Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn didnt take them a month to topple imran khan. After he had the audacity to try and act like an independent country with an independent foreign policy
He wasnt even anti-western.
This shows you how easily CIA can infiltrate and take out a foreign head of state if you let them. Lots of parasitic generals with more loyalty to their rank/bank accounts in thr american pockets.
This is exactly the reason why the office of the supreme leader/ guardan council exists.
No other form of Iranian governmebt could withstand western aggression/enslavement. And protect Irans territorial integrity from the zio-american alliance.
Iran is simply too strong for the west to ever chance it becoming hostile again. Make no mistake, the disintegration of the Iranian state is their main goal now.
The Afghan war and its consequences should not be borne by Iran. Totally unjustified.
To be fair he hasn’t done much for Pakistan.
A long line of politicians that do nothing for Pakistan still the same old issues crippling debt, lack of funds, electricity issues, etc etc.
It’s not like this guy was Erodgan who at least since the late 90’s had a phase of impressive economic growth for Turkey before becoming a hallucinating sultan wannabe.
No government is flawlessly perfect. He had the whole covid to deal with and regardless of his performance. There is no way any objective can look at the situation and deny that he was de facto couped out of power by american supported generals.
Its not like all his predecessors were Bismarck level statesmen , he inherited switzerland and turned it into shit.
What happened here lmao the dude got super triggered:
Baghdadi forgot to take his medicine.What happened here lmao the dude got super triggered:
You are contradicting yourself with your story here my friend. First you say Iran aided the US to get rid of radical Talib elements and then you go on to admit that the US was the one who rejected Iranian overtures.Seems you were probably too young to remember.
Iran supported the Afghan war. Just a few years early it almost invaded Afghanistan for the killing of its diplomats by takfiri elements within the Taliban. The government directly aided the Western coalition by activating the Northern Alliance and providing targeting Intel and valuable aid to the Western war effort. It wanted the Taliban toppled.
All it’s goodwill got it landed on the “Axis of Evil” by George W Bush. The government of Iran was stunned.
Then Quds force spent next 20 years playing both sides against each other. (government of Afghan and Taliban)
So let’s not act like Iran is the victim here.
The only point I agree on is that the UN should provide Iran with additional funds on top of the funds it provides Iran for combating drug trafficking into Europe. These additional funds would help stem the economic burden of the refugee crisis to an extent.
But at this point there is no war. These are not refugees anymore. The war is over. You either live in your country or you don’t. Same problem as USA, no matter the economic conditions there are people coming across the border from Mexico and South America. Just like Iranians were trying to make it to Australia the last decade paying smugglers to take them via unstable boats across treacherous waters.
War or no war, Afghans will continue to flow into Iran. It is a country with better conditions and future then their own. This is the basic issue that leads to illegal immigration across the entire world.
No contradiction, just your lack of reading comprehension. Let me break it down for you so you understand:You are contradicting yourself with your story here my friend. First you say Iran aided the US to get rid of radical Talib elements and then you go on to admit that the US was the one who rejected Iranian overtures.
Why should Iran suffer the consequences of the Afghan war? Even if it tried to stabilize Afghanistan many times and even restrained itself from taking tough military action inside Afghanistan.
So, no. Iran is not obliged to take in anymore refugees because it already has enough.
You got to be the slowest member on this whole forum. What part of ''This has nothing to do with Iran'' you not get?No contradiction, just your lack of reading comprehension. Let me break it down for you so you understand:
- Iran aided US greatly during the run up and invasion
- Iran expected a thawing of relations and a possible diplomatic breakthrough for all its work
- US took all that work and then slapped Iran with a terror designation.
- Iran learned the US would never see Iran as a force for good
Iran destabilized Afghanistan by supporting the invasion then destabilized it further by running covert ops against the Afghan government and coalition forces. Pakistan did the same, so did China, so did Russia. Everyone was in there for their own interest.
Just because you say ''there is no war'' does not mean that is the case. Any conflict or its aftermath that causes dislodgment of people from their home is called a refugee crisis.I don’t think you seem to get it. They aren’t refugees there is no more war. They are illegal immigrants trying to find a better life.
US faces the same problem at its Southern Border. Is it US fault that economic conditions and political conditions in Mexico and South American is poor? Yes and no (just like Iran). But at the end of the day people will immigrate to the country that has the better opportunity wether legally or illegally.
Nope, was not the case during the Shah era. Even the soviet war in Afghanistan did not cause so much Afghans into coming to Iran. Ever since your American lords invaded that nation and destabilized it the stream of refugees from Afgh to Iran intensified.So even if there was no Afghan war, Afghans would still be coming over into Iran.
You see, there's an issue here. A little caveat. A little hair in the soup: We do not have any humanitarian or legal obligation to accept them and provide them with a better life. We are not under any obligation to even help them.No contradiction, just your lack of reading comprehension. Let me break it down for you so you understand:
- Iran aided US greatly during the run up and invasion
- Iran expected a thawing of relations and a possible diplomatic breakthrough for all its work
- US took all that work and then slapped Iran with a terror designation.
- Iran learned the US would never see Iran as a force for good
Iran destabilized Afghanistan by supporting the invasion then destabilized it further by running covert ops against the Afghan government and coalition forces. Pakistan did the same, so did China, so did Russia. Everyone was in there for their own interest.
I don’t think you seem to get it. They aren’t refugees there is no more war. They are illegal immigrants trying to find a better life.
US faces the same problem at its Southern Border. Is it US fault that economic conditions and political conditions in Mexico and South American is poor? Yes and no (just like Iran). But at the end of the day people will immigrate to the country that has the better opportunity wether legally or illegally.
So even if there was no Afghan war, Afghans would still be coming over into Iran.