soon

Yaar.. pehle apni country bachao.. Ek Northern areas was the only place where bomb blasts and killings were not happeneing.. Now even that has started.. Aapka apna ghar jal raha hai aur aapko doosre ke ghar mein kaun sa ghee use hota hai, uski chinta ho rahi hai.. :lol:
 
.
You are not giving them anything you are taking everything and by the way Muslims lived india same as you have so they will prefer to separate their land and create a complete new country for 180 million India Muslims and it will happen soon

for your idocracy, I think my muslim brother from another mother Mr faizahmad has given you a good post. Yet if you think that Mulims will fight for a new land in INDIA, let them ask for it. Until then keep your whining to yourself
 
. .
You are not giving them anything you are taking everything and by the way Muslims lived india same as you have so they will prefer to separate their land and create a complete new country for 180 million India Muslims and it will happen soon

Sorry --- we don't want a differnt country as indian is our motherland and till death we will remain loyal to this country . for next thousand years there will be no breed like jinnah which will exist in this blessed land .
 
.
You are a well known atankwadi here arguing for genocide of ahemadis.It may be well above your mental grade but

This is Indian bill of rights.



Care point out where and how are muslims discriminated.

Would be even better if you post text of hudood laws and blasphemy law.It would be wonderful proving land of pure being less discriminatory than land of kaffirs.


Your Indian Bill of rights are not worth the paper they are written on if they don't protect the rights of minorities.
 
. .
You are not giving them anything you are taking everything and by the way Muslims lived india same as you have so they will prefer to separate their land and create a complete new country for 180 million India Muslims and it will happen soon

I see greater chance for independent Baluchistan & Sindudesh & NWFP joining back with AF.
 
.
Just compare the literacy rate of Muslims of India with the Muslims of Pakistan ,,,, u will find the Muslims of Pakistan on the dumb side as compare to Indian Muslims . i lived in Dubai for 2 years now settled down in India . During my stay in Dubai I came across a lot of Pakistanis but its quite sad to see their level of education is so poor and far from reach of Indian standards.
Most of them can't even write an application letter for their leave. Although they are graduates from their country --lolz.

Being an Indian Muslim i have studied in one of the best institutions right from my junior level till My Mtech in computer engineering without any discrimination and strictly on merits as an eligibility.

Before peeping bout wats going across the border plzzz check ur own literacy rate and educational standards which is no where near to india

Jai Hind

Thank You Brother.................
 
.
So you got the Muslims in a catch 22.

You dont let them get in Schools and also don't let other Muslims open school just for Muslims.

Anyone can open school if it follows Govt rules and as far as I know in Kerala, the minority school can reserve certain number of seats for students belonging to that religion.
 
.
So you got the Muslims in a catch 22.

You dont let them get in Schools and also don't let other Muslims open school just for Muslims.
when a lot of post has been made in favour of the Government policy to open minority schools is posted you go after the one and only post that is written out of ignorance as your proof. This is the reason Pakistan has not improved. I think your base of thinking is corropted for over 60 years and it will be real hard to change this attitude for looking only the bads.
Have you heared about the 3 monkeys of Gandhi, if you follow that you and your country will get prosporous.
3%20monkeys.jpg
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom