What's new

JF-17 thunder vs Tejas MK-1 a unbiased comparison

Status
Not open for further replies.
If its unbiased than you have to agree following :
1)Tejas weight to thrust ratio is poor than that of JF 17 than whats the point of being light weight.
2)whats the point of Unique Shape. Every fighter has unique shape and design.
3)Tejas has extremely low combat radius and range.Its can not be to to penetrate but only as an interceptor. So practically its not a multipurpose fighter.
4)whats the point of going to be equipped with astra bvr. In future JF 17 will be equipped with next gen bvr missiles. Its already equipped with RAAD cruise missile but tejas can not fire brahmos right now.

If you are unbaised how can you say tejas has better handling. Have you flown tejas or jf 17.

Kindly close this thread you haven't do justice with your thread title.
How JF17 have better thrust to weight ratio than LCA TEJAS???
Please explain why you saying JF17 have greater combat radius than LCA???
 
There should be comparison of fighters which are in service. Tejas is not in active service and therefore this discussion is mute. This thread needs to be closed as all it will do is incite troll fest.
A
 
Teja is Light "wait"




Ah, my dear Young Pak,

People are just jealous of this Mighty Tejas... it is so unique that there is no comparison in the universe for this mighty star destroyer.

How do you think Indians beat the Chinese in the recent stand off?

China is affraid of Tejas...their J20 is a sitting duck in front of this invisible plane which can fly even underground or underwater!!

Why are the airforce chiefs from the US and France begging to take a ride in this Mighty Machine?

NATO is begging to induct this wonderweapon in their arsenal... but Indians are refusing to give ToT on Tejas even to the Americans!!!

The global geo-political game changer.... this Mighty Tejas is.


So, my friend, there is no comparison.... everyone must accept defeat or be bombed into another dimmension by the Great Gangeezlanders! The Tejas is coming...


Only cure is the stones.... if you know what I mean!


Keep doing your thing!

Mangus
 
Ah, my dear Young Pak,

People are just jealous of this Mighty Tejas... it is so unique that there is no comparison in the universe for this mighty star destroyer.

How do you think Indians beat the Chinese in the recent stand off?

China is affraid of Tejas...their J20 is a sitting duck in front of this invisible plane which can fly even underground or underwater!!

Why are the airforce chiefs from the US and France begging to take a ride in this Mighty Machine?

NATO is begging to induct this wonderweapon in their arsenal... but Indians are refusing to give ToT on Tejas even to the Americans!!!

The global geo-political game changer.... this Mighty Tejas is.


So, my friend, there is no comparison.... everyone must accept defeat or be bombed into another dimmension by the Great Gangeezlanders! The Tejas is coming...


Only cure is the stones.... if you know what I mean!


Keep doing your thing!

Mangus
Tejas is God's Gift to Aviation we humans were not worthy of Tejas but God blessed Indian with it
 
Unique shape and stealth? What do you mean by unique shape? A ufo hahahaha it's like someone is selling Tejas like shampoo in our street.unique shape hahahahaha
 
If its unbiased than you have to agree following :
1)Tejas weight to thrust ratio is poor than that of JF 17 than whats the point of being light weight.
2)whats the point of Unique Shape. Every fighter has unique shape and design.
3)Tejas has extremely low combat radius and range.Its can not be to to penetrate but only as an interceptor. So practically its not a multipurpose fighter.
4)whats the point of going to be equipped with astra bvr. In future JF 17 will be equipped with next gen bvr missiles. Its already equipped with RAAD cruise missile but tejas can not fire brahmos right now.

If you are unbaised how can you say tejas has better handling. Have you flown tejas or jf 17.

Kindly close this thread you haven't do justice with your thread title.

1) thrust to weight of tejas is not inferior but actuly a bit better than JF17, u can try looking at the engine specs at most common website that is Wikipedia where tejas mk 1 and jf17 block 2 specs are available. At best they can be said comparable.
2) Yes unique shape is there but actuly shape of tejas allows low speed handling as well as high speed handling better than jf17. Also because of the shape just look at the take of distance of both which proves my point. All of it is because of better wing loading.
3) Yes the range or combat radius is lesser but that is not the parameter for multi role aircraft (which is actually aircraft ability to perform various missions), and penetrating role is for deep strike long range aircrafts or bombers but tejas is fully capable of refueling and carry out AtoA and AtoG missions.
4) Any interceptor in the world is equipped with latest BVR missiles (tejas also fired derby and python and will get next gen missiles too) just like the air superiority aircraft so that contradicts what u were saying in point 3 and 4. But anyways yes jf17 is ahead in terms of cruise missiles atleast c803 is integrated completely. tejas on the other hand is not may be beacuse it is intented as a 2nd line of fighter jets who knows or may be just because of delay of lighter bhramhose


Also jf 17 is enjoying orders from paf as well as abroad add a plus to it
 
There should be comparison of fighters which are in service. Tejas is not in active service and therefore this discussion is mute. This thread needs to be closed as all it will do is incite troll fest.
A

That's literally the only advantage JF-17 has over the LCA.
 
That is the only advantage that really matters as of today!

Considering the time frames we are talking about, the 'advantage' really is irrelevant. There is only a 3 year difference between the two aircraft considering the JF-17 only achieved full 4th gen capability only in 2015 with the Block 2.

Not to mention the objectives are also very different. Pakistan's experience with the JF-17 is extremely limited, while a successful LCA will mean India's aerospace industry has come of age to the point where it will become revolutionary for the entire global aerospace industry, not just India.
 
@The Eagle , @waz , @Horus please close this troll, flaming thread thank you

Considering the time frames we are talking about, the 'advantage' really is irrelevant. There is only a 3 year difference between the two aircraft considering the JF-17 only achieved full 4th gen capability only in 2015 with the Block 2.

Not to mention the objectives are also very different. Pakistan's experience with the JF-17 is extremely limited, while a successful LCA will mean India's aerospace industry has come of age to the point where it will become revolutionary for the entire global aerospace industry, not just India.
:lol::lol::enjoy: good one Mr @randomradio :rofl::rofl::enjoy:
 
If its unbiased than you have to agree following :
1)Tejas weight to thrust ratio is poor than that of JF 17 than whats the point of being light weight.
2)whats the point of Unique Shape. Every fighter has unique shape and design.
3)Tejas has extremely low combat radius and range.Its can not be to to penetrate but only as an interceptor. So practically its not a multipurpose fighter.
4)whats the point of going to be equipped with astra bvr. In future JF 17 will be equipped with next gen bvr missiles. Its already equipped with RAAD cruise missile but tejas can not fire brahmos right now.

If you are unbaised how can you say tejas has better handling. Have you flown tejas or jf 17.

Kindly close this thread you haven't do justice with your thread title.
bachay ki jan lo gay kia???:lol:
 
pakistani members here are very naughty. itni bisti ker datay hain becharay indians ki when they start a foolish thread. is tarah k discouraging attitude say bachay under confident ho jatay hain or sari umar ihsas e kamtari ka shikar ho jatay hain.
 
Well let me explain
Tejas id made up of carbon fiber which is around 60-70% stealth quality, 2nd thing it's small size , good handling at low altitude and low speed further enhanced it's stealth quality. JF-17 thunder doesn't have any stealth quality at all.
2 nd thing tejas is not made for 1st line attack so no need a larger radius jet. For 1st line attack india has sukhoi 30.
3rd thing it has batter handling because it works on fly by wire technology which is 5th generation technique.

And 4th thing which will make pak worry is tejas will be soon equipped with brahmos missile. Drdo is working on that and already successfully tested from sukhoi 30.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom