Sir i am in 100% agreement with you but my opinion is still the same we should not rely on nukes and conventional capability should be for winning the war and not for even stale mate ... even for that if we have to eat grass or to freeze all unexplanable foreign and domestic assets of zardaris shareefs chudhries and all other criminals ...
This is do or die situation ... if we dont want to be another bagladesh and dont want to be satellite state of india then we should make ourselves strong ...
Hi,
You are 110% correct---.
Conventional strength makes a monster out of pakistan---.
Nuclear strength---makes it a weakling---.
Look at Israel---no one knows about it nuc program---but look at its conventional strength---more than enough to smash thru all its enemies at one go---.
The question muslim pakistanis need to ask---why is the Yid so consumed by conventional strength---when it has enough resource to demolish all the middle east and more---.
The next question to be asked is---are the Yids following the Golda Meir's actions of following the example of Prophet Mohammad PBUH?
Pakistan and Paf has been resting on its laurels---and the U S has been digging deeper and deeper into where Paks nuc assets lay---.
They believe that out of 13 places / locations---the U S knows about 4 of them---that was 2 years + ago---.
But my information says that the U S knows between 7-9 locations by now.
Once all the sites are known---with its quick deployment force in GCC and those 10000 visas given---it thinks that within 30-60 minutes---once the word go is given---those sites would all be neutralized---.
Maybe a site or two be able to launch the first missiles---and that would be all---and these missile could be intercepted thru anti missile missile batteries---.
The thing is---that in order for your INSURANCE to work right---you ought to have a GUARANTEE---and that Guarantee is air superiority and heavy strike platforms---.
You know a very interesting thing---al the pakistan air force personal and some of theor cohorts on this board have not moved an inch from their beliefs that the Paf may have committed a folly----or there maybe error in assessment somewhere---.
Each one of those members is 100% solid convinced of the Paf's stand---and those members have not moved an inch from the stand they took for the last 10 years that I have talked to them---.
And that is extremely worrisome---. You have to look at it this way---an organization that bought a sanction prone aircraft---an organization that lived in sanction for 10 + years---an organization that has not bought single high performance aircraft in the last 15 1/2 years---how can that prganizations word be trusted---.
The more important issue here is---what kind of people are we dealing with who still live with conviction of what the Paf does---. That issue is the most intriguing---.
