ChineseTiger1986
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 23,530
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Alright we see that.
The US doesn't even consider you as a challenge since you don't even have the capability to attack their soil.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Alright we see that.
we don't want to attack USThe US doesn't even consider you as a challenge since you don't even have the capability to attack their soil.
The reality is... the real weak insignificant player in the game is India.
According to your funny logic, the US should target you first.
Not today's Japan. Their economy is still not good. Still recovering from the tsunami aftermath.no bro...i was talking about their ability to quickly build up, reorganize all things etc.
you didn't get it. nato wants japan against russia and japan wants nato against china because china wants russia against japan and russia wants china against nato. meanwhile india may be planning to imitate russian roulette in tibet. in such a geopolitical great game, the weaker will be the loser.
we don't want to attack US
Even you don't have capibilities to attack Us on their Soil without Nukes you are as hopeless as we areThe US doesn't even consider you as a challenge since you don't even have the capability to attack their soil.
we have nothing to do with tibet unless it consider Arunachal Pradesh as south tibet.meanwhile india may be planning to imitate russian roulette in tibet.
Even you don't have capibilities to attack Us on their Soil without Nukes you are as hopeless as we are
why u want to provoke us against USA...we don't consider them as potential enemy....it's just we don't trust them as friend."Don't have the capability" is the more appropriate words.
why u want to provoke us against USA...we don't consider them as potential enemy....it's just we don't trust them as friend.
ok so almighty Chinese army should have taken half of world already by now....but u r not doing that coz you don't need that...The main issue is of NEED and consideration of capability will come later.Because you are still not on the level to challenge their hegemony.
We did have this capability since 1980.
Come on your Smoking weed or some think you cannot attack Attack Us conventionally on their Own land if yes explain how will you beat there generation ahead Air, Sea, land , Defences.Dream on dudeWe did have this capability since 1980.
only russia has this presently or i would like to see a chinese bomber flying off the coasts of california.
Come on your Smoking weed or some think you cannot attack Attack Us conventionally on their Own land if yes explain how will you beat there generation ahead Air, Sea, land , Defences.Dream on dude
I'm not kid i don, t assume you show some BS Random article I see particality dude even whole world Combine can attack USA conventionally.Assume whatever you can If that gives you satisfaction.This is more efficient than the bomber.
Bomber is just a show off. In a real war, they will throw at each other with ICBMs, not bomber.
DF-5 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Are you sure about that?
U.S. Navy Sees Chinese HGV As Part Of Wider Threat | AWIN content from Aviation Week