Kompromat
ADMINISTRATOR
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 40,366
- Reaction score
- 416
- Country
- Location
Nabil.
Lets suppose we are able to Integrate ws-13 which would have almost 100KTN of Thurst and would result in greater performance and larger payload capacity.
If the Payload capacity is increased and what do you say about Redesigning the Rear part of the Landing gear to recover differently inside the airframe to accomodate one or two more Hardpoints as they did with Gripen NG.
Also if the Payload capacity is enhanced , should we Add MER's for BVRM's too ?
As you know MER's can carry upto 2 or 3 missiles each which means two PL-9c on the wingtips , and 2 on each hardpoint on the eiter sides which will bring the number of the missiles carried to 10 on 6 hardpoits & the Drop tank can be carried under the fuselage.
Configuration will change according to the mission requirements.
Something Like this:
They have been successfully tested on Thunders for Ground munitions.
Lets suppose we are able to Integrate ws-13 which would have almost 100KTN of Thurst and would result in greater performance and larger payload capacity.
If the Payload capacity is increased and what do you say about Redesigning the Rear part of the Landing gear to recover differently inside the airframe to accomodate one or two more Hardpoints as they did with Gripen NG.
Also if the Payload capacity is enhanced , should we Add MER's for BVRM's too ?
As you know MER's can carry upto 2 or 3 missiles each which means two PL-9c on the wingtips , and 2 on each hardpoint on the eiter sides which will bring the number of the missiles carried to 10 on 6 hardpoits & the Drop tank can be carried under the fuselage.
Configuration will change according to the mission requirements.
Something Like this:
They have been successfully tested on Thunders for Ground munitions.