kalu_miah
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2009
- Messages
- 6,475
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
Now back to your OP ... I am afraid it would less "childish" had you not affixed dates. And it would be better had you not offered too much detail.
A Huntingtonian/Spenglerian world order or any of its variations has been proposed in one flavour or another even on this veritable forum time and time again. Its eventual permutations are beyond the wisdom of men. Don't try to be a "secular prophet" as this is my friendly advice.
Personally I am dead against an Ultimate World Government. There would then be no escape from tyranny, unless, of course space travel becomes a real option. Even then one would just be "escaping to a colony" ...
Now some form of world governance, if not "government" is clearly already upon us.
What can I do about it? Resistance in a "secular", worldly sense is clearly futile, and one might even say "counter-productive". But it's impossible to desist ...
Being a "secular prophet" is not my intent. I am trying to construct a model using some obscure theory/hypothesis in Historical Sociology and use this model to predict the future. If the model is correct, then a majority of things I predict here using these few theory may become reality, but if the model is incorrect, then it will be back to the drawing board.
World government sounds stifling, but it may not be, depending on the model of the govt. The future model and design of govt. will be very different than what we see today and I believe there will be a lot more modeling and quantitative analysis done in the fastest super computers and perhaps using artificial intelligence as well, much more than what we use in governance today. Planetary management is I think what is needed rather than country or even management of regional unions, which will continue to be inefficient and wasteful for humanity.
I have put this road map considering the best data I have on the history of these different regions, the things they have in common, like language, ethnicity, culture, religion etc. The reason I made these union of states to be of certain size is to maintain balance between different poles of the new multi-polar world, as much as possible, considering what we have as the initial condition and constraints. Of course it is just an idea and suggestion from one man based on a certain model. But more than the details of the process, the method I believe is also important, because without a proper scientific method, we will not be able to go far. I wish we had more people who are professionals in Social Science and specialized on Historical Sociology, with whom we could have meaningful and professional discussions, because I myself is no professional in those fields. I am just an amateur expressing my views from my personal experience.
India forming an union with the rest of the countries in south asia is fine as long as BD and Pak are NOT included in that.
We are better off without them.
That is exactly what I suggested in OP.