What's new

Israel , so scared of Hezbollah Fateh 110


They say 90% success rating but out of 80 they intercept 30! & the more rockets are launched the lower that rate will get

Fact is 30 out of 80 is an extremely high success rating but this system would NEVER work against Fatteh-110! And the Arrow will at max have a 30% success rate against it!

Algorithms that give Iron Dome a high success rate only work against targets that have a fixed trajectory and a simple change in trajectory would bring down it's interception rates below normal levels Fatteh-110 constantly changes trajectory from flight to reentry Iron Dome will never intercept it & the Arrow 3 will at max have a 30% success rate against it which is a high rate for any Missile interceptor but it will never be 90% or even close to 50%!
 
.

They say 90% success rating but out of 80 they intercept 30! & the more rockets are launched the lower that rate will get

Fact is 30 out of 80 is an extremely high success rating but this system would NEVER work against Fatteh-110! And the Arrow will at max have a 30% success rate against it!

Algorithms that give Iron Dome a high success rate only work against targets that have a fixed trajectory and a simple change in trajectory would bring down it's interception rates below normal levels Fatteh-110 constantly changes trajectory from flight to reentry Iron Dome will never intercept it & the Arrow 3 will at max have a 30% success rate against it which is a high rate for any Missile interceptor but it will never be 90% or even close to 50%!
First of all, you are looking at the Iron Dome, that is designed to intercept rockets, not cruise missiles.

Second of all, it only intercepted 30 out of 80 missiles because why would it intercept a missile heading into open area with no population?

Third of all, the Arrow 3's success rate, according to Israel and the USA, is 99%, same about the Davids Sling.

Fateh 3 will be destroyed in seconds, its useless.
 
.

They say 90% success rating but out of 80 they intercept 30! & the more rockets are launched the lower that rate will get

Fact is 30 out of 80 is an extremely high success rating but this system would NEVER work against Fatteh-110! And the Arrow will at max have a 30% success rate against it!

Algorithms that give Iron Dome a high success rate only work against targets that have a fixed trajectory and a simple change in trajectory would bring down it's interception rates below normal levels Fatteh-110 constantly changes trajectory from flight to reentry Iron Dome will never intercept it & the Arrow 3 will at max have a 30% success rate against it which is a high rate for any Missile interceptor but it will never be 90% or even close to 50%!
It destroys only rockets headed toward populated area
 
.
First of all, you are looking at the Iron Dome, that is designed to intercept rockets, not cruise missiles.

Second of all, it only intercepted 30 out of 80 missiles because why would it intercept a missile heading into open area with no population?

Third of all, the Arrow 3's success rate, according to Israel and the USA, is 99%, same about the Davids Sling.

Fateh 3 will be destroyed in seconds, its useless.

Yea like the missile that hit that building in the Video! Even the ppl in the video contradict your nonsense but sure if that makes you feel safe and happy then it's 99%!

We Iranian's have a saying "You ask the fox who's your witness he say's it's my tail!" lol

Fatteh-110 is a tactical short range Ballistic Missile not a cruise missile! It's operational range for export version is 250km, Fatteh -313 is 500km & Zolfaghar that is based on the Fatteh design is 700km & all are tactical short ranged ballistic missiles!

To even suggest that a system has a 99% success rate just shows that figure is nothing more than absurd propaganda!
The Arrow likely doesn't even have 99% missile launch success ratings let alone interception rating!

FYI their is NO system in the world capable of detecting & tracking unlimited number of projectiles so every system known to man is capable of being overwhelmed!

And if Iran wanted fire missiles at you they would fire 500 missiles at you at once fired from different locations all around Iran & at max Israel would intercept no more than 20-30 of them
 
.
Fatteh-110 constantly changes trajectory from flight to reentry

i never heard before that Fateh-110 is changing trajectory before hitting target.
you maybe mix up with Iskander missile?
 
.
i never heard before that Fateh-110 is changing trajectory before hitting target.
you maybe mix up with Iskander missile?

Except for the 1st version which isn't produced for Iran anymore all the other ones have to adjust trajectory to hit the target in reentry! that means fixed trajectory algorithms for interception of rocket projectiles which is what the Iron Domes is hatred around don't work on them!
Persian Gulf Missile also does that, with missiles like that you can't get a CEP of under 30 meters if you don't
 
.
Except for the 1st version which isn't produced for Iran anymore all the other ones have to adjust trajectory to hit the target in reentry! that means fixed trajectory algorithms for interception of rocket projectiles which is what the Iron Domes is hatred around don't work on them!
Persian Gulf Missile also does that, with missiles like that you can't get a CEP of under 30 meters if you don't
The David's Sling defense system, that is also still being developed, is designed to intercept Syria and Hezbollah's tactical ballistic missiles (Fateh-110, M-600), that have a range of 200-300 km., at an altitude of 15 km. The different Patriot missiles, that failed to intercept Iraqi Scud missiles during the 1991 Gulf War, are meant to be a final backup and intercept missiles at an altitude of 10-12 km.
 
