What's new

'INS Vikramaditya will be a game-changer'

:sniper::sniper:One Missile from Pakistan will take down the game changer :) :pakistan::rofl::rofl::rofl::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
Most ships of the previous generation had assisted missile evasion capability. I believe the Indian Navy to be capable enough to keep this contingency in mind.
 
. .
yeah, it was hiding some where deep inside when Pak Navy Submarine was looking for it :rofl::rofl::omghaha:

That was 1965. Your submarine sunk, hunting for it.

In 1971, INS vikrant bombed chittagong harbour to smithereens, enforced complete naval blockade of east pakistan, and sunk every naval and merchant ship there. The terrified pakistan navy officers tried to escape in camoflagued merchant vessels, which were also sunk by the fury of our carrier.

Learn some history before making a fool of yourself.

 
. . .
and then what?? Submarine sunk killing all crews??
That was 65. In 71, the vik blockaded half their country, and even sunk poor naval officers desperately trying to get away in merchant vessels. The east pakistan navy ceased to exist.

They dont teach that part of history to their schoolchildren, as the fellow you are replying to shows. Poor deluded souls.
 
.
That was 1965. Your submarine sunk, hunting for it.

In 1971, INS vikrant bombed chittagong harbour to smithereens, enforced complete naval blockade of east pakistan, and sunk every naval and merchant ship there. The terrified pakistan navy officers tried to escape in camoflagued merchant vessels, which were also sunk by the fury of our carrier.

Learn some history before making a fool of yourself.

you need to learn some history, that submarine didn't sunk in 1965 ...

in 1971 it was again somewhere deep inside india ...

This is a different times now, no chances of this ship to do anything good as we can take this out without using much force... just one or 2 Missiles and its over
 
.
and then what?? Submarine sunk killing all crews??

Are bhai, who are you explaining this to?? US, Russia, China all have missiles and Aircraft carriers....what about pakistan??:lol:
 
.
That was 65. In 71, the vik blockaded half their country, and even sunk poor naval officers desperately trying to get away in merchant vessels. The east pakistan navy ceased to exist.

They dont teach that part of history to their schoolchildren, as the fellow you are replying to shows. Poor deluded souls.

pls don't reply to the troll

answer my post on aesa radar 
you need to learn some history, that submarine didn't sunk in 1965 ...

in 1971 it was again somewhere deep inside india ...

This is a different times now, no chances of this ship to do anything good as we can take this out without using much force... just one or 2 Missiles and its over

@Aeronaut

pls stop this person fro derailing this thread
 
.
you need to learn some history, that submarine didn't sunk in 1965 ...

in 1971 it was again somewhere deep inside india ...

This is a different times now, no chances of this ship to do anything good as we can take this out without using much force... just one or 2 Missiles and its over

Well, you could have done so in 71 as well. Missiles existed back then, as we showed by starting bonfires in Karachi using styx missiles.

Anyway, read up on what our carrier did to your navy then, and imagine what we can do now, with a much more potent carrier, and your navy lacking even a destroyer. Heck, the displacement of the INS vik without its carrier battle groups, is almost the same as the entire PN. LOL.

As if we dont know that missiles exist, and we dont have countermeasures. As if shipbuilders around the world didnt know that, unlike enlightened keyboard warriors.
 
.
pls don't reply to the troll

answer my post on aesa radar 


@Aeronaut

pls stop this person fro derailing this thread
All my Posts are related to the subject.. its you who started trolling and making it a pak-india war thread ....
 
.
All my Posts are related to the subject.. its you who started trolling and making it a pak-india war thread ....
No, it was you who started it by saying that one missile will bring it down, as if our navy has never heard of missiles.

Save yourselff some embarassment andd leave. Or continue getting embarassed, your choice.

I am reminded about the story of the fox and the grapes. The fox who realized that he can never gets the grapes, consoles himself that the grapes are not worth it. Pakistanis who can only drool at things like aircraft carriers, and know that their country will never operate such things in their lifetime, delude themselves that one missile is all it takes.

Although they can never answer why not a single carrier has yyet been brought down in that fashion, why they didnt do so in 197 when half their country was blockaded and their naval officers were trying to sneak away in merchant ships at night from the fury of our flagship.
 
.
:sniper::sniper:One Missile from Pakistan will take down the game changer :) :pakistan::rofl::rofl::rofl::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

Ah there again, the PNS Moron commanded by @Leviza surfaces yet again in this thread. Must be PN's newest Submarine? PN's Game Changer; perhaps?

Who can explain to perpetually intelligence -challenged guys that one (or even two) missiles cannot sink a Carrier. @Oscar spent quite a bit of energy on another thread, trying to explain why.

But PNS Moron has to sail around still..........
 
.
No, it was you who started it by saying that one missile will bring it down, as if our navy has never heard of missiles.

Save yourselff some embarassment andd leave. Or continue getting embarassed, your choice.

I am reminded about the story of the fox and the grapes. The fox who realized that he can never gets the grapes, consoles himself that the grapes are not worth it. Pakistanis who can only drool at things like aircraft carriers, and know that their country will never operate such things in their lifetime, delude themselves that one missile is all it takes.

Although they can never answer why not a single carrier has yyet been brought down in that fashion, why they didnt do so in 197 when half their country was blockaded and their naval officers were trying to sneak away in merchant ships at night from the fury of our flagship.

Thats what you think but its far from reality... your carrier was deep hidden inside with a fear factor :)

today things are different , we have missiles which can take the the whole thing down... so you cant call it the Game changer in any way... its just another ship which can be hit easily..

Stop saying things which never happened but might be put into your little brain by indian army and you do not have any idea about todays age...
 
.
Thats what you think but its far from reality... your carrier was deep hidden inside with a fear factor :)

today things are different , we have missiles which can take the the whole thing down... so you cant call it the Game changer in any way... its just another ship which can be hit easily..

Stop saying things which never happened but might be put into your little brain by indian army and you do not have any idea about todays age...

No, our carrier was not hidden anywhere. It was bombing chittagong harbour and blockading east pakistan. The video footage is available in the youtube video I gave you; you can see east pakistan's commodore commanding's office in flames after sehwk strikes. Stop denying history dude; makes you look pathetic.

Denilistanis and their denial. LOL.

Ok, that never happened, chittagong was not bombed, east pakistan was not blockaded, the 1971 war didnt hppen, and east pakistn still exists. Whatever floats your boat. Or sinks it. LOL.

Some day you will have to learn the fact that they didnt teach you everything in school; that the mard e momins of pak were soundly defeated by India. That the naval officers shamefully tried to sneak away in merchant ships, but even that was thwarted. All this is recorded history that even pak navy cannot deny.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom