@SalarHaqq Jan...I like IR...do not get me wrong..I have praised Raisi government for many of things he has planned and done so far ...the Immigration...he has dropped the ball..as we speak refugees are pouring in...the Vahidi minister in charge better get his act together and tell the nation what he is doing about it.....I do not listen to any Iran opposition propaganda...my take is only based on Iran's official news reports...and I am well aware how enemies will use or mis use all this issues...not green..my dear..
Dear friend, what reliable figures are there to suggest the situation in this regard has been exceptional during the past couple of days where all of a sudden, the topic is making headlines and everyone feels they need to offer their two cents? For as long as I remember, Afghans have been emigrating to Iran and there have been other periods of high intensity movements. Periodically, illegal Afghan migrants were reconducted in numbers to Afghanistan as well.
The problem was just as palpable and present three, four or ten months ago. Why weren't people getting as excited over it back then as they are now? Because "someone" is choosing the "topic of the day", setting the agenda, creating momentum through isolated, symbolic occurrences presented to people in an out-of-context manner, and that "'someone" is also fabricating the two opposite narratives it wants Iranians to confront each other upon - as well as Iranians confronting Afghans, Sunnis confronting Shias and so on.
And as said, there is no quick nor simple fix to the issue although yes, immigration even from Afghanistan, which is an Iranian country, must be regulated and kept within a precisely defined numerical limit, for a series of reasons. However, this panicked reaction of many to a phenomenon that is in essence a slow process, is not rational and here we can clearly see the hands of zio-American social engineers attempting to manufacture and exploit a socially destabilizing trend. We, not the enemy, not Manoto, not Saudi International, not the CIA nor Mossad must have control over the agenda, choose on what day of the week what topic is to be discussed, and what the main sets of contradictory arguments have to be. This is crucial, and this is what I'm trying to explain.
If people do not see action from government they take matters on their own hand and that will not be fair on a poor refugee...you know how ranchers in the US treat Mexican illegals...
Not a great idea honestly, especially if this is what the enemy wants and has prepared accordingly, so as to trigger sustained strife within Iranian society. These sorts of actions will not be of any use in stemming immigration and societal challenges stemming from it. As far the latter are concerned, they risk only getting worse if people act outside of the framework of the law. The government will take action but for any policy to bear fruit, it will take months and years; nothing much can be done in just a matter of days or weeks to reverse migration flows. And if the government appears not to be doing enough, then the same legal avenues used in other matters will need to be invested in order to motivate officials.
There are other creeping existential threats to Iran such as slow demographic growth and various others, yet I don't see nearly as much mobilization when it comes to these - maybe because the enemy, which controls the foreign-based media watched and read by a considerable proportion of Iranians, doesn't want these to be addressed, as opposed to the question of Afghan immigrants - which it wants discussed, but not in an orderly, civil manner but in a hostile and destabilizing fashion.
)
