ReasonableStar75
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 7, 2022
- Messages
- 549
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
he lives in iran by the way
He has an iranian IP, that s all we know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he lives in iran by the way
This is just what the current and past administration failed to do for a simple reason, having a "okay image" to the rest of the world and not resorting to harsher methodsNow I'm sure all your concerns for Iran is fake and all you care is destabilize Iran
Same old tricks,you`d have thought that the zionists would`ve at least tried to have come up with some new ones by now.
Same old tricks,you`d have thought that the zionists would`ve at least tried to have come up with some new ones by now.
Still if you have little choice but to rely on local traitors of dubious reliability in order to actually carry out any of your schemes on the ground,then that really does rather limit your options,not to mention your chances of success,more than just a little.
But it does show the necessity of continuous checking,not just of imported components,but also locally assembled ones at every stage of the process.
I would also pay very close attention to imported medicines,or components of these,plus scrupulous testing of the final product.I would also do this for iranian produced medicines,and indeed all other important iranian export products as well.
I mention that last part because I think that as the zionists and the wests ability to try and constrain iran continues to diminish still further,that they may well start to consider increasingly desperate,reckless and insidious means.
Never forget for an instant that you are dealing with regimes that at heart consider that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians [in just one single instance alone out of dozens] as "worth it".
Consider that the death of millions, even billions of civilian as worth it*Never forget for an instant that you are dealing with regimes that at heart consider that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians [in just one single instance alone out of dozens] as "worth it".
and you are talking with one of the few Iranian here who actually never left IranI am not interested in communities out of the country, or diaspora. You can have your vision and your dreams and delusions. I do not care by this.
but as far as I'm aware i usually use an encrypted proxy and my ip is rotating from Netherlands, to France to Singapore to USA and sometimes Russia , how you concluded my IP is from Iran as far as I'm aware its only moderators who can actually so posters IP and you are not one of them and non of them disclosed my IP hereHe has an iranian IP, that s all we know.
and you are talking with one of the few Iranian here who actually never left Iran
but as far as I'm aware i usually use an encrypted proxy and my ip is rotating from Netherlands, to France to Singapore to USA and sometimes Russia , how you concluded my IP is from Iran as far as I'm aware its only moderators who can actually so posters IP and you are not one of them and non of them disclosed my IP here
location flag is put there by yourself in your profileDon t cry me baby, i say your IP is from Iran from your Localtion Flag, IPs are allocated by country. You man, your comments are from the school epoch, even your foolish pic user. Not serious.
I have no bonds nor ties with admins here.
Nagging people calling others "head in the sand", this is the most ironic thing ever seen here
And the same suspects when Iran wants looks for diplomatic relations: "Iran is bowing down to the US" "Iran should make a nuke" "Oil for food program" nonsense
When Iran higher uranium production: "Iran is putting itself at risks of war" "Iran will never sustain the current sanctions" nonsense
Nagging, not knowing what they want, not proposing any solution beside compulsive nagging, no one knows since their posts are limited to the same kind of answers, racial slurs, "mullah"
The same in the IRIAF thread, nagging and nagging, Iran will never achieve anything
And the same suspects ironically calls everyone not acknowledging their nagging and narrative as "head in the sand"
When something is talked about "This is propaganda"
And when something is achieved: "This is not enough" "This is old technology" "It will never be produced"
Everyone understands, Iran is going to fall, Iran is bowing down to the US, Iran is going to dismantle everything, IR is going to fall, IRIAF have 1M$ of budget, Iran is going to get bombed by GBU-28 easily. everything is skyrocketing this is nearly the end.
Absolutely. It was the best way to get out of the mess previous administrations had created. But now Iran needs leverage, not to bow to the will of the US without a deal and the benefits that brings.The user in question is on the record for explicitly supporting the JCPOA and the western-leaning factions which brought it about
Don't remember that clause in the JCPOA.and whose goal it was to negotiate away Iran's regional alliances
Ditto.and missiles as well
Ha! Please. That same administration that tried to reach a watered down (and much worse) version of the JCPOA but couldn't because the West didn't want to deal with Iran shortly after wide scale protests, you mean., before the Ra'isi administration put a halt to it.
Absolutely. It was the best way to get out of the mess previous administrations had created. But now Iran needs leverage, not to bow to the will of the US without a deal and the benefits that brings.
Don't remember that clause in the JCPOA.
That same administration that tried to reach a watered down (and much worse) version of the JCPOA
but couldn't because the West didn't want to deal with Iran shortly after wide scale protests, you mean.
Transient restrictions while sanctions are lifted and Iran can close the UNSC nuclear file while it develops more powerful centrifuges that will be ready for mass production when the restrictions expireJCPOA: enrichment limited to below 5% and restrictions placed on stockpiles, which the user is okay with.
Instead of building leverage by accelerating the pace of enrichment to 60%, Iran voluntarily decides to REDUCE the pace of enrichment to 60%. GeniusCurrent state of affairs: Iran has and will continue to enrich at 60% (albeit at slightly slower pace if that report were to be true), will keep her 60% enriched uranium and is facing no limitations on stockpiles. The user calls it "treason".
No deal is perfect, but it was a good deal for Iran at the time, hence why the entire SNSC supported it, including your infallible hero KhameneiAlso no, the JCPOA was not ideal in any shape or form.
You claim victory from that? PatheticAnd when it comes to the USA's will, the fact that they would no longer dare formulate demands like Pompeo's infamous twelve points is due to the current administration's steadfastness and refusal to bow to any imperialist diktat. You're turning reality on its head.
Prove itIt was however the purpose of JCPOA II, part of the program adamantly and avowedly pursued by liberals.
Iran and USA didn't negotiate to restore JCPOA under Raisi?Hogwash, no such thing happened.
The JCPOA was never popular in certain power centres in the US (including congress), and the protests in Iran made the US returning to the JCPOA even more untenable. Basic facts.False logic. If anything, domestic turmoil would have strengthened the west's hand and encouraged them to extract further concession from Iran, but the Ra'isi administration wouldn't go along with such pressure tactics.