Jehad calls against India in Pak national assembly

[Bull]

This comment by the parlimentarian was extremely stupid. It should not be taken seriously by anyone. These are the sort of people who repeatedly ask the government to give up all support to the US and who think that somehow conflict with the US and India is the right path to pursue.

People in Pakistan do not share his view. I'm not talking about the uneducated street dwellers, I'm talking about the educated, urban population who control the country.

This statement is being undue weightage. Just last week we heard Obama calling for hot pursuits into Pakistan and even in India we have our own share of idiots making such statements like ' finishing off Pak in a week', but the fact remains that not a single one of them has made it into the Parliament.

 

[solid snake]

This statement is being undue weightage. Just last week we heard Obama calling for hot pursuits into Pakistan and even in India we have our own share of idiots making such statements like ' finishing off Pak in a week', but the fact remains that not a single one of them has made it into the Parliament.

There are idiots everywhere. A US congressman called for the destruction of Mecca and Medina, Muslim holy sites. Does that mean that the US will actually carry out this action? Nope. One man and his silly fantasies does not change anything.

 

[EagleEyes]

Indians claiming is *** as important to the Indians as much as Pakistani's claiming IOK. Now, it is a significant step from the Indians they have left their claim on ***. It is quite unrealistic to even consider they will part with IOK. And for Pakistani's to think, when talking about Kashmir Indians and the rest of the world wouldnt include the whole of Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir of pre-1947, is nothing other than sheer stupidity. In that sense, World will see more sense when India drops claims on *** will Pakistan keeps on harping about IOK. Kashmir problem will die down in the next 10 years in my opinion.

Just a neutral oberservation.

And a fairly good one. If you post like that. Two thumbs up for you.

Again, let me update you with something new for you. There was no, or is such thing called *** as you can see, there is no such thing like that on this site either. It is a made up theory by the right wing hindu nationalist party to put up their claim in order to have an automatic edge into the resolution. One is Northern Areas and Other is Aksai Chin (China). What the real discussing area is Jammu & Kashmir, also known as Indian Occupied Kashmir, which needs to be solved and be given to Pakistan where it belongs. Otherwise, the theory i posted above can be used as well.

Thanks.

 

[Marathaman]

And a fairly good one. If you post like that. Two thumbs up for you.

Again, let me update you with something new for you. There was no, or is such thing called *** as you can see, there is no such thing like that on this site either. It is a made up theory by the right wing hindu nationalist party to put up their claim in order to have an automatic edge into the resolution. One is Northern Areas and Other is Aksai Chin (China). What the real discussing area is Jammu & Kashmir, also known as Indian Occupied Kashmir, which needs to be solved and be given to Pakistan where it belongs. Otherwise, the theory i posted above can be used as well.

Thanks.

Why don't we give you some updates. There was no, or is such a thing called IOK. It is a made up theory by right wing Muslim politicians looking for cheap votes, and looking for an automatic edge into the resolution. Both Northern areas and Aksai Chin have been occupied by military invasion, inspite of the perfectly legal accession to India by the last ruler.
This is the real dispute, which needs to be solved and both China and Pakistan need to give up their claims on Indian territory.
Otherwise, the theory of Akhand Bharat can be used as well.

Thanks.

 

[EagleEyes]

Marathaman,

Well done, you have proved that you can post.

Hah!

 

[Adux]

And a fairly good one. If you post like that. Two thumbs up for you.

Again, let me update you with something new for you. There was no, or is such thing called *** as you can see, there is no such thing like that on this site either. It is a made up theory by the right wing hindu nationalist party to put up their claim in order to have an automatic edge into the resolution. One is Northern Areas and Other is Aksai Chin (China). What the real discussing area is Jammu & Kashmir, also known as Indian Occupied Kashmir, which needs to be solved and be given to Pakistan where it belongs. Otherwise, the theory i posted above can be used as well.

Thanks.

Again, I hoped you would have the capacity to show some respect to the way I have posted. As i told you, when you have two sets people, from their own prespective's give them legality of their actions on the same piece of real estate. I expect a learned person like you who thankfully is not a right wing mullah or hindutva person, to a bit more of understanding of the other side.
I said IOK, and *** just so to keep that neutral mentality, so as to give you my hand in friendship. I could reply to you with the same contempt that you have given to the views of Indians. But then again whats the use, if a learned person like you can talk this way, I am not suprised with the Jihad call by the average mullah on the street. Every sad to see Pakistan go on a downward spiral of this sort.

