JF-17 Thunder Multirole Fighter [Thread 4]

[mdcp]

Can we do some modification onto wings and make them extendable so can carry many no's, in case of use of weapon either realing can get extended and make gap so can fire missile after that can re adjust or may be can put some jack so when require to fire the hard point can go down and shoot like bvr missile not too much heavy but cuz of hard points cant take too many
As wings are small and not many hardpoint so its just an idia can it work or not

 

[v9s]

PT-04 + WS-13.......

Nabil...that still looks like RD-93.

Isn't WS-13's nozzle more 'short'?

 

[Dazzler]

WS-13 looks quite similar to RD-93 but it is being tested on PT-04 at Gizhao factory (manufacturer of WS-13).

 

[Manticore]

 

[Manticore]

2013-01-02 (China Military News by China-defense-mashup) — In recent Chinese CCTV military news report, China has develop a new air combat simulation system for PLA Air Force. It is interesting that TV screen show that the single unit of simulation is marked with Chinese and Indian national flags. This may indicate that Chinese Air Force has eyed Indian air power as its main counterpart......................

Simulation system shows India is the main enemy of China - China Defense Mashup

 

[trident2010]

2013-01-02 (China Military News by China-defense-mashup) — In recent Chinese CCTV military news report, China has develop a new air combat simulation system for PLA Air Force. It is interesting that TV screen show that the single unit of simulation is marked with Chinese and Indian national flags. This may indicate that Chinese Air Force has eyed Indian air power as its main counterpart......................

Simulation system shows India is the main enemy of China - China Defense Mashup

And here Chinese posters say that they don't consider anything below USAF as a threat !!

 

[Bossman]

And here Chinese posters say that they don't consider anything below USAF as a threat !!

and you take internet posters seriously?

 

[SQ8]

And here Chinese posters say that they don't consider anything below USAF as a threat !!

Poster from all countries have their delusions.
Out of ten, then you find one that is worth discussing anything with.

Where in those ten you belong is entirely upto one's own intellect and ego.

 

[Alfa-Fighter]

I think their is some mistake here......

Normal take off weight - 9.1 Tonne{jet with full internal Fuel}


Maximum Take Off Weight - 12.7 {Jet+Fuel+External Load}

That means

Maximum External load - 3.6 Tonne {12.7 Tonne - 9.1 Tonne}

their is lot of contradictory information about JF-17, and non appears to be correct ...

 

[trident2010]

and you take internet posters seriously?

Its good to know about others point of view.

 

[trident2010]

Poster from all countries have their delusions.
Out of ten, then you find one that is worth discussing anything with.

Where in those ten you belong is entirely upto one's own intellect and ego.

Yes. That is true. Constructive criticism is always good but when someone doesn't want to hear other person's point of view is annoying sometimes. Anyways we all have done these sort of things too more than once so hope they learn soon to respect others opinion too.

 

[ANG]

Can we do some modification onto wings and make them extendable so can carry many no's, in case of use of weapon either realing can get extended and make gap so can fire missile after that can re adjust or may be can put some jack so when require to fire the hard point can go down and shoot like bvr missile not too much heavy but cuz of hard points cant take too many
As wings are small and not many hardpoint so its just an idia can it work or not

Hi, extending the length or width of the wings on an aircraft increases the drag, and hence the need for more thrust. It might also affect other aerodynamic capabilities, and as such, you simply cannot make one part bigger without other penalties.

 

[Dazzler]

Hmmm.....

"Ordnance Technology the CM-400AKG CM400AKG, cruising altitude in 50KM, speed of Mach 5.5, you can ignore the PAC3 and Aster 30 interceptor (intercept altitude is not enough), infrared imaging can be used at the end (amazing precision) hit moving targets (aircraft carrier is not blowing, standard missile shot high the intercept CM400AKG) or passive radar-guided anti-radiation missile (in this case do use) CM-400AKG's Cruising Altitude is at a height of 50km., speed 5.5 mach, however PAC3 (interception Altitude 20km ) or Aster-30 (range of fire: 120km, altitude of fire 20km) unable to intercept the CM-400AKG. The IIR Seeker of CM-400AKG has great abilities, The percentage of hits is shocking in test.The 'carrier killer' is not the a for brag Also CM-400AKG with Passive Radar can be a nice ARM (5.5ma)"

 

[satishkumarcsc]

Hmmm.....

"Ordnance Technology the CM-400AKG CM400AKG, cruising altitude in 50KM, speed of Mach 5.5, you can ignore the PAC3 and Aster 30 interceptor (intercept altitude is not enough), infrared imaging can be used at the end (amazing precision) hit moving targets (aircraft carrier is not blowing, standard missile shot high the intercept CM400AKG) or passive radar-guided anti-radiation missile (in this case do use) CM-400AKG's Cruising Altitude is at a height of 50km., speed 5.5 mach, however PAC3 (interception Altitude 20km ) or Aster-30 (range of fire: 120km, altitude of fire 20km) unable to intercept the CM-400AKG. The IIR Seeker of CM-400AKG has great abilities, The percentage of hits is shocking in test.The 'carrier killer' is not the a for brag Also CM-400AKG with Passive Radar can be a nice ARM (5.5ma)"

Any video of this missile test?

 

[giant panda]

a china aviation magazine article on the sole JF-17 production base kamra about two years ago

http://i.imgur.com/ySmrV.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/lGkG5.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/q52cv.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/Tay9S.jpg