What's new

Karachi will be part of India one day,We believe in 'Akhand Bharat' : BJP

Small brain
silly ,
description for you, To show the doctor. 😁
Well cant come up with answer that proves that marathas took revenge for their destruction from occupants Peshawar to Panipat by Durranis only option you had left on PDF was trolling 🤣 I am happy its not twitter where pajeets like you start abusing when they have no point
 
.
"number of Maratha causalities were compensated by merciless killing of rohilla Pathans of rohilkhand who sided with abdali in battle of panipat,later By maratha forces in 1772 ,"

Ahh yes, pride in war crimes tends to be the final refuge of such a humiliated nation. Well done on the massacres.

Check this out though, marathas massacred plenty of dharmics and smashed temples too.

Be proud of all such episodes.


 
.
Don't act imbecile, Durranis never attacked India again after panipat.
Here Letters by ahmad shah durrani,


Though Abdali won the battle, he also had heavy casualties on his side and sought peace with the Marathas. Abdali sent a letter to Nanasaheb Peshwa (who was moving towards Delhi, albeit at a very slow pace to join Bhau against Abdali) appealing to the Peshwa that he was not the one who attacked Bhau and was just defending himself. Abdali wrote in his letter to Peshwa on 10 February 1761

"There is no reason to have animosity amongst us. Your son Vishwasrao and your brother Sadashivrao died in battle, was unfortunate. Bhau started the battle, so I had to fight back unwillingly. Yet I feel sorry for his death. Please continue your guardianship of Delhi as before, to that I have no opposition. Only let Punjab until Sutlaj remain with us. Reinstate Shah Alam on Delhi's throne as you did before and let there be peace and friendship between us, this is my ardent desire. Grant me that desire."
These circumstances made Abdali leave India at the earliest. Before departing, he ordered the Indian chiefs, through a Royal Firman (order) (including Clive of India), to recognise Shah Alam II as Emperor.


Map of India in 1765, before the fall of Nawabs and Princely states nominally allied to the emperor (mainly in Green).
Ahmad Shah also appointed Najib-ud-Daula as ostensible regent to the Mughal Emperor. In addition, Najib and Munir-ud-daulah agreed to pay to Abdali, on behalf of the Mughal king, an annual tribute of four million rupees. This was to be Ahmad Shah's final major expedition to North India, as the losses in the battle left him without the capacity to wage any further war against the Marathas, and as he became increasingly preoccupied with the rise of the Sikhs.

Shah Shuja's forces (including Persian advisers) played a decisive role in collecting intelligence against the Maratha forces and was notorious in ambushing the leading in hundreds of casualties.

After the Battle of Panipat the services of the Rohillas were rewarded by grants of Shikohabad to Nawab Faiz-ullah Khan and of Jalesar and Firozabad to Nawab Sadullah Khan. Najib Khan proved to be an effective ruler. However, after his death in 1770, the Rohillas were defeated by the British East India Company.[citation needed] Najib died on 30 October 1770.

The result of the battle was the temporary halting of further Maratha advances in the north and destabilisation of their territories for roughly ten years. This period is marked by the rule of Peshwa Madhavrao, who is credited with the revival of Maratha domination following the defeat at Panipat. In 1771, ten years after Panipat, Mahadji Shinde led a large Maratha army into northern India in an punitive expedition which re-established Maratha domination in that area and punished refractory powers that had either sided with the Afghans, such as the Rohillas, or had shaken off Maratha domination after Panipat. But their success was short lived. Crippled by Madhavrao's untimely death at the age of 28, infighting ensued among Maratha chiefs soon after, and they ultimately met their final blow at the hands of the British in 1818.
And doesnt matter if Durrani attacked or not only thing that matters is Marathas with Sikhs and Mughals attacked Peshawar and in return not just lost grip on Peshawar and Punjab but lost in area till Panipat 🤣

Hun pitto Rohillia nu 🤣
 
.
Quite simply, marathas were ultimately defeated by the British, and couldn't decisively defeat the mysoreans without the British and the Nizam.

The true resistance against the British came from Haider and Tipu, refusing to side with the British against their local enemies, which cost them ultimately.

To this very day, it irks saffron revisionists that Marathas gleefully sided with abrahamics in order to wage war against other abrahamics. What exactly did the marathas do for Hindustan or the Indian subcontinent, other than to sell themselves to the highest abrahamic slave master available at the time to further their humble ambitions. When in their history can it be argued that the marathas actually defended the supposed native concept of hindu Hindustan from the abrahamic legions? On the contrary, they were simple opportunists, smashing Hindu temples as much as anyone else, slaughtering natives as much as anyone else, and allying with foreigners against natives to further their ambitions.

