What's new

Kashmir 'NEVER Merged' with India | CM Omar Abdullah

It is disputed according to the UN. That's border between Pakistan and India in Kashmir is called Line of control. Baluchistan doesn't share any of such feature. Since it is occupied it is disputed. :)

After Shimla, UN is irreverent and India doesn't recogonize UN resolution anymore.
It is called LOC because India claims P-O-K and GB. The day Pakistan hands over P-O-K and GB, we can have IB.
There is basically no difference between Baluchistan and Kashmir. India has better claim over Kashmir as it has instrument of accession. What has Pakistan got regarding Baluchistan?
 
Dude, FATA is not even part of this universe..... we transcend space and time altogether. :lol:

Pakistanis laws aren't applicable in FATA because of British time FCR laws and article 247.
 
After Shimla, UN is irreverent and India doesn't recogonize UN resolution anymore.
It is called LOC because India claims P-O-K and GB. The day Pakistan hands over P-O-K and GB, we can have IB.
There is basically no difference between Baluchistan and Kashmir. India has better claim over Kashmir as it has instrument of accession. What has Pakistan got regarding Baluchistan?

Lol only according to self defined definitions of Indian trolls like you aren't going to change the facts buddy. UN resolutions still exist and that makes whole of Kashmri state disputed. This is your self created definition. And the best part is your definition as childish and stupid as your claim on Kashmir.

About Baluchistan I don't know why I should answer your idiotic question when there is no parallel between IOK and Baluchistan. At least bring something comparable to save your sh!t.

And that includes morons like you because you seem to love Indian media!! :P :rofl:

I am just doing my duty of informing you morons about the news meant for you that you might have missed.

Look moron read this news. It was published for you. ;)
 
Why you want to avoid comparison of accession papers of both Kashmir and Kalat. which exist in case of Kashmir and don't exist in case of Kalat.

Don't want to compare apples and oranges. In any case those bogus papers were signed by a controversial illegal ruler. Don't hold much worth even if they exist.

While in our case Kalat annexation is globally accepted. :)
 
Don't want to compare apples and oranges. In any case those bogus papers were signed by a controversial illegal ruler. Don't hold much worth even if they exist.

While in our case Kalat annexation is globally accepted. :)

Princely state like Chitral, Swat, Bahawalpur, Khairpur many others acceded in also acceded to Pakistan in the same way by signing paper like Kashmir signed for India, you can't selectively call one as bogus and other as authentic:laughcry: The annexation of Kalat didn't went well Pakistan even there was other dispute it.
 
Princely state like Chitral, Swat, Bahawalpur, Khairpur many others acceded in also acceded to Pakistan in the same way by signing paper like Kashmir signed for India, you can't selectively call one as bogus and other as authentic:laughcry: The annexation of Kalat didn't went well Pakistan even there was other dispute it.

Chitral, Swat, Khairpur, Bahawalpur etc etc aren't disputed territory. Kashmir is.

Kalat annexation went down much better than your bogus accession papers of Kashmir. If those papers had any worth or validity you wouldn't have just 55% of erstwhile Kashmiri state today.
 
Kashmir is much more integrated into India than FATA is with Pakistan.

joke of the century...

the people of FATA are a proud and autonomous people but they aren't opposed to Pakistan or being part of Pakistan

that's more than we can say about Kashmir vis a vis hindustan --- and events of the past 24 hours show that
 
Yeah IOK is more integrated. Be happy. Keep fooling yourself. :lol:

You might be a lesser idiot as compared to other of your compatriots. But still you are an idiot. Enough said.

Don't undermine the elite one :no:
 
Chitral, Swat, Khairpur, Bahawalpur etc etc aren't disputed territory. Kashmir is.

Kalat annexation went down much better than your bogus accession papers of Kashmir. If those papers had any worth or validity you wouldn't have just 55% of erstwhile Kashmiri state today.

Your failed logic can't make the accession paper illegal, its as legal as that of Chitral or Swat or Bahawalpur. infact Pakistan has no document to claim the so called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, that's you still don't give those people representation in Pakistan's Parliament. Regarding Kalat, perhaps you are forgetting how the Prince Karim Khan of Kalat state led the first Baloch rebellion just after the annexation of Kala in 1948.
 
Your failed logic can't make the accession paper illegal, its as legal as that of Chitral or Swat or Bahawalpur. infact Pakistan has no document to claim the so called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan, that's you still don't give those people representation in Pakistan's Parliament. Regarding Kalat, perhaps you are forgetting how the Prince Karim Khan of Kalat state led the first Baloch rebellion just after the annexation of Kala in 1948.

It is illegal and bogus, that's why Kashmir is a disputed territory. And you were left with just 55% of your atoot ang. It is the bogusness of those papers or of the guy who signed them that till today you are supposed to talk to us on this issue. I can just laugh at you on comparing Kashmir with Swat or Chitral. :lol:

Prince Karim Khan was nobody.
 
joke of the century...

the people of FATA are a proud and autonomous people but they aren't opposed to Pakistan or being part of Pakistan

that's more than we can say about Kashmir vis a vis hindustan --- and events of the past 24 hours show that

I didn't asked for the feelings of FATA, it was referring to FCR which was created by British to make Pashtuns of FATA feel that they aren't ruled by outsiders, now British were replaced by Pakistanis. The system is still retained under article 247 of Pakistan's constitution.
 
joke of the century...

the people of FATA are a proud and autonomous people but they aren't opposed to Pakistan or being part of Pakistan

that's more than we can say about Kashmir vis a vis hindustan --- and events of the past 24 hours show that

What you have seen in past 24 hours in J&K happens every week (if not every alternate day) in places like FATA, SWAT, Karachi, Balochistan or KPK.. If that's any indication, then well... :)
 
It is illegal and bogus, that's why Kashmir is a disputed territory. And you were left with just 55% of your atoot ang. It is the bogusness of those papers or of the guy who signed them that till today you are supposed to talk to us on this issue. I can just laugh at you on comparing Kashmir with Swat or Chitral. :lol:

Prince Karim Khan was nobody.

I ask you again how you consider an accession paper as illegal and Pakistan's control of 1/3 of Kashmir as legal when you have no document to support your claim on that 1/3 of the territory of princely state of Jammu and Kashmir. Don't tell me one side consider it as disputed, even Afghans considers Durand Line as disputed.

Don't undermine the elite one :no:

Yes, the scores of daily rape thread by an elite member on a defence forums. :wacko:
 
Back
Top Bottom