explain to me how killing a girl in police custody
Amini was not killed in custody, this much is firmly established by now.
CCTV footage was released showing her walking out of the police van in a nonchalant manner with zero signs of physical distress, impairment or pain. Saudi-linked broadcasters - anything but friendly towards the Iranian government, published her CT scans, which prove there was no traumatic injury to the head or torso.
and then shooting dead 300 protestors including women is protecting women?
After rioters started lynching, burning alive, beating to death, stabbing, stoning and firing at law enforcement and pious citizens, encouraged by their western and zionist sponsors.
Around 60 Iranian security personnel were murdered overall. Also armed separatists began shooting at police stations and civil servants.
Try this anywhere in the world and they'll surely gun down 300 and/or way more.
your insults wont hide the fact that the people of Iran have had enough of this hypocrite regime that punishes and represses its people while its selected elites enjoy the luxuries deemed haram for the ordinary Iranians . challenge me on this and I will share this open hypocrisy of the Iranian Mulllahs for all to see.
The question is, which elites enjoy luxuries in Iran? The liberal ones, true. However, those same liberals are opposed to sharia law and to the dress code.
By contrast, the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution is leading a simple and modest life. So are IRGC officers and most of the religiously-inclined revolutionaries. Nobody has anything on them.
Sure, there are exceptions on both sides of the political landscape of the IR, but as a general rule the more supportive of sharia law they are, the less attracted by material wealth they tend to be.
So what is the different with prostitution or free sex in Western world ? Both are also having mutual consent of both male and female. The different is just it is covered by ritual of Shia Islam
The woman must observe
iddah of two monthly cycles after expiration of a mutah contract. This and other limitations mean that prostitution and casual intimate relationships the way they are practiced in the western world, will be made impossible in practice.
In this context I see the Iranian women burning Hijab is not to rebel against Quran, but rebelling against their government hijab enforcement law.
Let me set the facts straight.
The rioters have been following in the footsteps of an anti-clericalist, secularist and partly Islamophobic political tradition which has historical roots in modern day Iranian politics. A political current represented by authors such as Ahmad Kasravi, Ali Dashti and others - you should look these up.
Here's a list of books critical of Islam written by Iranians belonging to that group:
https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/فهرست_کتابهای_ایرانیان_در_نقد_اسلام
This anti-clericalism and borderline or open Islamophobia is now present both among secular Iranian ultra-nationalists and liberal, pro-western Iranian globalists. In the latter camp, a former university professor close to the liberal faction, Javad Tabatabai, told a French newspaper: "in reality, Islam is dead". Rohani then handed him the Farabi International Award. Tabatabai's daughter is working for USA think tanks and also as an adviser to the USA State Department under the Biden regime.
https://www.letemps.ch/opinions/veulent-faire-revivre-lislam-veulent-ressusciter-un-mort
Among other similar actions, rioters and their supporters indulged in:
- Cheering for a mother as she requested to refrain from reciting the Quran at her son's funeral because, so she claimed, he profoundly disliked it.
- Burning a mosque in the city Rasht.
- Assaulting mosque attendants with knives (murdering one) causing some damage the mosque in the holy city of Mashhad.
- Setting fire to religious seminaries.
- Setting fire to the representative office of a jama'at prayer leader.
- Murdering a cleric in Karaj.
- Initiating a campaign to knock off clerics' turbans.
- Chanting slogans like "we are Aryans, we don't worship Arabs".
The least one can say, is that these rioters in their great majority, fervently reject the slightest notion of Islamic governance. A significant portion of them are downright Islamophobic. In parallel, liberal forces within the political system are also pursuing an agenda of secularization, they do not believe in any of the political principles the 1979 Revolution stands for.
In short, Islamic governance is under attack simultaneously from oppositionist rioters and from the liberal faction within the system, both of which are receiving ample support from the zio-American empire.
Kindly inform yourself more in depth. Repeating inaccurate subjective assumptions will not change the ground reality described above.
How did it achieve that goal by torturing this pretty girl, Nika, and throwing her from a building ?
Fake news spread by zionist and western dominated mainstream media.
What "Iran culture" ? This ? You are imposing your own perverse mullah thoughts on Iranis, something that they rejected so vociferously :
They chant "Marg bar dictator", call for overthrow of Mullah Khamenei and his mullah regime and its milita Basij and IRGC and all that whom all you are shilling for here. Are you being more Irani than the Iranis ?
Who is 'they'? These rioters aren't more representative of the Iranian nation than anti-Assad protesters were of the Syrian one.
Did you know that your Mullah Khomenei, the spiritual leader of the fake Islamic revolution of 1979, was sitting comfortably in Paris under the asylum of the French NATO government and that most of the agitation against the shah was done by the Irani leftists including Communists ?
1) The Islamic Revolution lasted for an entire year until its victory. Of this period, Imam Khomeini (rahmatAllah alayha) spent seven months in Iraq, where he had been staying since 1965. However, at the request of the NATO-subservient shah of Iran, Iraqi dictator Saddam expelled the Imam. Nevertheless, the Imam wished to remain in a Moslem country. None was immediately forthcoming, and his advisers compelled him to accept France as a temporary destination, where he spent less than four months.
2) The bulk of revolutionaries were Islamic-oriented and in tune with the revolutionary clergy. "Marxists" formed a minority, which is why they were easily defeated, considering their insufficient popular support, when they tried to topple the revolutionary government through force.
And after that job had been done NATO sent in Mullah Khomenei to Tehran to take over the country because a mullah is what NATO wanted instead of those "abhorrent" commies governing Iran.
Communists didn't stand a chance of securing power in Iran. They were dwarfed politically by Islamic revolutionaries.
The pro-Soviet communist party, Tudeh, was tolerated until 1984. It was banned only when Iranian intelligence discovered it was plotting subversive activities at the behest of an imperialist foreign state.
NATO did not want the spy den calling itself USA embassy in Tehran to be neutralized and taken over by Islamic revolutionaries loyal to Imam Khomeini. NATO did not want the USA military aircraft and special forces sent to extract the American spies from custody, crash in the central Iranian desert. NATO did not want Iran to revise unjust contracts with western oil companies. NATO did not want Iran to execute the leader of the local zionist influence network, Habib Elqanian, and replace the Isra"el"i diplomatic mission in Tehran with a Palestinian one. NATO did not want Iran to found a Resistance Axis stretching to the Levant and fighting zionist occupation of both Palestine and Lebanon. NATO did not want Iran to host about every anti-imperialist liberation movement at conferences or permanent representations in Tehran. NATO did not want Iran to severe ties with apartheid South Africa and start supporting the local resistance, a move which led Nelson Mandela to visit Iran and praise the Islamic Republic in 1992. NATO did not want Iran to become self-sufficient economically and militarily. NATO is outraged at witnessing how Iran thrives under an Islamic system, hence why Iran has been the most sanctioned country on earth. NATO did not want Iran to cooperate with North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and other governments opposed to USA imperialism. NATO did not want Iran to become a source of inspiration for other nations of the global south to regain their independence in the same manner.
Above mentioned feats against NATO designs and many more, weren't achieved by Iranian communists but by the Islamic Republic.
Can't have another country in the Eastern Bloc. So Khomenei grandly stepped off the flight from Paris in 1979 and imposed the hijab among other things and waged war against Socialist Iraq
It was Iraq which started the war by invading Iran with several armored divisions. Not the other way around.
Moreover Iraq was backed to the hilt by both imperialist blocs of the time - including the west. Western regimes assisted Saddam in acquiring and employing chemical weapons on a grand scale against Iranian troops and civilians, with the USA regime going as far as vetoing a UNSC resolution meant to condemn Baghdad's use of WMD. Washington was feeding Baghdad's military with live satellite imagery of Iranian positions. Furthermore, the French regime armed Iraq with top of the line air defence and fighter jets, some of which were flown by French pilots. Whilst the Soviet bloc furnished mountains of equipment to all branches of the Iraqi military.
In 1988 the USA directly entered the war against Iran, striking the Iranian Navy and oil infrastructure in addition to downing an Iranian civilian airliner and causing all on board to be martyred.
Western governments have not once spoken in the United Nations Terrorist Council about their "Right 2 Protect" the Irani people from the oppression and continued murder by the mullahs.
Because they can't. Politically and financially, the cost would not be affordable from the enemy's perspective.
Iran is on a completely different level in terms of deterrence power, than a battered Iraq used to be in 2003. Or that Libya was in 2011 - including because Gaddafi had made the strategic mistake of risking a rapprochement with the west, dismantling Libya's nuclear program and disarming the country to an extent.
They don't attack Iran through direct military aggression, because Iran can strike back with force and inflict considerable damage to their interests. Iraq couldn't, Libya couldn't. They were easy prey, Iran isn't. It's simple as that.
Unlike for the Libyan Jamahiriya in 2011 the Western governments / NATO and the Sunni GCC are not sending a 30+ government military alliance plus thousands of Al Qaeda and so-called Muslim Brotherhood to Iran ruled by Shia mullahs to overthrow the mullahs i.e. do regime change and install a new government. NATO wants the Irani mullahs to stay. Doesn't matter if 1000 more Iranis are murdered by the mullah regime.
That's not correct. "I"SIS conducted a terrorist attack against Iranian worshippers at the holy shrine of Shah Cheraq in Shiraz right at the beginning of the riots. Western-backed, armed separatist grouplets in different regions were activated to launch operations against Iranian forces.
Quantities of illegal arms supplies were located and confiscated by Iranian authorities on several occasions.
https://www.farsnews.ir/en/news/14010816000366/Arms-Carg-Seized-in-Wesern-Nrhwesern-Iran
https://english.almayadeen.net/news...rd-arms-shipment-coming-toward-sistan-and-bal
The violent riots against the Islamic Republic are fully and massively supported by western regimes and their regional clients, as well as by the zionists. Biden of the USA regime declared, "we'll free Iran soon". In Paris, the French regime leader Macron received oppositionist figures whom, claiming a "revolution" was taking place in Iran. Zionist think tank pundits in Occupied Palestine demanded that efforts be made to balkanize and dismantle Iran along "ethno"-linguistic lines.
Western-based Persian language media are openly inciting violence and calling for an overthrow of the Islamic Republic around the clock. Some of these media are bankrolled by the Saudis. So is the MKO terrorist cult, whom the CIA gifted an operational base in Albania. Every opposition group to the Islamic Republic is generously funded and backed by the regimes in Washington and Europe.
english.alarabiya.net