Dead Maratha kings would have a good chuckle over the pathetic sanghees who swoon over their legends as though they were some noble bastion of native hindustani resistance against foreigners. I don't think they ever believed such arbitrary nonsense themselves, yet their spiritual successors gleefully gulped all the koolaid at once!

"During the First and Second Anglo-Mysore Wars, Haider Ali had brought the British to their knees. Tipu would come to inherit a formidable burden: his father died during the Second Mysore War that he successfully concluded, but two more wars with the British followed in the Third and Fourth Anglo-Mysore Wars, as well as myriad battles with hostile neighbours on all sides, notably the Marathas to the north west, and the kingdom of Hyderabad to the north east."


The fourth Anglo-mysorean war:
"Mysore's alliance with the French was seen as a threat to the East India Company and Mysore was attacked from all four sides. Tipu's army was outnumbered 4:1 in this war. Mysore had 35,000 soldiers, whereas the British commanded 60,000 troops. The Nizam of Hyderabad and the Marathas launched an invasion from the north. The British won a decisive victory at the Siege of Seringapatam (1799). Tipu was killed during the defence of the city. Much of the remaining Mysorean territory was annexed by the British, the Nizam and the Marathas."

Well done marathas for hanging onto the coat tails of more empires than anyone else in Hindustani history. What a great record to hold.
Deliberately skipped first anglo-maratha war, didn't you??
Probably to glorify tipu and his hordes . who kept reducing to the numbers, with each war inflicting defeats.
 
.
Deliberately skipped first anglo-maratha war, didn't you??
Probably to glorify tipu and his hordes . who kept reducing to the numbers, with each war inflicting defeats.
Where are martha forces today ? Dont see them 😕 their numbers reduced and all that left today is c*rrylickers and streetsh*tters
 
.
"number of Maratha causalities were compensated by merciless killing of rohilla Pathans of rohilkhand who sided with abdali in battle of panipat,later By maratha forces in 1772 ,"

Ahh yes, pride in war crimes tends to be the final refuge of such a humiliated nation. Well done on the massacres.

Check this out though, marathas massacred plenty of dharmics and smashed temples too.

Be proud of all such episodes.


lol, :yes4:😁
Ignorance at its best , why don't you Pakistanis read full context, rather opt for handpicking the incidents to choose your propaganda,
the attack on temple of srirangapatnam,
Although the regular troops did not attack the math(temple), the pindari (muslim non combatants) who did not act with ‘any check or control’ did. The Maratha polity was anguished over the act and efforts were on to compensate and appease the Swami for nearly a year after. In 1791, Tipu seemed to have changed his approach to temples and Brahmins when faced with an all round attack. Due to past excesses, Tipu’s vakeels were denied an audience by the Maratha chiefs in the run up to the siege of Srirangapatnam. The Maratha letter writers remark on Tipu’s acts as they were uncharacterisitic of him.
Where are martha forces today ? Dont see them 😕 their numbers reduced and all that left today is c*rrylickers and streetsh*tters
Here are the Marathas today, lol 😂😁
Now you will see them for sure 😁 :laughcry::haha:
WHERE ARE AFGHAN ROHILLA PATHANS??? :haha:
 
Last edited:
.
lol, :yes4:😁
Ignorance at its best , why don't you Pakistanis read full context, rather opt for handpicking the incidents to choose your propaganda,
the attack on temple of srirangapatnam,
Although the regular troops did not attack the math(temple), the pindari (muslim non combatants) who did not act with ‘any check or control’ did. The Maratha polity was anguished over the act and efforts were on to compensate and appease the Swami for nearly a year after. In 1791, Tipu seemed to have changed his approach to temples and Brahmins when faced with an all round attack. Due to past excesses, Tipu’s vakeels were denied an audience by the Maratha chiefs in the run up to the siege of Srirangapatnam. The Maratha letter writers remark on Tipu’s acts as they were uncharacterisitic of him.

Here are the Marathas today, lol 😂😁
Now you will see them for sure 😁 :laughcry::haha:
Man there are too many Indians on our forums we are too liberal to listen to their shit!
 
. . .
lol, :yes4:😁
Ignorance at its best , why don't you Pakistanis read full context, rather opt for handpicking the incidents to choose your propaganda,
the attack on temple of srirangapatnam,
Although the regular troops did not attack the math(temple), the pindari (muslim non combatants) who did not act with ‘any check or control’ did. The Maratha polity was anguished over the act and efforts were on to compensate and appease the Swami for nearly a year after. In 1791, Tipu seemed to have changed his approach to temples and Brahmins when faced with an all round attack. Due to past excesses, Tipu’s vakeels were denied an audience by the Maratha chiefs in the run up to the siege of Srirangapatnam. The Maratha letter writers remark on Tipu’s acts as they were uncharacterisitic of him.

Here are the Marathas today, lol 😂😁
Handpicked? The pindari did this without instruction or involvement of Hindu masters?

1) Pindaris, as the English soldiers eye-witnessed at many places during this war, operated upon the orders of Maratha chieftains. They would be let loose on those towns whose residents refused to pay them ransom.

2) The Maratha cavalry was under the command of various chieftains. While most took direct orders from Bhau, some chieftains bypassed him and acted upon the war plans of the Peshwa council that accompanied Bhau.

Either way, the Pindaris or the cavalry could not have acted without knowledge or participation of their hindu masters.

"Summarized below is a sequence of events that lists, in chronological order, twenty-six such places affected by Maratha soldiers’ brutalities, as witnessed by contemporary sources.


1790

Aug. 6: Maratha General Parshuram Bhau approaches Gokak to invade Karnataka (present day Mysore Kingdom) with a detachment of East India Company’s Bombay Army commanded by Captain Little. Marathas have upward of 10,000 fighting men including 5,000 Pindaris marauders.

Sep.10: Betgeri villagers, north of Dharwar town, beats back Bhau’s Pindari marauders. Bhau sends his Rohilla Gardee troops who plunder the village without mercy and capture many villagers.

Sep. 14: Bhau’s army swells to a cavalry of 15,000 and an infantry of 3,000. Armies camps at Narendra village a few km north of Dharwar. English soldier David Price witnesses burning of a village by Maratha soldiers at night.

Sep. 15: Hubbali Town surrenders to Bhau after paying him protection money. Town and its inhabitants not harmed. Maratha and English armies start their attacks on Dharwar.

Dec. 13: Bhau’s eldest son Appa Saheb enters Dharwar town, as its defenses crumble. His troops start setting afire to the town at various places.

Dec. 18: Bhau’s men get complete control of the Dharwar town and plundered it ‘so completely that not a piece of wood was left standing‘.

1791

Apr. 04: Badruzzaman Khan, Qilledar of Dharwar, surrenders the fort after a siege of six months. Several small towns and villages in vicinity razed to the ground by the Maratha soldiers.

Between Apr. 04 to Jul. 06: Maratha cavalry led by Raghunath Rao, brother of Parshuram Bhau pillage Sringeri.
May 20: Captain Little’s detachment joins the route taken by Bhau’s army to Srirangapatna, near the town of Harihar. English soldier Moor wrote ‘The route of the army is marked by rain and devastation; every village and town being burned and razed with the ground…In the distance of ten miles, perhaps, as many villages destroyed will be seen, without an inhabitant to tell their names: such is the havoc this destructive army has caused in this fair country.’

May 27: Chikkanayakanahalli (present day Tumakuru District). Maratha soldiers always pick up fights with village heads and inhabitants. They take away things from the Kannadiga villagers without paying.

May 29: Maratha soldiers sell grains and commodities looted from Kannadiga villagers during their march from Dharwar to Srirangapatna, at exorbitant prices to desperate soldiers of Cornwallis’s army.

Attacks on towns, villages, and agricultural lands, mostly dominated by Hindus, after the pillage of Sringeri

Jul. 8: After marching up from Melukote near Srirangapatna, Bhau and Captain Little march north-west from Bangalore intending to take Sira.

Jul. 13: Hindu holy town of Devarayanadurga, in present day Tumakuru District, is taken by assault. Looted and burnt by Maratha soldiers.

Jul. mid: Sira fort is the base of Parshuram Bhau’s solders. They raid nearby villages. Buchanan, who visited the place about a decade later, found all the villages around the town plundered. Bhau’s soldiers attack Mooka Nayakanahalli Kote (MN Kote) village (in today’s Tumakuru District). On failing to capture and loot the town, they abduct young Kannadiga girls (11).

Jul. mid: Bhau marches to the hill fort of Ratnagiri situated today along the Karnataka – Andhra Pradesh interstate border. Buchanan travelled along the same path a decade later and witnessed a scene of devastation due to Bhau’s soldiers from which it had yet to recover. Buchanan also wrote about similar scenes of destruction at the neighbouring Badavanahally village in Madhugiri Taluk of Tumakuru District.

Jul. end: Maratha and British soldiers approach the prosperous town of Hiriyur. The people of town pay a considerable sum of money to Bhau, who promised it protection from his Pindaris. Yet, the town is looted by marauders of one of the Maratha chiefs.

Aug.: Bhau camps in the vicinity of Chitradurga through much of August while his cavalry goes around for forage and his marauders plunder Kannadiga villages. Around the same time, Captain Little’s detachment leaves for the British hospital set up at Harihar town. A detachment of Maratha troops under Raghunath Rao and Bala Saheb rides north-west and captures Rayadurgam. Rao ensures his troops do not loot towns and villages, unlike Sringeri. Both stay back to capture Molakalmuru the month after.

Aug. 12: Bhau’s soldiers take the village of Talaku, Chitradurga District by assault. Loot and burn it."

That's a lot of looting by pindaris without any knowledge of Hindu masters. Gosh. Makes one wonder what the hindu masters were doing if their pindari detachment alone did all that.

That list is incomplete btw. It gets boring and repetitive reading about Hindu-Hindu violence.

You can stop being a tool now.
 
.
"number of Maratha causalities were compensated by merciless killing of rohilla Pathans of rohilkhand who sided with abdali in battle of panipat,later By maratha forces in 1772 ,"

Ahh yes, pride in war crimes tends to be the final refuge of such a humiliated nation. Well done on the massacres.

Check this out though, marathas massacred plenty of dharmics and smashed temples too.

Be proud of all such episodes.



Couple of things to be noted. Marathas who fought for their own kingdom against aurangazeb all tend to come from peasant or farmer castes including shivaji. But marathas who invaded other kingdoms including hindu kingdoms to massacre and extract tributes are are brahmins who took over the maratha empire with their blah blah blah about religion and purity.

Thats essentially the history of south asia - enormously skilled people build systems but will be wrecked from inside and stolen by brahmin elites. Now they want kashmir.
 
.
I mean, you've got documentation by whites of marathas raping non-brahmins. Isn't this example precisely the problem modern Hindustan suffers from?

"Dec. 17: Bhau’s army camp on the east bank of Tungabhadra River, eight miles from Holehonnur, near Kudli Mutt. According to Moor, a married Dalit woman is sexually assaulted and murdered by a member of Maratha Army’s Brahmin advisor near Shivamogga. Instead of punishing the offender, Bhau, has himself ‘purified’ by bathing in Tunga Bhadra river. He gets himself weighed in gold and silver and distributes the equivalent worth, about ten thousand rupees, among Brahmins. Around the same time, Maratha armies do a more brutal enactment of their Sringeri massacre. They ransack Kudli Mutt and massacre all non-Brahmins. The Kudli Swamy threatens to expel Bhau from the Smarata sect of Brahmins, after which Bhau donates a rupee each to Brahmins of the Mutt and compensates the Swamy with four lakh rupees"


@suyog chavan

Don't run off. We're not finished here. And don't pick certain posts of mine to respond to. Please address all my concerns. Yknow, context and all that.
 
.
lol, :yes4:😁
Ignorance at its best , why don't you Pakistanis read full context, rather opt for handpicking the incidents to choose your propaganda,
the attack on temple of srirangapatnam,
Although the regular troops did not attack the math(temple), the pindari (muslim non combatants) who did not act with ‘any check or control’ did. The Maratha polity was anguished over the act and efforts were on to compensate and appease the Swami for nearly a year after. In 1791, Tipu seemed to have changed his approach to temples and Brahmins when faced with an all round attack. Due to past excesses, Tipu’s vakeels were denied an audience by the Maratha chiefs in the run up to the siege of Srirangapatnam. The Maratha letter writers remark on Tipu’s acts as they were uncharacterisitic of him.

Here are the Marathas today, lol 😂😁
Now you will see them for sure 😁 :laughcry::haha:
WHERE ARE AFGHAN ROHILLA PATHANS??? :haha:
Lolx these shudars ain no marathas... maratha warriors or empire doesnt exist mate as for rohillas they are alive and well making up largest pashtoon community in india..
 
. . .

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom