What's new

Moral policing: Indian govt goes after ****, makes ISPs ban sites

**** is wrong and should be banned, I am glad I got 6 Lakh sites banned here. I shall forward that list to Indian government too, along with the list of 8000 proxies I got banned here
 
Correlation does not imply causation.If you have any knowledge in the field of statistics You should know this better.

That is correct when you look at only a single correlational study and if it was only correlational studies that come to the same conclusion. I simply gave a single correlational study as an example.

When you have multiple correlational studies showing the same thing like the one I stated before along with other studies like that of William Marshall (1989) confirming that rapists and child molesters accessed pornography far more than men who weren't sexual offenders it raises serious questions regarding the damaging effects of pornography (though you are right it doesn't necessary prove that it is the result of ****). However, the findings of those correlational studies are better understood when we examine non-correlational studies like Malamuth and James Check (1981), Charles Mullin and Daniel Linz (1995) along with reports like the "Social science consensus at Surgeon Generals Workshop on Pornography and Public Health" (1987) all of which confirm that **** portraying even mild sexual aggression as pleasurable resulted in men seeing violence and the use of coercion against women as more acceptable.

Your problem with feminism is not our issue.Please know that Dr Manning was just expressing his opinion.Actually this opinion came from an organization called Center for Research on Marriage and Religion run by a bunch of Conservative Christians.

I have no problem with the majority of feminist goals I stated what I did in quotation marks for others who might be interested in reading some of Warren Farrell's books and articles disproving the lies of Western feminist groups (ex. FEMEN).

So you totally discount what Dr. Jill Manning testified to at the US Senate because of the organization she is with? Before you do that read her testimony because she makes it a point to cite empirical evidence from peer reviewed journals not just her own personal opinions.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/thf_media/2010/pdf/ManningTST.pdf
Furthermore, her testimony isn't simply confined to how pornography negatively effects marriages but also how it impacts men's perception of women, the idea of marriage and engaging in healthy relationships with their female counterparts, etc... which is what Warren Farrell has extensively written on as well.


If any society feels that it needs **** than there is something wrong with the people living in it.
 
Well, this will affect my immigration process to India. I think I may have to choose a different country to immigrate to now.
 
Stupid government , They block only 39 websites expect this move controls child pornography . There are millions of websites & proxies who provides child pornography.
 
**** is wrong and should be banned, I am glad I got 6 Lakh sites banned here. I shall forward that list to Indian government too, along with the list of 8000 proxies I got banned here

I am sure a lot of members here would like to meet you in person and express their gratitude
 
We Lankans know the pain. Anyway, you can use proxies but you will be very frustrated. ;)
 
Great news, PTCL, who I contacted, have blocked proxfree.com and many other youtube proxies.

I'm a genius :D
 
Back
Top Bottom