What's new

Is rural India angry with Modi?

AAP is a party without any basis or ground organisation. They are a congregation of demented retards who do not have any idea how to run a state or provide administration. They don't know how to build economy, they don't know how to fight inflation, they don't know how to make legislations, they don't know what to do after coming to power. All they can do is shout and make noise so that they remain in publicity.

Modi is not the best man for India but he is better than circus clowns sitting in Delhi who don't know what a government is.

Rural India or Corporate India is not angry with Modi. This is just paid media propaganda who want to see Modi out from power.
 
.
U want to discuss or troll??

If I want to acquire 10 Acre of Land from 10 farmer. How many farmers need to agree? 10/10? What if Pappu pay 1 farmer and project is stalled?

How much time will take to do "Social impact assesment"? Intel ran away from India because your Pappu Govt spent 2 years in Social assesment..


Like Master all Congress slaves are Brain dead...
Do you know to type anything else other than shoo?
SHoooo.....

Only 2% cut in overall spending in education while 22% increase in higher education,shifting focus on school to highereducation in the national budget.Jaitley proposed to set aside Rs.69,074.76 crore for education in 2015-16, as against Rs.70,505 crore in the revised estimate in 2014-15. 2 new IITs and 2 IIMs in the budget 2015-16 and 5 new iita and 5 new iims in budget 14-15 provided by pm.
 
. .
Its because of the new tax system, sates will receive more money as there tax percentage increased while central govt share decreased.

Read reports. It is a jalebi. At least in the near future no such thing will happen on ground. I'm sure for a poor country like India with large uneducated populaitons this is a great idea.
 
.
It was messy and incredibly inefficient and stupid. But unlike in Indira Gandhi days where 'illusory' compensation was given, things had improved a bit. The people who sold land for SEZs, for instance became crorepatis overnight (and spent it left and right to become bankrupt quickly). The current landbill, in the name of 'liberalization', acutally slinks in a sneaky provision- no consultation, % of people in an area consulted reduced/ not required, and some arbitrarily decided multiple to the rate in govt records to be paid. Landowners, instead of getting market rates, end up with a much reduced compensation- this is a prime point under 'special category'.

So the compensation needs to be increased?

The industrial houses anyway will be only benefited if the land (which majority is ) used for minimal farming or simply branded as farming land by poor farmers ( which are a majority)..
Availability of land, of course, is an essential precondition for building factories. It is a basic factor of production along with labour and capital utilized by industry. Of these three, though, land enjoys a unique position in that while the other factors can.

A rapid rise in labour productivity may not necessarily be a phenomenon that acts in the interest of the labouring class as a whole, for it implies that any given volume of output will require a smaller workforce to produce it. The labour required by the industrial sector could nonetheless rise over time, provided, of course, that the size of the manufactured produce itself grows at a high enough rate to engage not only more productive labourers, but also a larger number of them.

This is the way employment in China's industrial sector behaved from 2003 till 2012, during which period the number of workers engaged in industry expanded from 159.27 million to 232.41 million.

These figures translate to 21.6 per cent and 30.3 per cent of the total workforce for China. As opposed to this, India employed 24.7 per cent of its workers in industry in 2012, while in agriculture it had engaged 47.2 per cent of the workforce.

The land ordinance or act is aimed at reducing the size of the agricultural workforce through allocation of land to industry. Even if the land reallocation goal is achievable, what is not clear is how the displaced agricultural workers will be rehabilitated as industrial workers.

Employment generation in the industrial sector is not merely a technological phenomenon. Industry does not produce output unless it can be sold.

And the market for Indian goods is no longer restricted to its geographical boundaries. The country's open economy policies are gathering pace and this means that it is rapidly transforming into one amongst the many producers catering to world demand. Its producers have to compete with foreigners for a rising chunk of the world market, and this too when the world market itself has been in doldrums for the last few years.
Even China is showing signs of a slowdown, in spite of a political structure that allows workers to be woken up in the middle of the night to attend to lucrative export orders.
 
. .
Read reports. It is a jalebi. At least in the near future no such thing will happen on ground. I'm sure for a poor country like India with large uneducated populaitons this is a great idea.
The higher devolution is in line with the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission (FFC) headed by former RBI Governor Y.V. Reddy, accepted by the Union Cabinet in its meeting on25th feb, for a 42 per cent share to States in the divisible pool of Centre’s net taxes.

The previous Finance Commission had pegged the States’ share at 32 per cent.The FFC has made a fundamental shift in the pattern of financing revenue expenditures. There is a shift from scheme and grant-based support from the Central Government to a devolution-based one.

So the compensation needs to be increased?

The industrial houses anyway will be only benefited if the land (which majority is ) used for minimal farming or simply branded as farming land by poor farmers ( which are a majority)..
Availability of land, of course, is an essential precondition for building factories. It is a basic factor of production along with labour and capital utilized by industry. Of these three, though, land enjoys a unique position in that while the other factors can.

A rapid rise in labour productivity may not necessarily be a phenomenon that acts in the interest of the labouring class as a whole, for it implies that any given volume of output will require a smaller workforce to produce it. The labour required by the industrial sector could nonetheless rise over time, provided, of course, that the size of the manufactured produce itself grows at a high enough rate to engage not only more productive labourers, but also a larger number of them.

This is the way employment in China's industrial sector behaved from 2003 till 2012, during which period the number of workers engaged in industry expanded from 159.27 million to 232.41 million.

These figures translate to 21.6 per cent and 30.3 per cent of the total workforce for China. As opposed to this, India employed 24.7 per cent of its workers in industry in 2012, while in agriculture it had engaged 47.2 per cent of the workforce.

The land ordinance or act is aimed at reducing the size of the agricultural workforce through allocation of land to industry. Even if the land reallocation goal is achievable, what is not clear is how the displaced agricultural workers will be rehabilitated as industrial workers.

Employment generation in the industrial sector is not merely a technological phenomenon. Industry does not produce output unless it can be sold.

And the market for Indian goods is no longer restricted to its geographical boundaries. The country's open economy policies are gathering pace and this means that it is rapidly transforming into one amongst the many producers catering to world demand. Its producers have to compete with foreigners for a rising chunk of the world market, and this too when the world market itself has been in doldrums for the last few years.
Even China is showing signs of a slowdown, in spite of a political structure that allows workers to be woken up in the middle of the night to attend to lucrative export orders.
The land which will be acquired not only used for setting of new industry but also construction and expansion new schools,colleges,metro and monorail system,railways line,roadways,irrigation projects,waterways,river linking,defence projects including fencing along border,enhancement of forest for tiger reserves and national parks ,rural and urban homes for poor(6 crores to be built by 2022),food processing units like cold storage and processing plants,medicals both in private and govt sector.To link a village by PMGSY road some farmers have to give land inallignment of road.
 
.
The higher devolution is in line with the recommendations of the 14th Finance Commission (FFC) headed by former RBI Governor Y.V. Reddy, accepted by the Union Cabinet in its meeting on25th feb, for a 42 per cent share to States in the divisible pool of Centre’s net taxes.

The previous Finance Commission had pegged the States’ share at 32 per cent.The FFC has made a fundamental shift in the pattern of financing revenue expenditures. There is a shift from scheme and grant-based support from the Central Government to a devolution-based one.


The land which will be acquired not only used for setting of new industry but also construction and expansion new schools,colleges,metro and monorail system,railways line,roadways,irrigation projects,waterways,river linking,defence projects including fencing along border,enhancement of forest for tiger reserves and national parks ,rural and urban homes for poor(6 crores to be built by 2022),food processing units like cold storage and processing plants,medicals both in private and govt sector.To link a village by PMGSY road some farmers have to give land inallignment of road.
I would advise all sane guys to stop feeding AAP trolls. They are best left alone to live their miserable ignorant lives.
So stop replying to this useless thread.
 
. .
So the compensation needs to be increased?

The industrial houses anyway will be only benefited if the land (which majority is ) used for minimal farming or simply branded as farming land by poor farmers ( which are a majority)..
Availability of land, of course, is an essential precondition for building factories. It is a basic factor of production along with labour and capital utilized by industry. Of these three, though, land enjoys a unique position in that while the other factors can.

A rapid rise in labour productivity may not necessarily be a phenomenon that acts in the interest of the labouring class as a whole, for it implies that any given volume of output will require a smaller workforce to produce it. The labour required by the industrial sector could nonetheless rise over time, provided, of course, that the size of the manufactured produce itself grows at a high enough rate to engage not only more productive labourers, but also a larger number of them.

This is the way employment in China's industrial sector behaved from 2003 till 2012, during which period the number of workers engaged in industry expanded from 159.27 million to 232.41 million.

These figures translate to 21.6 per cent and 30.3 per cent of the total workforce for China. As opposed to this, India employed 24.7 per cent of its workers in industry in 2012, while in agriculture it had engaged 47.2 per cent of the workforce.

The land ordinance or act is aimed at reducing the size of the agricultural workforce through allocation of land to industry. Even if the land reallocation goal is achievable, what is not clear is how the displaced agricultural workers will be rehabilitated as industrial workers.

Employment generation in the industrial sector is not merely a technological phenomenon. Industry does not produce output unless it can be sold.

And the market for Indian goods is no longer restricted to its geographical boundaries. The country's open economy policies are gathering pace and this means that it is rapidly transforming into one amongst the many producers catering to world demand. Its producers have to compete with foreigners for a rising chunk of the world market, and this too when the world market itself has been in doldrums for the last few years.
Even China is showing signs of a slowdown, in spite of a political structure that allows workers to be woken up in the middle of the night to attend to lucrative export orders.

Look beyond the homilies man. Obviously they'll try to hardsell their plans. The quote you've made gives one wide jalebi from 'increasing productivity' to 'India will be global power'. Reducing size of agricultural workforce happens organically when Industrialization increases.
The simple question is what are the specific steps you take to safeguard the farmer's rights? You introduce a clause that says 'we can take over land at rates we want to give', everything else is just fluff. In China the land has never belonged to the people, so comparing with China is irrelevant, with US is extremely relevant. They say 'that land is unproductive'- buddy THAT IS LAND THAT YOU WANT, so its productive for you, so pay up. Saudi Arabia might be desert but the oil inside is productive for Aramco.Instead of using the government to get it cheap Industry had better get used to the idea that they'll have to compensate the landlords.
 
.
He is an AAPtard. Do not waste your time on him. He is a muftkhor who wants subsidies because he is too lazy to earn his own living.


Not #AAPtard.. But Ghulam.. die-hard Khangress supporter. Guru BrotherPappu is on leave.. Guru is Digvijay Singh...
 
. . . . .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom