Kashmir 'NEVER Merged' with India | CM Omar Abdullah

[Areesh]

SRINAGAR: Jammu & Kashmir chief minister Omar Abdullah on Wednesday reiterated his party's stand that the state's accession was not a merger with the Indian Union in 1947.

"While all the states acceded to the union of India and then merged with it, Jammu & Kashmir only acceded and not merged. That is why we have special status, our own constitution and the flag,'' he said while talking to a European Union Delegation.

He said the Kashmir issue was linked to the partition when future of all states except Jammu & Kashmir was decided and underlined the need for a sustained dialogue with Pakistan and separatists.

Omar said there were diverse views regarding the issue. "While one extremist view is for cession, the other is total merger of the state with the union of India,'' he said.

"Unless the process of dialogue is started with a view to find out flexibility in both of the views and carve out a roadmap of addressing the issues, the position will not change.''

He said the Constitution provides a framework for dialogue with separatists.

J&K never merged with India: Omar - The Times of India

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

LOL, I love the headlines they write in the TOI.

They like to make it as dramatic as possible.

 

[karan.1970]

LOL, I love the headlines they write in the TOI.

They like to make it as dramatic as possible.

Its all about the circulation.. You should see India TV (a pseudo news channel) sometime...

 

[Areesh]

Neither did East Pakistan.. What I am trying to say is that special status does not have much to do with how integrated a territory is with the country.

It matters a lot. Because when an Indian trolls brings Baluchistan in middle of Kashmir discussion, it means comparing apples with oranges.

 

[INDIC]

Lol. You are a professional clown or after joining this forum you have learned this talent?

So, you are only left with personal insults when ran out of logic.

 

[Areesh]

So, you are only left with personal insults when ran out of logic.

Balushitan has no special status. IOK has. Enough said.

Your logic deserved you such insult. You keep coming with such bullsh!t, you would be ridiculed.

 

[INDIC]

Balushitan has no special status. IOK has. Enough said.

Your logic deserved you such insult. You keep coming with such bullsh!t, you would be ridiculed.

You guys always question accession of Kashmir in India, so did Kalat(Balochistan) accede to Pakistan, infact both Kalat and Kashmir were invaded under Brigadier Akbar Khan.

Even FATA has special status under article 247, Pakistani army can't even guard the Pak-Afghan border in FATA. While the so called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan even don't have right to representation in Pakistani parliament.

 

[Areesh]

You guys always question accession of Kashmir in India, so did Kalat(Balochistan) accede to Pakistan, infact both Kalat and Kashmir were invaded under Brigadier Akbar Khan.

Even FATA has special status under article 247, Pakistani army can't even guard the Pak-Afghan border in FATA. While the so called Azad Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan even don't have right to representation in Pakistani parliament.

Does Baluchistan have any special status? No.

End of story.

 

[INDIC]

Does Baluchistan have any special status? No.

End of story.

Then why you use the false term occupied, when Kashmir acceded to India unlike the Kalat which was annexed.

 

[Areesh]

Then why you use the false term occupied, when Kashmir acceded to India unlike the Kalat which was annexed.

Because it is a disputed territory unlike Baluchistan and Tibet.

 

[INDIC]

Because it is a disputed territory unlike Baluchistan and Tibet.

Even if you consider it disputed, how it justify using the word 'Occupied', we had accession, you had nothing. You have no document to support the so called Azad Kashmir or Gilgit-Baltistan as the part of Pakistan, the territories even don't have representation in Pakistani Parliament.

BTW even Afghans believe Durand Line is disputed including the pro-Pakistan group Afghan Taliban.

 

[Areesh]

Even if you consider it disputed, how it justify using the word 'Occupied', we had accession, you had nothing. You have no document to support the so called Azad Kashmir or Gilgit-Baltistan as the part of Pakistan, the territories even don't have representation in Pakistani Parliament.

BTW even Afghans believe Durand Line is disputed including the pro-Pakistan group Afghan Taliban.

Since it is disputed it is occupied. Its fate is yet to be decided. About Afghans. Well tell them to take the case to UN.

 

[Donatello]

They are commenting about Kashmir but don't anything about their own country.

They have FCR Laws in FATA and article 247 in Pakistani constitution, thus no Pakistani laws is applicable in FATA, Pakistani Army can't even guard the FATA-Afghanistan border, its unconstitutional.

Unlike Kashmir which signed accession paper with India, Kalat(Balochistan) was annexed on 27 march 1948.

What if i say Pakistani Army DOES Guard the border along FATA?

Will it crumble your obviously verified and credible Indian Masala News source?

 

[INDIC]

Since it is disputed it is occupied. Its fate is yet to be decided. About Afghans. Well tell them to take the case to UN.

But it is considered disputed only by one side Pakistan. How can even use the word "Occupied" legally without having any historical document to support your claims. Even you could not get Maharaja to force him to sign surrender document unlike that of Kalat.

What if i say Pakistani Army DOES Guard the border along FATA?

Will it crumble your obviously verified and credible Indian Masala News source?

They are there because of war on terror, Pakistan army entered in FATA (Tirah) in 2004 for the first time since Pakistan's creation in 1947. FCR laws have provision for local militias to look at the security affairs of FATA.

 

[Donatello]

Even if you consider it disputed, how it justify using the word 'Occupied', we had accession, you had nothing. You have no document to support the so called Azad Kashmir or Gilgit-Baltistan as the part of Pakistan, the territories even don't have representation in Pakistani Parliament.

BTW even Afghans believe Durand Line is disputed including the pro-Pakistan group Afghan Taliban.

What Afghans say doesn't mean shyt. They can't take control of their hinterland and they want more?

About Gilgit-Baltistan, it a specially administered region, with full powers to Islamabad.

See, the funny this is that as a citizen of Pakistan i have been to Gilgit-Baltistan and Azad Kashmir, while Indians cannot go there.

Here is the official governance order of GB:
http://www.gilgitbaltistan.gov.pk/images/stories/downloads/Governance-Order.pdf

And here is their website:
:::Government of Gilgit Baltistan:::



Hence your argument is rendered invalid.

So tell me, how is the Indian terrorized part of Kashmir dealing? Just read the news.


It's funny how senior members like you can be so stupid, and then those liking your posts who take stupidity to the Indian national level.