 

[EagleEyes]

I can understand where your coming from, but if it was that simple. Kashmir problem wouldn't have existed. Pakistan since its creation was given assurance for Kashmir, and took it as an integral part of the country, and so may be India from the back side. But up to this date Pakistan Army didn't have to beat, malign, rape, oppress and kill innocent civilians of Kashmir like Indian Army has done.

But then again whats the use, if a learned person like you can talk like you, I am not suprised with the Jihad call by the average mullah on the street. Every sad to see Pakistan go on a downward spiral of this sort.

Oh please...

 

[Marathaman]

Marathaman,

Well done, you have proved that you can post.

Hah!

Never mind.

 

[Adux]

I can understand where your coming from, but if it was that simple. Kashmir problem wouldn't have existed. Pakistan since its creation was given assurance for Kashmir, and took it as an integral part of the country, and so may be India from the back side. But up to this date Pakistan Army didn't have to beat, malign, rape, oppress and kill innocent civilians of Kashmir like Indian Army has done.

OK, I am going to stop here,Where were the problems before 1989. The situation of *** is very explained by HRW report, read it. they have already said which side is better. But as far as I am concerned its like a pot calling a kettle black. The only people being getting harrassed is the people of ertswhile Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir, whether it is the *** or IoK, Lets not be naive, wether it is India or Pakistan, it has nothing to do with a secular Kashmir or Pakistan version of Kashmir. It just Land grab, from both sides.

 

[Awesome]

An Indian PM demanding holy war? I don't think so.

"Decisive" War.

 

[EagleEyes]

OK, I am going to stop here,Where were the problems before 1989. The situation of *** is very explained by HRW report, read it. they have already said which side is better. But as far as I am concerned its like a pot calling a kettle black. The only people being getting harrassed is the people of ertswhile Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir, whether it is the *** or IoK, Lets not be naive, wether it is India or Pakistan, it has nothing to do with a secular Kashmir or Pakistan version of Kashmir. It just Land grab, from both sides.

Oh please. Dont bring the HRW report again, again & again. Its a total bullocks!

And you remember it quite well. Leave the situation of both Kashmirs for a different debate. You, me, and the whole world knows it quite well about the situation.

Lastly, your right it has nothing to do with what version of Kashmir, but it has everything to do with the land where it belongs.

For India it may be a land grab, but for Pakistan it is a different story. It is our country.

 

[Adux]

Oh please. Dont bring the HRW report again, again & again. Its a total bullocks!

And you remember it quite well. Leave the situation of both Kashmirs for a different debate. You, me, and the whole world knows it quite well about the situation.

Lastly, your right it has nothing to do with what version of Kashmir, but it has everything to do with the land where it belongs.

For India it may be a land grab, but for Pakistan it is a different story. It is our country.

Very dandy and emotional. Keep on harping like that, otherside wouldnt even hear your side of the story.

The international community doesnt take it, the way you mentioned. Read the EU report or the HRW report. I do know well about Pakistan intentions in their cloak of the so called "Kashmiri Freedom"

 

[Marathaman]

For India it may be a land grab, but for Pakistan it is a different story. It is our country.

On what basis, do you consider Kashmir a part of Pakistan?

 

[Awesome]

On what basis, do you consider Kashmir a part of Pakistan?

Because the Kashmiris consider it a part of Pakistan.

 

[IceCold]

India cant do any more Icecold, we have already given up our claim on ***, Northern Areas and Balitistan, If we want we can still demand for it. Kashmir is not possible, and you wont get it. Forgive my aggressive tone, but people will have to move on, as India did with *** and other areas

LoC as the border will be the only solution acceptable to India, The rest will keep on happening until people get tired of it. Indians wont back down, and I am not trying to show bravado here.

Wasnt it india who took IOK to unitednations and made it an international dispute, though india doesnt count it anymore. And as for *** when did it become a disputed terrority accept for india and that too was only BJP after exploding nuclear, threat pakistan lets talk about kashmir but the pakistan side one after which pakistan tested its own loosen the dhoties of the indian leaders and they back steped.
India can claim what ever it wants doesnt change the fact that IOK is the disputed terrority recognized by the international community and not the otherway round.