. .
@VEVAK I advise you not to waste your time trying and debate Israelis with any sort of reason -
There is is folks: the confession that reason is on the side of the Zionists and not their enemies.

Thanks for your help, A.P.

upload_2017-1-25_20-37-37.png
https://strategypage.com/htmw/htterr/articles/20170125.aspx
Counter-Terrorism: Russia And Israel Have An Arrangement


January 25, 2017: The Syrian government is complaining, to anyone who will listed, that Israeli missiles were used against an airbase outside Damascus and another hit a target in Damascus in December 2016 and again in mid-January 2017. Syria declared these attacks, and another in August 2016 were illegal Israeli aggression. Yet several days after the latest attack Russia broadcast a statement approving of the Israeli action, pointing out that the weapons these missiles destroyed (rockets and missiles from Iran) are an obvious threat to Israel and are meant for use by Hezbollah (the Iran backed Shia terror group in Lebanon) against no one else. Technically the Syrians may have a point but as the Russians made clear, in practical terms that the Israelis have little choice but to carry out these attacks. Recently the head of Hezbollah and Iranian military officials boasted openly about how Iran supplies Hezbollah with long range rockets and guided missiles for use in “destroying Israel.”

There is plenty of evidence that the targets of these attacks on buildings and trucks near Syrian airbases are weapons that explode. Cellphone videos of the recent Damascus attacks and subsequent explosions circulated widely. That video indicated the larger blast was a secondary explosion, as in a missile setting off ammunition or missiles stored in a warehouse. Israel rarely acknowledges air strikes like this but in early 2016 the Israeli government did reveal that it had carried out dozens of air raids in Syria and Lebanon to destroy Hezbollah weapons sent by air freight from Iran. In Lebanon Israeli aircraft also use smart bombs and missiles to attack Hezbollah weapons storage facilities that are found to contain new (usually Iranian or Russian) missiles. This sort of thing is nothing new. For example in February 2016 Israeli warplanes fired three missiles at a Syrian army base south of Damascus. This created more explosions as ammunition and explosives exploded as well. That was the first such attack in 2016 and there were several in 2015. Israeli warplanes have made dozens of attacks in Syria since 2013, several of them to destroy Russian weapons being moved to Lebanon (by Hezbollah) from airbases in Syria.

The most dangerous of these Iranian missiles is the Fateh 110. This began as an Iranian copy of the Chinese DF-11 ballistic missile, which used conventional warheads, GPS and solid fuel, which enables a missile to be made ready in less than 30 minutes compared to several hour for liquid fueled missiles like the older SCUD.

The Fateh 110 is an 8.86 meter (27.5 foot), 3.5 ton rocket with a half-ton warhead. The first version appeared after in 2002 and had a range of 200 kilometers. By 2010 there had been to improved models (often called Fateh 111 with ranges of 250 and 300 kilometers plus improvements in reliability and accuracy. The Fateh 110 developed to replace the liquid fueled SCUD ballistic missiles Iran had been using since the 1980s. SCUD was developed from the German World War II era V-2. In 2008 Iran licensed Syria build the Fateh-110 as the M600. In 2010 some of these were transferred to Hezbollah. Apparently the first Fateh-110 type missiles to be fired in combat were two Syrian M600s fired at rebel targets in 2012.

So while Iran is accurate in saying it sends a lot of these high-tech missiles and rockets to Hezbollah, at lot of them don’t reach their destinations and that is unlikely to change unless Iran moves its new Russian S-300 anti-aircraft systems into Syria. Apparently Israel has made arrangements with Russia to prevent that. This has something to do with what Israel knows about the S-300 and how to make it look bad in combat. Israel and Russia have many such deals since Israel was created after World War II. Russia, then the Soviet Union, was one of the first countries to recognize the state of Israel and one of the largest minorities in Israel are Russian Jews that were allowed to leave the Soviet Union in the last years of the Cold War.
 
.
Plans exist for a variety of contingencies. It's foolish to ask why each of those plans have not been carried out - if you don't know what those contingencies are or if they have not occurred. Professional armies don't attack targets just because they keep plans ready.

As for Hezbollah it's a been a turkey shoot for Israel on the Syria + Lebanese borer whenever Hezbollah preparations have been detected - and has been so long before the Syrian civil war. As I said before it would not make any sense to escalate the conflict by attacking Iran when the IDF is effectively able to deal with the Hezbollah threat.

I don't think the Israelis treat war as bravado and as long as their defense works, it makes no sense to pick new fights.
That is because they were humbled by the Arabs, before 73 and 2006 they were taking war as bravado..
For your other post on 48, Usrael had an army who fought in WW2 plus the best western weapons, the Arabs had almost nothing for weapons and those "armies" you are referring to were improvised armies with minimum training and very old weapons of WW1..67 was a surprise unprovoked attack backed by France and England, the trio fought the Egyptians in 56 already for the Suez canal, So you need some more studies before making false claims just to support an occupation regime that shares the same affinities with your country when it comes to occupying other's lands.. there is an old adage that says who kills by the sword will meet his death by the sword.. So sooner or later occupation by force will be ended by force..
As far as It concerns these Usraeli bombings in Syria, most of them might be just hitting decoys, while the real stuff is already hidden or coming soon..

Israel is top 10 most powerful in the world. They can handle Iran but no sure about Pakistan.
According to whom? Usrael has no strategic depth at all and can not sustain a prolonged war on its own for more than 1 month, since its economy will collapse.. Without the US it is nothing literally..

They can't handle either country without risk of being wiped off the map. Pakistani nukes can delete Israel, and Iran has enough missiles to completely level Israel too. Of course, both countries would go down with Israel, but that doesn't mean Israel would win.
They will only go down wit Usrael if the US intervenes, and then the latter will go down too, since most of its interests in the middle east and central Asia will go down too, and this in the extreme case scenario..
 
. .

They say 90% success rating but out of 80 they intercept 30! & the more rockets are launched the lower that rate will get

Fact is 30 out of 80 is an extremely high success rating but this system would NEVER work against Fatteh-110! And the Arrow will at max have a 30% success rate against it!

Algorithms that give Iron Dome a high success rate only work against targets that have a fixed trajectory and a simple change in trajectory would bring down it's interception rates below normal levels Fatteh-110 constantly changes trajectory from flight to reentry Iron Dome will never intercept it & the Arrow 3 will at max have a 30% success rate against it which is a high rate for any Missile interceptor but it will never be 90% or even close to 50%!

!

:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Europeans have chosen the word of rat for these creatures well. They hid just like rats.
View attachment 371870
Disgusting creatures.
The only disgusting one here are you.
 
.
Hmm... what ever your guy's quarrels are, one thing is for sure. With Trump as president our worse fears are more or less going to be realized. He might as well be an Israeli citizen at this point, so for Iran, its best to keep up weapons production (if not kick it up several notches into overdrive). In the US, Trumps entire cabinet and much of the Congress and Senate are hardcore anti-Iran politicians of the worst kind (ones that would see millions of Iranians killed for their own goals and agendas), this would be Ideal since it would force Iran out of Syria, Iraq and Lebanon, allowing the Arabs and Israeli's free reign over these countries.

A big war is coming soon, of that I'm certain. Then Iran and Israel can finally duke it out and see who was telling the truth all along about their own respective militaries weapons, tactics and fighting skill.


Iran, you guys really need to beef up or it will be ugly (not that you don't stand a chance). I would add that Russia still isn't your ally. They will back stab if the opposing sides offer is good enough (as weird as this sounds

Also. How can a missile defense system have a 99% hit rate? That does seem a little too optimistic (kind of comes off as propaganda to me). A saturation attack will render even the most advanced defense system useless if the batteries are taken out one by one. Seems a little too out there, 99%?
 
.
Yea like the missile that hit that building in the Video! Even the ppl in the video contradict your nonsense but sure if that makes you feel safe and happy then it's 99%!

We Iranian's have a saying "You ask the fox who's your witness he say's it's my tail!" lol

Fatteh-110 is a tactical short range Ballistic Missile not a cruise missile! It's operational range for export version is 250km, Fatteh -313 is 500km & Zolfaghar that is based on the Fatteh design is 700km & all are tactical short ranged ballistic missiles!

To even suggest that a system has a 99% success rate just shows that figure is nothing more than absurd propaganda!
The Arrow likely doesn't even have 99% missile launch success ratings let alone interception rating!

FYI their is NO system in the world capable of detecting & tracking unlimited number of projectiles so every system known to man is capable of being overwhelmed!

And if Iran wanted fire missiles at you they would fire 500 missiles at you at once fired from different locations all around Iran & at max Israel would intercept no more than 20-30 of them
Oh my god, learn something, Arrow 3 isn't David's sling and both of them aren't Iron Dome!
Those are different systems, David's Sling and Arrow 3 are way more modern, Iron Dome was designed in 2005.
The Iron Dome has 90%-88% success rate, its probable that some missiles would bypass it with some luck.

By cruise missiles I meant guided missiles, the David's Sling is able to destroy a wide range of targets- Any kind of a known aircraft, cruise missiles, every ballistic missile up to MRBMs.

An Iranian, talking about propaganda? You have shown us a plastic model and claimed its a working stealth fighter.

You don't have an unlimited amount of projectiles, and we have some of the best radar systems in the world.

How will you fire 500 missiles at us at once if you don't even have enough missiles that can reach us?
And we only need two or three missiles to "defeat" you.
 
.
You don't have an unlimited amount of projectiles, and we have some of the best radar systems in the world.

How will you fire 500 missiles at us at once if you don't even have enough missiles that can reach us?
And we only need two or three missiles to "defeat" you.

They have enough missiles to cause some hefty damage to Israel, you cannot block them all, keep that in mind. But Israel is capable of retaliating with just as much of a punch.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom