The high chair you and other commenters speaking from, doesn't apply to Pakistan as people here are not mature enough.
Also soldiers don't give up their citizenship by joining the army. So stop treating them as foreigner.
FYI insult without proof is libel and defamation and against the law.
Applies to soldiers too.
Are you saying that the average Brit is somehow more deserving of democratic self rule and free speech? Or that the average Pakistani is an idiot and too stupid? Let's just say I am perfectly familiar with the outside world, and I have compared the avg Pakistani with people elsewhere, I have faith in my countrymen.
Also... that part in
bold is completely wrong. If I called someone an idiot, would it be libel and defamation until I produced an IQ test that confirmed it?
Please look up libel and defamation, you can have both free speech and also limits to free speech with libel laws. Their application is strict, requires a lot of evidence, and certainly doesn't apply to insults.
I would like to hear an example of "Morally bankrupt general" and comparison of "Morally bankrupt politician" with that?
Apples and oranges.
Why? Do you not believe there are examples of both? I'm sure I don't need to give you examples of civilian leaders, so I'll just give you the example of Ayub Khan, in addition to being a dictator, this morally bankrupt individual oversaw corruption while in office, his family wealth during the mid-60s was estimated by foreign journalists to be in the region of USD10-20m (a lot of money at the time), nepotism whereby he removed highly qualified CSS officers replacing them with cronies, family etc. His corruption also involved taking over or stakes in businesses, the British High Commission commented on how quickly his family developed their wealth in power. In addition, he also went on to oversee the maligning of Fatima Jinnah and the election rigging of the 1965 presidential election. He and his ilk are also credited by some for instigating the Karachi ethnic riots and murder of some opposition.
I'm sure some people on this forum have a rosy image of Ayub, doubtless he comes across as some sort of credible leader who oversaw a lot of progress in the 60s. The truth is altogether worse.
Plus like I said , if you want to treat soldiers like another government servant then the soldiers have every right to behave as government servants behave in Pakistan.
How about everyone behaves and acts professionally and morally at all times, civilian and army? And then we can treat them equally too, you said it yourself armymen are citizens too.
And I am spider man .
On internet anyone can claim to have done anything.
@Jungibaaz in UK people have lost citizenship for speaking against India and supporting Kashmir
Read this
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.c...am-nobody-a-former-british-citizen-speaks-out
From your own website, here's an example of who is being relieved of their citizenship:
https://www.thebureauinvestigates.c...overnment-cracks-down-on-uk-fighters-in-syria
Those laws are there basically to go after individuals against whom there is very credible evidence that their presence would be damaging, e.g returned fighters from Syria, or people who lied in order to gain citizenship but were later found out.