Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no, block 2.Block III ?!!
We let 'em fly the Block III?
Opsss......very sorry. Sent via cell phone..... couldn't check the thread......
Depends! If IAF wants an excuse to retire the Tejas then possible. If it is any good they will keep it far away from any skirmish till they get used to the platform. This is not to cast any aspersions against the Tejas. It is just the fact that you dont fly in with a new platform till you have adequately honed your skills on the platform and IAF has not had enough time on the platform for it to be taken in to the front line and be used for a sortie.HAL Tejas MK1A vs JF-17 Block II: What if Tejas MK1A face-off with JF-17 Block II at the next Kashmir skirmish?: https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2...-jf-17-block-ii-at-the-next-kashmir-skirmish/
HAL Tejas MK1A vs JF-17 Block II: What if Tejas MK1A face-off with JF-17 Block II at the next Kashmir skirmish?: https://www.globaldefensecorp.com/2...-jf-17-block-ii-at-the-next-kashmir-skirmish/
They would use IFR to fill the AC up. However to what extent will a 4+2configuration degrade loitering time and distance.If there is a patch then it looks like they might have experimented with this configuration as well though it will certainly decrease the range of the aircraft. View attachment 623640
They would use IFR to fill the AC up. However to what extent will a 4+2configuration degrade loitering time and distance.
Don't forget the centreline fuel tank.The innermost hardpoints carry two 1100L tanks,the internal fuel capacity is around 2300L so utilizing these two hardpoints for weapons would mean a significant drop in range.
Personally I'd still prefer twin launchers for SD.10's.