What's new

Israeli missions in India, Georgia targeted


Well , that's disturbing , but still , it doesn't make sense at all. Iran won't risk relations with India just to kill a single israeli diplomat's wife. Besides , did you read about the style of the attack? Two young men on a motorbike came and attached a device to the car that exploded and then sped off. That has Indian Mujahideen or SIMI written all over it. But again , if the intelligence says it's Iran , i guess it is. Iranians are nice people but Ahmedinajad guy is sort of a crackpot. He is capable of doing stuff like this.
 
If you kill their people... they will kill yours... its a vicious circle... stop killing iranian scientists first.
 
Pakistan's geopolitics is when it was directly involved in a war between two superpowers in the 80s on its Western border that lasted for 10 years, & the current war that has lasted for 10 years. The global WOT has not only engulfed the US, but countries from all over the world registered in NATO, the Middle East & Central Asia. Pakistan has already faced the dilemma of China vs US relations, Pakistan-Iran pipeline admist intense US pressure, Balochistan. The NATO supply routes go through Pakistan, as well as through Central Asia.

India has been living in fool's world as of now in terms of geopolitics. It might get its first real taste of international geopolitics, the great game soon if it pursues its Iran projects. And here are some interesting comments coming from the Times of India:



Israel embassy car blast: Indian intelligence hints at Iran's hand - The Times of India

Pakistan was fooled by the US into believing that the Jihad it is carrying out in A'stan is in its own interest. For some money and weapons Pakistan provided its services against the Soviets.

Pakistan althougth hoped that if it fought America's wars, US would help it vis-a-vis India (Pakistan's real threat) when time comes. Unfortunately, the US has been unsuccessful or unwilling in bailing out Pak when it needed its help

As for the comments on ToI, India is a land of "the opposite is also true". You'll find all shades of opinions regarding every subject. Pro-Israel, anti-Israel.
 
Iran knows India cannot stop importing oil from them, it is simple, and if they get angry with Iran they will simply lower prices. India wants to look the other way because it is easier than to accept the harsh reality.

This was a sloppy attempt at retaliation that went from a great terror plan to show that Iran can reach Israeli diplomats that ended with the diplomat`s wife being hurt.
Thailand, Azerbaijan, Georgia and India in just a matter of few months, this is coordinated terrorism.
 
Bl[i]tZ;2596667 said:
Pakistan was fooled by the US into believing that the Jihad it is carrying out in A'stan is in its own interest. For some money and weapons Pakistan provided its services against the Soviets.
Umm, no, it was the other way 'round. Pakistan started supporting armed resistance groups in Afghanistan in the mid-70s under Z.A.B. and got the U.S. to acquiesce to it by waving the flag of anti-communism. When the Russians later invaded the U.S. turned on the supply taps full force.

Pakistan althougth hoped that if it fought America's wars, US would help it vis-a-vis India (Pakistan's real threat) when time comes. Unfortunately, the US has been unsuccessful or unwilling in bailing out Pak when it needed its help
Pakistan betrayed its mutual-defense agreements with the United States, attempting to turn them into "blank cheque" support of Pakistani leaders' quest for glory. Naturally the U.S. balked.

No need to believe me, of course: just check out the volumes of Foreign Relations of the United States to read the declassified U.S. government records for yourselves. (Though for the Afghan stuff you'll have to read Zbigniew Brzezinski's accounts.)
 
How does that contradict what Sarthak said? Read the article. The intelligence officers suspected that Iranian sympathizers were behind the attack. Note that Iranian sympathizers are not Hezbollah or the Iranian government.
Iran is the one telling when and how, funds them and gives them instructions. It does not matter who was on the bike, Indian Muslim or Arab Muslim, it was on orders from Iran.
 
Iran is the one telling when and how, funds them and gives them instructions. It does not matter who was on the bike, Indian Muslim or Arab Muslim, it was on orders from Iran

Hi,
Just Wondering, What Makes You So Sure ? :rolleyes:

---------- Post added at 10:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:00 AM ----------

You have been raping women and killing children in Kashmir for decades. That is terrorism in the most vile form. India and Israel are both terrorist occupying states, the only difference is Israel is expanding and doesn't rape like India.


Don't Troll Here, You Are a Victim Of Pakistani Propaganda
Thankx
 
and got the U.S. to acquiesce to it by waving the flag of anti-communism. When the Russians later invaded the U.S. turned on the supply taps full force.
Pakistan betrayed its mutual-defense agreements with the United States, attempting to turn them into "blank cheque" support of Pakistani leaders' quest for glory. Naturally the U.S. balked.

Pak was hoping that if it waived the anit-communism flag Amerikis will also waive the anti-india flag (which they did in 71 under Nixon Administration). Pakistan's economic ideology was not Capitalist per se and it wasn't threatened by the SU regarding that.

Pakistan chose to be part of the cold war for meeting its own strategic objectives (read seeking parity with India), which the Americans did try to satisfy by enormous aid and weapons but like you pointed out, Amerikis for their own reasons were hesitant to invade India (the only way to bail Pak out in 71).

Umm, no, it was the other way 'round. Pakistan started supporting armed resistance groups in Afghanistan in the mid-70s under Z.A.B.
No need to believe me, of course: just check out the volumes of Foreign Relations of the United States to read the declassified U.S. government records for yourselves. (Though for the Afghan stuff you'll have to read Zbigniew Brzezinski's accounts.)

I've heard this theory by an Ameriki Professor (lady :P) in some seminar/hearing before. I didn't look into it because I think she often says things just to be talk of the town. :rofl:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom