Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hey man, long time no see.
First of all, I have posted a video of a man named Yousof Abazari, whom is a professor at UT, in a couple of posts back, that I like you to hear.
You know what's the guy trying to say, he literally controls himself not to explode somehow in anger, but for what?
Is he really mad at that passed away singer, not at all, he is just an elite (I know the guy in person) whom sees the problem with the society around but finds himself hands tied to be a source of reconciliation.
In fact the power and the force to make difference and to make enhance is bursting in the forms of anger and insults.
Now going on, the difference of the ideology between you and me takes place.
You believe, he is just another example of growling elites of a third world society, but I believe he is just another Oleg Losev going down the drain.
Let me instead of giving you an answer, represent a double, you can never reject anyone, neither do you, nor do anyone in whole the universe:
Oleg Losev is a shining man rising in a harsh hell of situation as you described, but could you count me the number of so many potent to-be-Oleg Losev's that couldn't find the opportunity to rise, just because that not-demanding of a situation?
And there are sure other example of societies that the environment is just perfectly prepared for geniuses like Einstein to grow, but could you tell me why aren't we witnessing Einstein's on daily frequencies, neither in weekly or yearly or centuries?
Those familiar with math would hold to the answer very fast;
It's true that you need a society of people raised genius to make possible for a star to shine, but you also need the basic elements in that society to make it possible for the stars to rise and shine.
Finally the point to your answer is, you need A and B simultaneously to have C, but in the absence of B, you can't justify the lack of C as a proof of shortage in A.
Fahmidane in ghesmate akharesho mizaram be onvane yek open challenge.
Oleg Losev is a shining man rising in a harsh hell of situation as you described, but could you count me the number of so many potent to-be-Oleg Losev's that couldn't find the opportunity to rise, just because that not-demanding of a situation?
And there are sure other example of societies that the environment is just perfectly prepared for geniuses like Einstein to grow, but could you tell me why aren't we witnessing Einstein's on daily frequencies, neither in weekly or yearly or centuries?
Those familiar with math would hold to the answer very fast;
It's true that you need a society of people raised genius to make possible for a star to shine, but you also need the basic elements in that society to make it possible for the stars to rise and shine.
Finally the point to your answer is, you need A and B simultaneously to have C, but in the absence of B, you can't justify the lack of C as a proof of shortage in A.
Fahmidane in ghesmate akharesho mizaram be onvane yek open challenge.
Ops, sorry, maybe my bad, Although I'm glad you have watched that other video in which that young Zakeri guy (whom is a student of social science at UT) is speaking (and for your happiness of opened up situation, I wouldn't be sure as he might be in some place he deserves at the moment). But form the video I mentioned I meant the video in this post: (This is Yousof Abazari a Ut prof)I watched your video. I agree with your friend in the video. Social sciences should not be interfered with. Generally the whole academic arena should not be interfered with. Academic freedom must be allowed without which the society can not progress. Academic work should have immunity from any kind of prosecution. The idiots who believe otherwise are no different than Taliban ideologically (who had banned TV as a "bad" Western thing and girls education as a "bad Western value"). Almost everything was invented in West, including the camera, microphone and the fashionable cloths the opponents of "Western" social sciences wear (Textile industry mostly uses German machines worldwide). Maybe before they trying to debunk social sciences because it comes from West, they should disrobe, and run to a hole like a naked mouse away from cameras, microphones and light bulbs.
But when I was in Iran, such debates were not possible on TV. Actually no body even thought something like this was possible. Knowing that Iranian TV is not free and guests are vetted for appearance, it means only one thing, that the government actually has allowed it. This is a positive sign and omen. It is better and more efficient to debunk the idiots on national TV than on streets. As for the dude who is imprisoned, I here paraphrase Ovid: "Only the mind can not be sent to prison [exile]."
But as for the substance of the video, I am sorry to say that I am not impressed. It was all emotionalism with no science in it. What social experiments these professors of UT have done to scientifically discover the causes of ills in society? Beyond a few statistical figures what do we know? It is fun to know about the increase in rospigari but I want to know how much of it is due to socio-economic pressures and how much due to the change in social and specially women attitudes towards it? Did any one of these so called professors write any report like the one written by professor William Beveridge (the Oleg Losev of social sciences)? Or no, all they can do is become emotional and angry? Doctor @New when we are going to stop pretending to be something we are not? Your friend is no Oleg Losev. And no, your mere personal acquaintance does not qualify him to be accepted as Oleg Losev either. If you want to talk about progressive social science then bring me someone like professor Beveridge not an emotional young man. Bring me a social critic like Charles Dickens in Iran, whose love for children had a huge impact on forming of pediatrics and social welfare for children.
Vow you tajrobi guys, it was always a never proven rumor, but we all know it was true, you guys succk in math and logic.That's lame. In philosophy it is called a logical fallacy. A thought-terminating cliché . A fallacy of false attribution. An ignoratio elenchi. But it is ok. Wont matter. I let you go this time.
That is AND gate, by the way. And has no relation to what we are debating.
i loved then end when the idiot dude got backstabbed by herDownload Ex Machina guys.
Ops, sorry, maybe my bad, Although I'm glad you have watched that other video in which that young Zakeri guy (whom is a student of social science at UT) is speaking (and for your happiness of opened up situation, I wouldn't be sure as he might be in some place he deserves at the moment). But form the video I mentioned I meant the video in this post: (This is Yousof Abazari a Ut prof)
Iranian Chill Thread | Page 1579
Right now, I am far from home so let's discuss the content of your post when I got home this evening.
Vow you tajrobi guys, it was always a never proven rumor, but we all know it was true, you guys succk in math and logic.
Hey dude, I feel I am watching the visual translation of a long wall of words made just to denounce a character.That was audio. Not video. And the guy is a complete idiot. Far from being a genius, he is not even capable of normal rationality. All emotionalism and hype, completely lacking in substantive arguments. His personal opinions do not qualify as science no matter how much emotionally charged they are. I wonder if he even knows what is the difference between an argument and an opinion. No wonder Iran can not change its destiny if these are its Oleg Losevs.
In West such people are known as third grade public speakers. They entertain people in corners of bookshops speaking to young couples or occasionally if they have a humorous side become comedians with late night TV shows, making people feel stupid, just before bedtime. Kind of like adult bedtime stories which get them high and cozy in their communal egalitarian stupidity, just before sex and sleep.
Science and scientists, Oleg Losevs and his colleagues are busy in creating new things. They can not be compared to these idiots whose social purpose is to jerk off the society. But this idiot friend of yours has crossed all boundaries of irrationality and is posing his emotional opinion as groundbreaking thoughts. As if cumulative social emotion should be per his wishes even down to their choice of favorite young cancer victim singer. Its another manifestation of Talibanism in our society, but with difference that while religious zealots used to blackmail people not to listen to Hayedeh this idiot "modern" zealot is blackmailing people not to listen to Pashayi (or whoever he is, since I am not much into music scene). Namordiomo in roshanfekriton ham didim.
For this part,you need to know that through my words no insult were intended, but you need also to accept the teasing truth either.Argumentum ad hominum. Not else was expected either.
It's banned in the US. Legal in Canada though. The FDA says the small little bits and pieces in the chocolate could be mistakenly swallowed by a child.
It's banned in the US. Legal in Canada though. The FDA says the small little bits and pieces in the chocolate could be mistakenly swallowed by a child.
You never bought any in Iran? Basically it's a hollow chocolate egg with collectible toys inside. I loved them when I was a kid. Here in Canada people point out to the eggs in the stores and say "did you know kinder eggs are banned in the US? Stupid Americans."Abii, Tokhm morgh e shaansi chi hast? Mage inhaa ke yek asbaab baazi ye shaansi toush hast, nistesh? Mageh tokhm e morgh shaansi khordani hast?
You never bought any in Iran? Basically it's a hollow chocolate egg with collectible toys inside. I loved them when I was a kid. Here in Canada people point out to the eggs in the stores and say "did you know kinder eggs are banned in the US? Stupid Americans."
lol that's how I knew they were banned in the US.