What's new

Iranian Chill Thread

. .
@SalarHaqq
باز بشین مثل کبک سرت رو بکن زیر برف و یک طومار چرت و پرت بنویس که نرخ باروری ایران ۲.۱ هست بعد هم آخر سر بگو اثبات کردی. این رو مشاور وزیر بهداشت گفته


اتفاقات اعجاب‌آوری که درباره جمعیت در کشور رخ داده، واقعا قابل قبول نیست که ببینیم و حرف نزنیم؛ چه برای افرادی که مذهبی هستند و چه برای افرادی که قانونمند و حقوق‌دانند و چه برای کسانیکه تخصص دارند و ابراز علم می‌کنند. اکنون میزان باروری کلی در کشور ما حدود ۱.۶ شده است. یعنی حتما جمعیت افولی است. رشد جمعیت شش دهم است و به زودی به صفر می‌رسد
 
.
@SalarHaqq
باز بشین مثل کبک سرت رو بکن زیر برف و یک طومار چرت و پرت بنویس که نرخ باروری ایران ۲.۱ هست بعد هم آخر سر بگو اثبات کردی. این رو مشاور وزیر بهداشت گفته


اتفاقات اعجاب‌آوری که درباره جمعیت در کشور رخ داده، واقعا قابل قبول نیست که ببینیم و حرف نزنیم؛ چه برای افرادی که مذهبی هستند و چه برای افرادی که قانونمند و حقوق‌دانند و چه برای کسانیکه تخصص دارند و ابراز علم می‌کنند. اکنون میزان باروری کلی در کشور ما حدود ۱.۶ شده است. یعنی حتما جمعیت افولی است. رشد جمعیت شش دهم است و به زودی به صفر می‌رسد
well as far as I believe growth rate must be between 0 to 1 and more than that is not sustainable
 
.
well as far as I believe growth rate must be between 0 to 1 and more than that is not sustainable
The problem is with the fertility rate which is well-below the replacement level. The population growth rate is obviously correlated to it, but the fertility rate is more intuitive and easier to judge. A fertility rate of 2 is the minimum for children to replace their parents. A fertility rate of 2.1 is suggested to be ideal to account for other factors such as a male-biased sex ratio in most countries (usually the male:female ratio is about 1.05 for most countries).
 
.
The problem is with the fertility rate which is well-below the replacement level. The population growth rate is obviously correlated to it, but the fertility rate is more intuitive and easier to judge. A fertility rate of 2 is the minimum for children to replace their parents. A fertility rate of 2.1 is suggested to be ideal to account for other factors such as a male-biased sex ratio in most countries (usually the male:female ratio is about 1.05 for most countries).

یه نگاه به اطراف بکنین
به رفقای راهنمایی و دبیرستان
وضعیت رشد جمعیت بحرانیه

دخترهای مجرد چهل ساله زیادن
که البته با پز مدرنیته صورتشونو سرخ نگه میدارن ولی از درون جوشانن

باید فکر قوی و پر جرات کرد وگرنه منفی هم میشیم

تعارف نداره
خیلی خطرناکه وضعیت​
 
. .
یه نگاه به اطراف بکنین
به رفقای راهنمایی و دبیرستان
وضعیت رشد جمعیت بحرانیه

دخترهای مجرد چهل ساله زیادن
که البته با پز مدرنیته صورتشونو سرخ نگه میدارن ولی از درون جوشانن

باید فکر قوی و پر جرات کرد وگرنه منفی هم میشیم

تعارف نداره
خیلی خطرناکه وضعیت​
حتما شرایط ازدواج فراهم نیست
 
.
@SalarHaqq
باز بشین مثل کبک سرت رو بکن زیر برف و یک طومار چرت و پرت بنویس که نرخ باروری ایران ۲.۱ هست بعد هم آخر سر بگو اثبات کردی. این رو مشاور وزیر بهداشت گفته


اتفاقات اعجاب‌آوری که درباره جمعیت در کشور رخ داده، واقعا قابل قبول نیست که ببینیم و حرف نزنیم؛ چه برای افرادی که مذهبی هستند و چه برای افرادی که قانونمند و حقوق‌دانند و چه برای کسانیکه تخصص دارند و ابراز علم می‌کنند. اکنون میزان باروری کلی در کشور ما حدود ۱.۶ شده است. یعنی حتما جمعیت افولی است. رشد جمعیت شش دهم است و به زودی به صفر می‌رسد


Avvalan ke khāheshmand hastam ye nafase 'amigh bekeshid, zirā hich lozumi nabud chenin lahni rā bekār bebarid. Ettefāghan benazar miresad ma'nāye ezhārāte bande rā sad dar sad motevadje nashode bāshid.

Here's what I am and have been saying before:

1) There is no consensus on demographic and other social and economical statistics in Iran. Different organs and officials publish conflicting figures, which in and by itself is a huge problem that reflects an improper politicization of statistical surveys.

What this member of the liberal, incompetent if not treasonous Rohani administration has claimed about Iran's fertility rate, should therefore not necessarily be taken as gospel.

2) But even if we assume he is right with his near 1.6 fertility rate figure - it is still false to claim that this is due to the Islamic Republic trying to uphold Tradition or implementing sharia law. It is just as erroneous to assume that secularization of governance and law will lead to a reversal of this demographic trend.

A country such as Turkey, which you cited as a counter-example, and which indeed is a secular state that does not apply sharia law, is not doing any better than Islamic Iran in terms of its fertility rate. Turkey too has a fertility rate lower than 2.1, in other words generational replacement is jeopardized in Turkey as well.

Here is evidence from a Turkish news service: https://www.trtworld.com/turkey/turkey-s-fertility-rate-outpaces-27-eu-member-states-45274

In 2019, Turkey's fertility rate was of 1.88 only. And that even made Turkey a leader in Europe, since it outpaced all of the 27 EU member states with such a weak and insufficient figure.

I hope you realize what this means. It simply means that if you suppress sharia law and move towards secularization of the state and politics, and if you marginalize religious education and public discourse in Iran, you will not solve Iran's fertility rate problem, and in fact you'll make it even worse. As a matter of fact, when the application of sharia law was strictest in modern day Iran, i. e. during the 1980's, Iran also had one of the highest fertility rates in the world.

3) The two actual reasons behind Iran's demographic issues are the following:

- Liberal propaganda and social engineering beamed into Iran around the clock by foreign Farsi-language media owned by the Iranian nation's existential enemies (zionist regime, USA and its NATO allies including the EU regimes, Haifan Bahai organization, international globalist and zionist oligarchy), both through satellite TV and the internet.
This encourages Iranians to adopt western decadent lifestyles which are not conducive to a cohesive family life nor to natality, and to disregard their civilizational values (whether Islamic or pre-Islamic) necessary for a healthy and sustained demographic self-preservation.

- Modernization and urbanization of society. This includes increased participation of women in public and economic life, which the Islamic Republic not only did not oppose, but actively encouraged and promoted, as we all know. When some 60% of university students are females, and when more and more Iranian women are active on the job market instead of fulfilling their traditional duties, we need to take a step back, pause a little bit and reflect deeply. Modernization and so-called "enhancement of the role of women" are all fine and dandy, but not when they come at the price of the nation's survival.

And no, you will not find a counter-example anywhere of a society that trod his path of "modernity" without encountering demographic ageing issues, be it in the west - which is the most affected of all, or in relatively developed Muslim countries such as Turkey or Malaysia.

4) I never ever claimed this is not a serious, urgent, pressing challenge and even a threat to Iran's survival as a nation and civilization.
So please don't suggest I was trying to deny or cover it up. On the contrary, there is a comment of mine on this forum where I labeled the demographic question a "ticking time bomb" for Iran. My issue is with your analysis of the reasons which led to this situation, as well as with the proposed solutions stemming from said analysis. And above I showed why. More modernism, more liberalism or a move towards secularism are not the solution. They would doubtlessly be a recipe for complete disaster and for national mass suicide.

There's only one solution, and Iranian authorities better enact it before it's too late: classical family support measures by the government, subsidies and other advantages for married couples with more than two children, in addition to appropriate and intensive national information campaigns plus social counter-engineering. Va salām shod tamām.

On a sidenote: the revolutionary forces in Iran are weak at social engineering. They are proficient and often outright excel at managing preexisting and evolving social circumstances at a grassroots level - something shahid Soleimani famously referred to as "turning threats into opportunities". But they have hardly ever engaged in proper social engineering, perhaps due to their lofty ethical standards, given that social engineering largely consists in modifying behavior durably and independently of the will of those subjected to it, and even against their will if necessary, as if conducting a laboratory experiment on them. One can also understand why mo'mens might be reluctant to engage in a domain which might be interpreted as something that God only ought to have a monopoly on (but this might be debatable from a theological viewpoint). As far as the liberal fifth column is concerned, it too lacks the means to conduct proper social engineering. However, contrary to the revolutionary factions, the liberals act as second grade relays of social engineering endeavours carried through from abroad by Iran's existential enemies.
 
Last edited:
.
حتما شرایط ازدواج فراهم نیست

خیلی هاشون از من و شما پولدارترن

البته ترس از طلاق و مهریه و نبود کیس مناسب و سخت پسند بودن و علاقه به پوووز زنی در امر ازدواج هم جزو سختی های ازدواجه
 
. .
How do get that mark? I always use aa and the words sometimes look funky when typing finglish.

That grapheme is called "macron" (used among others in transliteration of Japanese). Search for "A macron" on a search engine or on Wikipedia, find a lower case a-letter with macron, copy it into the cache and then paste where needed.

Here for instance: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ā
 
Last edited:
.
Avvalan ke khāheshmand hastam ye nafase 'amigh bekeshid, zirā hich lozumi nabud chenin lahni rā bekār bebarid. Ettefāghan benazar miresad ma'nāye ezhārāte bande rā sad dar sad motevadje nashode bāshid.

Here's what I am and have been saying before:

1) There is no consensus on demographic and other social, demographic and economical statistics in Iran. Different organs and officials publish conflicting figures, which in and by itself is a huge issue that reflects an improper politicization of statistical surveys.

What this member of the liberal, incompetent if not treasonous Rohani administration has claimed about Iran's fertility rate, should therefore not necessarily be taken as gospel.

2) But even if we assume he is right with his 1.6 fertility rate figure - it is still completely false to claim that this is due to the Islamic Republic trying to uphold Tradition or implementing sharia law. It is just as erroneous to assume that secularization of governance and law will lead to a reversal of this demographic trend.

A country such as Turkey, which you cited as a counter-example, and which indeed is a secular state that does not apply sharia law, is not doing any better than Islamic Iran in terms of its fertility rate. Turkey too has a fertility rate lower than 2.1, i.e. generational replacement is jeopardized in Turkey as well!

Here is evidence from a Turkish news service: https://www.trtworld.com/turkey/turkey-s-fertility-rate-outpaces-27-eu-member-states-45274

In 2019, Turkey's fertility rate was of 1.88 only. And that even made Turkey a leader in Europe, since it outpaced all of the 27 EU member states with such a weak and insufficient figure.

I hope you realize what this means. It simply means that if you suppress sharia law and move towards secularization of the state and politics, and if you marginalize religious education and public discourse in Iran, you will not solve Iran's low fertility rate problem, and in fact you'll make it even worse!

3) The two actual reasons behind Iran's acute demographic problem are the following:

- Liberal propaganda and social engineering beamed into Iran around the clock by foreign Farsi-language media funded by the Iranian nation's existential enemies (zionist regime, USA and its NATO allies including the EU regimes, Haifan Bahai organization and international globalist and zionist oligarchy), both on satellite TV and on the internet.
This encourages Iranians to adopt western decadent lifestyles which are not conducive to a cohesive family life and to natality.

- Modernization and urbanization of the society. That includes increased participation of women in public and economic life, which the Islamic Republic not only did not oppose, but actively encouraged and promoted, as we all know. When over 50% of university students are females, and when more and more Iranian women are active on the job market instead of fulfilling their traditional roles, we need to take a step back, pause a little bit and reflect deeply. Modernization and so-called "enhancement of the role of women" are all fine and dandy, but not when they come at the price of the nation's survival.

And no, you will not find a counter-example anywhere in the world of a society that trod his path of "modernity" and did not encounter demographic ageing issues, be it in the west - which is the most affected of all, or in relatively developed Muslim countries such as Turkey or Malaysia.

4) I never ever claimed this is not a serious, urgent, pressing, existential challenge and even a threat to Iran's survival as a nation and civilization.
So please don't suggest I was trying to deny or cover it up. On the contrary, there is a comment of mine somewhere where I labeled the demographic question as a "ticking time bomb" for Iran. My issue is with your analysis of the reasons that led to this situation, as well as with the proposed solutions that stem from any such analysis. And above I proved why. More modernism, more liberalism or a move towards secularism are not the solution. In fact they would be a recipe for total disaster and for national mass suicide.

There's only one solution, and Iranian authorities better enact it before it's too late: classical family support measures by the government, subsidies and other advantages for married couples with more than two children, in addition to appropriate and intensive national information campaigns and social counter-engineering. Va salām shod tamām.
دقیقاً همونی شد که گفتم. گفتم الان میای یه طومار چیزهای بی‌ربط می‌نویسی

گفته بودی که آمار ایران بالاتر از کشورهای منطقه و اروپایی هست و حتی گزارشی که از مشرق نیوز برات فرستاده بودم که رهبر به وزارت بهداشت توپیده بود رو زیر سئوال بردی گفتی درست نیست. نرخ باروری ۱.۶ یعنی در حد کشورهای شمال اروپا و اروپای غربی. حتی پایین‌تر از کشورهایی مثل فرانسه و سوئد و دانمارک و در حد کشوری مثل آلمان

با دو تفاوت خیلی عمده البته. یکی اینکه این کشورهای اروپایی تمام توسعه یافته هستن ولی ما هنوز در حال توسعه هستیم و دو اینکه این کشورهای اروپایی که نرخ باروری پایین دارن لااقل نرخ مهاجرت بالا دارن که باعث می‌شه نیروی انسانی تأمین بشه اما در ایران نرخ مهاجرت هم سالهاست به سمت شدید منفی شدن رفته، حتی با وجود مهاجرین افغان که حتی خوندن و نوشتن هم بلد نیستن. نخبگان علمی و ورزشی و اقتصادی (به جز شارلاتان‌های وابسته به نظام که اختلاس‌های چندهزار میلیاردی می‌کنند) رو داریم می‌دیم به کشورهای دیگه و جاش مهاجرینی رو می‌گیریم که حتی خوندن و نوشتن هم بلد نیستن بیشترشون و برخیشون اصلاً با فرهنگ‌های متضاد با ما هستن مثل پشتون‌ها

یعنی به نوعی داریم گند می‌زنیم به خزانه ژنتیکی کشور و ارزش‌های جامعه. آدم‌های باهوش، قد بلند و ورزشکار و پولدار و کارآفرین رو می‌ذاریم از ایران خارج بشن و بعد بهشون فحش می‌دیم که شما وطن فروشین و ... و جاش افرادی میان که حتی از متوسط جامعه ایران هم پایین‌تر هستند و برخیشون ته دلشون ایرانی‌ها رو کافر می‌دونند

خود این آمار حرف تو رو نقض می‌کنه. اگر قرار بود شریعت اسلام باعث جلوگیری از پایین اومدن نرخ باروری بشه که آمار ایران به عنوان تنها کشوری که داره شریعت اسلام رو واقعاً پیاده می‌کنه این شکلی نبود. بیشترین نرخ باروری تو کشورهای آفریقایی هست که بیشترشون مسلمون هم نیستن. خیلی‌هاشون هنوز قبایلی دارن که مردم توش لخت هستن ولی نرخ باروریشون چندبرابر کشورهای دیگه هست

ترکیه که سکولار هست نرخ باروری بیشتری از ما داره که نزدیک ۲ هست. تقریباً همه کشورهای هم فرهنگ ما تو منطقه که مثل ما مذهب رو تو حلق ملت نمی‌کنند نرخ باروری بیشتری از ما دارن. لبنانی که مردمش یکی از سکولارترین مردمان منطقه هستن نرخ باروریشون بالای ۲ هست. سوریه که هم سکولار هستند هم جنگ زده هستند نرخ باروریشون ۲.۷ هست. عراق ۳.۵ هست و آذربایجان شوروی ۲ هست و تقریباً هر کشوری که کنار دست ما نگاه کنی همین وضعیت هست و فقط مایی که از دید تو بهترین کشور جهان هستیم در منطقه شدیدترین مشکلات دموگرافیک رو داریم​
 
.
گفته بودی که آمار ایران بالاتر از کشورهای منطقه و اروپایی هست و حتی گزارشی که از مشرق نیوز برات فرستاده بودم که رهبر به وزارت بهداشت توپیده بود رو زیر سئوال بردی گفتی درست نیست. نرخ باروری ۱.۶ یعنی در حد کشورهای شمال اروپا و اروپای غربی. حتی پایین‌تر از کشورهایی مثل فرانسه و سوئد و دانمارک و در حد کشوری مثل آلمان​

The fact that there are conflicting statistics about Iran and that none of us has the means to verify which figure is accurate, is not unrelated to the discussion.

Germany's fertility rate was of 1.596 births per woman in 2020, so Iran is not doing worse than them. Also, birthrates in western Europe tend to be artificially bloated by mass immigration from developing nations.


با دو تفاوت خیلی عمده البته. یکی اینکه این کشورهای اروپایی تمام توسعه یافته هستن ولی ما هنوز در حال توسعه هستیم و دو اینکه این کشورهای اروپایی که نرخ باروری پایین دارن لااقل نرخ مهاجرت بالا دارن که باعث می‌شه نیروی انسانی تأمین بشه اما در ایران نرخ مهاجرت هم سالهاست به سمت شدید منفی شدن رفته، حتی با وجود مهاجرین افغان که حتی خوندن و نوشتن هم بلد نیستن

I mentioned Turkey's fertility rate of a mere 1.88. Turkey's HDI is hardly superior to Iran's while its fertility rate is very close if not inferior (since none of us knows which figure given for Iran is the correct one). So, one cannot say that only the most developed countries experience demographic transition.

The same example of Turkey proves that secularization isn't a solution to the issue. Hence, there are no grounds to single out the Islamic Repunlic or to blame its theocratic nature for Iran's current fertility rate. Doing so wouldn't be scientific at all. Not least because when sharia law used to be implemented in the strictest way, that is during the 1980's - as opposed to nowadays, Iran's fertility rate was one of the most elevated on earth.


نخبگان علمی و ورزشی و اقتصادی (به جز شارلاتان‌های وابسته به نظام که اختلاس‌های چندهزار میلیاردی می‌کنند) رو داریم می‌دیم به کشورهای دیگه و جاش مهاجرینی رو می‌گیریم که حتی خوندن و نوشتن هم بلد نیستن بیشترشون و برخیشون اصلاً با فرهنگ‌های متضاد با ما هستن مثل پشتون‌ها
The so-called brain drain supposedly affecting Iran is vastly exaggerated in popular representations.

Considering the quantity of highly qualified personnel that the national economy of Iran is able to absorb, the fact is that Iran's universities are producing a surplus of graduates, therefore emigration of some is a necessity even.

A second fact is that in reality and contrary to the anti-IR propaganda peddled by media and gossip left and right, Iran has a pretty low rate of emigration. Iranian overseas communities are not particularly numerous in international comparison. A country such as south Korea (known as the "suicide capital of the world"), whose average education level is superior to Iran's, has a significantly higher proportion of nationals living abroad compared to Iran. And those south Korean emigrants are anything but under-educated.

Also, thank God Iran is not a destination for mass immigration, and luckily the only large group of permanent immigrant residents (i. e. Afghans) are linguistically and culturally speaking almost identical to the locals. Erosion of national identity and of local specificity are a consequence of mass immigration from culturally alien spots, as can be observed everywhere in western Europe. Definitely not something an Iranian patriot should long for.

As for the Afghan immigrants, they are filling a relative void on the job market, by taking care of tasks less and less Iranians are willing to carry out.

Last but not least, let us not underestimate the power of the Persian-language media funded by Iran's foreign enemies, and well as their ability to brainwash educated Iranians into idealizing the west while looking down on their own country in a completely unjustified manner. I said it before, the sheer magnitude and perfidy of the anti-IR propaganda machine put in place by NATO regimes and the globalist oligarchy, is unprecedented in human history. Once again, take that factor out of the equation and the number of educated Iranians willing to leave their country will suddenly decrease in a sharp and sudden manner.

یعنی به نوعی داریم گند می‌زنیم به خزانه ژنتیکی کشور و ارزش‌های جامعه. آدم‌های باهوش، قد بلند و ورزشکار و پولدار و کارآفرین رو می‌ذاریم از ایران خارج بشن و بعد بهشون فحش می‌دیم که شما وطن فروشین و ... و جاش افرادی میان که حتی از متوسط جامعه ایران هم پایین‌تر هستند و برخیشون ته دلشون ایرانی‌ها رو کافر می‌دونند
We are not causing this. Our enemies are for the most part, with their incessant propaganda and social engineering, whose considerable effects cannot be understated.

Even so, for a developing country Iran is doing well in the stated areas. Lots of developed, industrialized nations are worse off than Iran when it comes to emigration, brain drain, and so on.

As for "tall people", I'm not sure whether this is serious...? The token number of athletes leaving Iran after being brainwashed by western and zionist propaganda, are not going to affect the average height of Iranians. Never mind the fact that athletes aren't necessarily tall. Lots of spite for the Islamic Republic can be sensed in the above quoted words, and it seems this spite can at times lead to outlandish claims.


خود این آمار حرف تو رو نقض می‌کنه. اگر قرار بود شریعت اسلام باعث جلوگیری از پایین اومدن نرخ باروری بشه که آمار ایران به عنوان تنها کشوری که داره شریعت اسلام رو واقعاً پیاده می‌کنه این شکلی نبود. بیشترین نرخ باروری تو کشورهای آفریقایی هست که بیشترشون مسلمون هم نیستن. خیلی‌هاشون هنوز قبایلی دارن که مردم توش لخت هستن ولی نرخ باروریشون چندبرابر کشورهای دیگه هست
I didn't claim sharia law guarantees high fertility rates. All I pointed to, and my point stands, is that sharia law is not the cause for the decrease in birthrates. The comparison with Turkey provides undeniable proof of this. Turkey too has seen its fertility rate decrease continuously, so much so that it has now fallen below the 2.1 limit necessary for generational renewal.

Then again, one of the main factors I highlighted is being ignored, and that is the incomparably massive amount of propaganda and social engineering Iranians are subjected to, as opposed to Turks or others.

So yes, if it takes such a humongous propaganda campaign to push down Iran's fertility rate, then theocracy is arguably quite the barrier against undesirable demographic recession. What remains to be done now is to neutralize the enemy's soft war, and to implement adequate countermeasures such as the ones I alluded to before.


ترکیه که سکولار هست نرخ باروری بیشتری از ما داره.
We're discussing whether the replacement of generations is ensured or not. And with a fertility rate of 1.88, secular Turkey is visibly failing in this department.

Furthermore the Turkish population are not being subjected to the kind of propaganda campaign Iranians are suffering from. Because their regime is secular already - it ensures demographic decay all by itself, by virtue if its nature. No gazillion anti-regime sites or social media accounts are required for Turkey, nor dozens of BBC / Manoto type satellite broadcasters.


لبنانی که مردمش یکی از سکولارترین مردمان منطقه هستن نرخ باروریشون بالای ۲ هست. سوریه که هم سکولار هستند هم جنگ زده هستند نرخ باروریشون ۲.۷ هست. عراق ۳.۵ هست و آذربایجان شوروی ۲ هست و تقریباً هر کشوری که کنار دست ما نگاه کنی همین وضعیت هست

Being at war does not necessarily hamper birthrates. When Islamic Iran was itself in an armed conflict between 1980 and 1988, it also registered extremely elevated fertility rates. So this does not invalidate my point.

The mentioned countries for the most part are not as developed as Iran. With social development, with urbanization, with modernization comes decrease in birthrates.

And, none of their populations is exposed to the type of massive, omnipresent liberal propaganda, psy-ops and social engineering endeavour which Iranians are suffering from, propaganda which takes aim at the nuclear family structure and at traditional values and lifestyles, inoculates unrealistically bleak future perspectives and thereby mechanically lowers people's incentive and motivation for procreation.
 
Last edited:
.
Do we have a Scottish member? I want to evaluate my favorite candidates!

3127842.jpg
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom