What's new

Iran’s ‘father of all bombs’ dwarfs US biggest non-nuclear bomb: Commander

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
Usefulness of such a bomb. Cant use a c 130 against a country having half decent air defense.
Where does iran intend to use such a weapon?
 
.
its what metaphor(super power),and the way you speaking and using words (I have burnt your ***)show your reach culture.may be our aircraft cant flight now but at least i can sleep in my bed without fear of american drone that kill Pakistani people when ever they want

Well, even the metaphor is wrong. We know very well that we have a long long way to go. I used asteriks *** to test your dirty mind and my method worked :enjoy: and I know the way you think

Drone strikes were allowed by our govt and it was only limited in the region with terrorists and now they have been cleaned so now drone strikes have also ended. Update your info.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EAK
.
Usefulness of such a bomb. Cant use a c 130 against a country having half decent air defense.
Where does iran intend to use such a weapon?
they cant use it and i think they just build one or two of them for test if you want use such bomb make a nuclear one is better option.

Well, even the metaphor is wrong. We know very well that we have a long long way to go. I used asteriks *** to test your dirty mind and my method worked :enjoy:

Drone strikes were allowed by our govt and it was only limited in the region with terrorists and now they have been cleaned so now drone strikes have also ended. Update your info.
you cant kill terrorist your self and us must do it for you?!!!
 
.
I think Iran has good relations with China and Russia. Isn't it? and we also made our A/C in collaboration with China and totally customised it to our needs. Your A/C might be a great bird..I've no problem rather I'm happy but we just want to see some evidence. That's all we ask but normally we are not provided. Remember it is PDF and here we ask even Pakistanis to provide source/reference for their claims.
Iran, of course, is cooperating with China and Russia, but not in the construction of the plane, because if this cooperation was widespread, all Western countries would have to talk about it. This is a new news and evidence will be shown at the time of the test.
 
. .
Then it is not necessary to spam this forum either. Use some other forum where everyone believes you whatever claims you make

It's in our subforum, it's not bothering you. People like you like to troll simply by claiming that because something is in an early stage of development, and has little publicised information, it is fake. It's getting very old. An announcement is not an unveiling, remember that.

That is, if you don't want to troll like all the other Pakistan shupapowa guys in this thread.
 
.
It's in our subforum, it's not bothering you. People like you like to troll simply by claiming that because something is in an early stage of development, and has little publicised information, it is fake. It's getting very old. An announcement is not an unveiling, remember that.

That is, if you don't want to troll like all the other Pakistan shupapowa guys in this thread.

In fact I can smell the burning fat !!!
 
.
Do you think the C-130 can carry such a heavy bomb?
In principle, by weight, yes. Recall MOAB itself, designed to be delivered by a C-130 Hercules, primarily the MC-130E Combat Talon I or MC-130H Combat Talon II variants, weighs 9.8 tons ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GBU-43/B_MOAB ) .

C-130
Payload: 19.50 ton (C-130J), 19.958 ton (C-130J-30), 20.4 ton (C-130H)

Il-76
Payload: 42 ton (Il-76M), 48 ton (Il-76MD), 60 ton (Il-76MD-90A)


The smaller but heavier US' Massive Ordnane Pentetrator weighs 14 tons but it is not in tended for C130: each of the U.S. Air Force's B-2s is to be able to carry two 14-ton MOPs. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_Ordnance_Penetrator )

So, in practice, it would depend on bomb dimensions v cargo hold dimensions

At the OP says:
"“Following a proposal by the Aerospace Force of the Islamic Revolution Guards Corps (IRGC), [Iran’s] Defense Industries [Organization] manufactured a 10-ton bomb. These bombs are at our disposal. They can be launched from Ilyushin aircraft and they are highly destructive,” IRGC Aerospace Force Commander Brigadier General Amir Ali Hajizadeh said in a Friday TV interview.""

Iran has 3 C-130E/H and 5 Il-76 transports in the regular air force. Plus 3 Il-76 and 9 An-74 with the Aerospace force of the Revolutionary guard corps. If Iran could carry its bombs by C-130, then why didn't they? Instead they chose to use Il-76. IMHO, since An-74 doesn't have enough paylaod, that's either because of the bomb's dimensions relative to cargo hold / cargo bay door dimensions, or because it's a Revolutionary Guard Corps piece of ordnance.

av-transport-2.gif
 
Last edited:
.
It's in our subforum, it's not bothering you. People like you like to troll simply by claiming that because something is in an early stage of development, and has little publicised information, it is fake. It's getting very old. An announcement is not an unveiling, remember that.

That is, if you don't want to troll like all the other Pakistan shupapowa guys in this thread.

Oh, come on...be realistic.

Have you read the OP yourself? Tell me from which angle does it seem to be an early development? The article clearly claims that Iranian new bomb dwarfs USA's MOAB and Russia's FOAB in yield. How can one make such a tall claim for a product that is in the early development?

Can you elaborate? How did you measure the yield if it has not been tested quite a few times? Also, as your country is obsessed with secrecy, then why would it announce a product that has not been even tested? Just to boast right? And furthermore, the skepticism you face here is due to our past experience with tall claims being made without sufficient evidence. We do not differentiate in sub-forums as it is publicly shared.


No, Pakistani used the superpower word here and this shows your dishonesty so overcome your false national pride and wake up.

Pakistan tested an SLCM Babur-III, so it is in development but we released the not only the footage of the test but also provided some key information. Furthermore, at advanced stages we invite observers to see if our weapon hits the target.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EAK
. .
Because it is the IRGC who've acquired this weapon. The IRGC don't have C-130s (they are IRIAF aircraft), but they do have Il-76s.
Well, that's one of two reasons I gave. Anyway, if regular air forces also could use this, there's a min. of 8 and a max of 11 aircraft that could be used to deplooy this bomb. All of which preciously militar transports, which are relatively slow and vulnerable to ground fire e.g. by MANPADS. So, the use of the bomb would require at least local air superiority.
 
.
Wake up and try to overcome your nationalist pride and open your eyes, yes it was a JV but now it is fully produced in Pakistan and not only for PAF needs rather for export to other countries as well. Pakistan is also exporting Supermashaq.

India has been developing Tejas for more than 30+ years and it was designed by Dassault France and despite having access to all western technology, it is such a failure that their air force is not happy to accept it. Similarly, their Arjun MBT has also failed. While Pakistan's AK successful and its advanced version AK-II is entering the production soon. Furthermore, Pakistan despite being a 8 times smaller country than India exports more weapons to the world. POFs small guns are the most popular in even USA.

Most of the developing countries have failed in producing a successful 4th gen. A/C while JF17 is now entering block III that will be a 4.5 gen A/C. And unlike Iranians claims, our JF17 is flying high and there are plenty of videos on Youtube showing different aspects of its flight performance.

Now JF-17 has also started featuring in Hollywood movies,

And here is the aeronautical complex that produces this excellent A/C


Furthermore, many Muslim countries tried to develop a military nuclear program and they failed due to one reason or the other and Alhamdulillah Pakistan has been totally successful. So our claims are not empty like some people who just come here to fart.
HAHAHA ... the funnies post i ever read!!! talk abt a propaganda post and here it is

JF17 in Hollywood movie???? hahaha .... Boss, it from a HBO series called "the brink". Why don't you show the whole scenes where that F/AF 18 actually shoots down the JF17 and then takes down the IL76 next ... :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 
.
HAHAHA ... the funnies post i ever read!!! talk abt a propaganda post and here it is

JF17 in Hollywood movie???? hahaha .... Boss, it from a HBO series called "the brink". Why don't you show the whole scenes where that F/AF 18 actually shoots down the JF17 and then takes down the IL76 next ... :laugh::laugh::laugh:
I have shared the video in my post..so go and watch it and now buzz off...
 
.
Well, that's one of two reasons I gave. Anyway, if regular air forces also could use this, there's a min. of 8 and a max of 11 aircraft that could be used to deplooy this bomb. All of which preciously militar transports, which are relatively slow and vulnerable to ground fire e.g. by MANPADS. So, the use of the bomb would require at least local air superiority.

In truth we have a few more C-130s than 3 but anyway like the MOAB this is a very limited use weapon. The MOAB has only been used once. I don't think it makes too much difference whether you have a dozen or a hundred aircraft capable of dropping it.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom