Is India big enough to be a superpower?

[Superboy]

At 3 million square kilometers, in my opinion, no. China and the US are both 9.6 million square kilometers.

 

[Srinivas]

Why not create fake ids and vote nay to calm down your fears?

 

[root]

China has only potential to become super power. India becoming super power will only remain India wet dream.

 

[Sugarcane]

India is already suuuuuuper power

 

[C130]

size and resources matter, but that's not always the case

look at Japan rise from the 50's up to the 80's if they had the resources they probably would of been the closest thing to the superpower by now.

 

[Edison Chen]

India has enough population.

 

[Superboy]

size and resources matter, but that's not always the case

look at Japan rise from the 50's up to the 80's if they had the resources they probably would of been the closest thing to the superpower by now.

Japan was never a superpower. Japan too small. That's why Japan lost war to America

 

[pursuit of happiness]

At 3 million square kilometers, in my opinion, no. China and the US are both 9.6 million square kilometers.

-
as per that criteria what was Uk ..100 yr ago
same criteria Russia should go on top hands down..
and EU countires in bottom

Japan was never a superpower. Japan too small. That's why Japan lost war to America

--
Japan gave hard time to china and russia . how?

 

[Superboy]

-
as per that criteria what was Uk ..100 yr ago
same criteria Russia should go on top hands down..
and EU countires in bottom

Britain was over 30 million square kilometers 100 years ago, over 10 times the size of India. Britain was a superpower.

Japan gave hard time to china and russia . how?

Japan never troubled China. Too small.

 

[C130]

Japan was never a superpower. Japan too small. That's why Japan lost war to America

I never said they was. I said if they had the resources they would of the closest one by now.

they lost in WW2 because of tactics and losing the oil resources in the Dutch East Indies.

 

[Superboy]

I never said they was. I said if they had the resources they would of the closest one by now.

they lost in WW2 because of tactics and losing the oil resources in the Dutch East Indies.

Japan lost war because Japan was too small.

 

[pursuit of happiness]

Britain was over 30 million square kilometers 100 years ago, over 10 times the size of India. Britain was a superpower.




Japan never troubled China. Too small.

--
can you give me britain map in 1800 and 1900
The Japan-China War
JPRI Critique Vol. XIII No. 1

 

[Superboy]

--
can you give me britain map in 1800 and 1900
The Japan-China War
JPRI Critique Vol. XIII No. 1

Japan only took Taiwan, which is not even 0.03% the size of China. Too small.

 

[C130]

Japan lost war because Japan was too small.

are the UK and Rome small??? they practically had the largest empires ever.

size and resources are good but it's how you manage them and your fighting spirit

 

[thesolar65]

OP is really feeling insecure and petrified...I mean why he along with CCP thinks these things day and night?