What's new

Indonesia Defence Forum

Wow impressive, this is the first time I know about sembada karya mandiri. We should integrate this products and LEN products at least on PC/Kal, Bakamla, or other older corvette models just to see how they perform then develop it further. Good info :enjoy:


Yea I think we already calculate whats going to happen and prepare some precautionay steps. Like I said earlier the placement of leopards and future Viper Ska is one of the security approached. One thing that we dont want is for TL to be unstable and creating headache to us. There are alot of uncertainty when one country become unstable, it can be used as proxy, insecurity around its shipping route (piracy), refugee, etc. So yea, we should monitor the development and act accordingly. In a mean time strengthening the border area with enough military power as prevention if worst scenario happen.
Well that's why i post them here. Public barely notices the existence of our private sectors and i know this forum is read by tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands and even millions online readers. Everything we say, discuss and even post sometimes are made into Fb page articles and Fb groups, here's perfect media to cover things unknown before.
Screenshot_2019-08-12-11-41-08-1.png
Screenshot_2019-08-12-11-41-15-1.png
Screenshot_2019-08-12-11-41-21-1.png
Screenshot_2019-08-12-11-41-27-1.png
Screenshot_2019-08-12-11-41-33-1.png

Credit to Komite Kebijakan Industri Pertahanan
 
Indonesia anger as West Papua independence raised at Pacific forum
Mon 12 Aug 2019 00.54 BST

Human rights violations and political independence in West Papua are set to command debate at this week’s Pacific Islands Forum (PIF), where Papuan independence leader Benny Wenda will urge government leaders to support the “Free Papua” campaign amid recent escalating political violence.

Exiled from Papua, but now an official representative attached to the Vanuatu government’s delegation, Wenda is campaigning for a United Nations general assembly resolution next year that will re-examine the controversial 1969 Act of Free Choice vote that formalised Indonesian control of the province.

Wenda told the Guardian the human rights abuses and civil repressions that currently blight the province are a “cancer inside the heart of the people of the Pacific”, but that major powers in the region choose to ignore it for geo-strategic and economic regions.

Indonesia – not a member of the Pacific Islands Forum, but a “dialogue partner” attending this week’s forum – regards West Papua as an integral and indivisible part of the Indonesian state.

Indonesian-controlled Papua and West Papua form the western half of the island of New Guinea. Political control of the region has been contested for more than half a century and Indonesia has consistently been accused of human rights violations and violent suppression of the region’s independence movement.

West Papuan sources say violence in the region is worsening, protesters have been beaten and jailed, and there have been claims white phosphorous, a banned chemical weapon, has been used to attack civilians. This claim has been strenuously denied by Indonesia.

A spokesman for the Indonesian government said Jakarta was “not at all happy” West Papua had been included on the formal agenda for the forum leaders’ meeting in Tuvalu, and warned the move would establish a precedent for interference in other countries’ domestic affairs.

“Developments in Papua and West Papua province are purely Indonesia’s internal affairs. No other country, organisation or individual has the right to interfere in them. We firmly oppose the intervention of Indonesia’s internal affairs in whatever form.”

The West Papuan delegation was expected to arrive for the forum at the weekend, but were unable to board flights to Tuvalu from Fiji. On Sunday, Enele Sopoaga the prime minister of Tuvalu, and Dame Meg Taylor, secretary general of the PIF, said they had no idea what had happened. It appears the problem was an administrative one on the part of the Vanuatu government, with whom the west Papuan delegation were meant to be travelling.

At a meeting of the region’s foreign ministers last month, Vanuatu successfully pushed to have the issue of West Papua formally included on the Pacific Islands Forum agenda, over the vociferous objections of Australia.

Wenda said while the Pacific’s regional powers, Australia and New Zealand, are vocal critics of rights abuses around the world “they never talk about West Papua”.

“We are human beings who want to live in peace, but we are discriminated against because others want to depopulate our place and take our resources.

“Australia has a big responsibility in the region. Australia needs to look at this as their own issue, as a regional issue, because it will never go away in the eyes of the people. This issue is like cancer inside the heart of the people of the Pacific.”

Wenda said the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) he leads ultimately seeks a free and fair vote on secession from Indonesia. “We have never exercised our right to self-determination, that has been denied us. We are not seeking violence, we seek our rights peacefully, to decide for ourselves our future. Let us vote,” Wenda said.

Last year’s Pacific Islands Forum communique stated: “Leaders recognised the constructive engagement by Forum countries with Indonesia with respect to elections and human rights in West Papua.”

Wenda is seeking a similar, if not stronger, united commitment from the Pacific bloc this year, ahead of a campaign to have the UN pass a resolution next year mandating the re-examination of the UN-supervised Act of Free Choice.

Along with climate change, the issue of West Papua is likely to set Australia in opposition to its Pacific island neighbours at this week’s forum.

Australia is strongly supportive of Indonesian sovereignty over Papua, while the independence movement has widespread support among Pacific island nations - particularly Melanesian neighbours Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands - where it is seen as a continuation of the decades-long decolonisation movement across the region.

A spokesman for Australia’s foreign affairs department said: “Australia recognises Indonesia’s sovereignty over the Papua provinces, as stated in the Lombok Treaty of 2006. Australia will not support efforts that undermine Indonesian sovereignty over Papua in any forum and will not associate itself with any PIF communique to that effect.”

The spokesman said Australia regularly raised human rights concerns with Indonesian authorities, including regarding the Papua provinces.

The Indonesian government spokesman said discussion of West Papua at the forum this week would create a “negative precedent to openly discuss the domestic affairs of other countries… we believe no countries will accept that”.

The spokesman said Papua had self-governance rights through its special autonomy status and democratically elected leaders that participated in Indonesian political system. “In the 2019 elections, the turn out in the province of Papua and West Papua was 88% … 94% of the vote was in favour of president Jokowi’s administration. This high turn-out reflects the strong recognition of the Papuan people’s political aspiration and their faith towards the democratic process in Indonesia.”

The people indigenous to West Papua are Melanesian, ethnically distinct from most of the rest of Indonesia and more closely linked to the people of Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Fiji and New Caledonia.

Formerly the Netherlands New Guinea, Papua was retained by the Dutch after Indonesian independence in 1945 but the province was annexed by Jakarta in 1963.

Indonesia formalised its control over West Papua in 1969 when its military hand-picked 1,025 of West Papua’s population and coerced them into voting in favour of Indonesian annexation under a UN-supervised, but undemocratic, process known as the Act of Free Choice.

Known as Irian Jaya until 2000, it was split into two provinces, Papua and West Papua, in 2003. Those provinces have semi-autonomous status.

In May this year, the then UK government minister for Asia and the Pacific, Mark Field, described the Act of Free Choice as an “utterly flawed process”, but said there was no international appetite to revisit the question of the legitimacy of Indonesia’s control.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...independence-raises-its-head-at-pacific-forum

---

pffffttt.. :crazy::cheesy:

.

.
 
Indonesia anger as West Papua independence raised at Pacific forum
Mon 12 Aug 2019 00.54 BST

Human rights violations and political independence in West Papua are set to command debate at this week’s Pacific Islands Forum (PIF), where Papuan independence leader Benny Wenda will urge government leaders to support the “Free Papua” campaign amid recent escalating political violence.

Exiled from Papua, but now an official representative attached to the Vanuatu government’s delegation, Wenda is campaigning for a United Nations general assembly resolution next year that will re-examine the controversial 1969 Act of Free Choice vote that formalised Indonesian control of the province.

Wenda told the Guardian the human rights abuses and civil repressions that currently blight the province are a “cancer inside the heart of the people of the Pacific”, but that major powers in the region choose to ignore it for geo-strategic and economic regions.

Indonesia – not a member of the Pacific Islands Forum, but a “dialogue partner” attending this week’s forum – regards West Papua as an integral and indivisible part of the Indonesian state.

Indonesian-controlled Papua and West Papua form the western half of the island of New Guinea. Political control of the region has been contested for more than half a century and Indonesia has consistently been accused of human rights violations and violent suppression of the region’s independence movement.

West Papuan sources say violence in the region is worsening, protesters have been beaten and jailed, and there have been claims white phosphorous, a banned chemical weapon, has been used to attack civilians. This claim has been strenuously denied by Indonesia.

A spokesman for the Indonesian government said Jakarta was “not at all happy” West Papua had been included on the formal agenda for the forum leaders’ meeting in Tuvalu, and warned the move would establish a precedent for interference in other countries’ domestic affairs.

“Developments in Papua and West Papua province are purely Indonesia’s internal affairs. No other country, organisation or individual has the right to interfere in them. We firmly oppose the intervention of Indonesia’s internal affairs in whatever form.”

The West Papuan delegation was expected to arrive for the forum at the weekend, but were unable to board flights to Tuvalu from Fiji. On Sunday, Enele Sopoaga the prime minister of Tuvalu, and Dame Meg Taylor, secretary general of the PIF, said they had no idea what had happened. It appears the problem was an administrative one on the part of the Vanuatu government, with whom the west Papuan delegation were meant to be travelling.

At a meeting of the region’s foreign ministers last month, Vanuatu successfully pushed to have the issue of West Papua formally included on the Pacific Islands Forum agenda, over the vociferous objections of Australia.

Wenda said while the Pacific’s regional powers, Australia and New Zealand, are vocal critics of rights abuses around the world “they never talk about West Papua”.

“We are human beings who want to live in peace, but we are discriminated against because others want to depopulate our place and take our resources.

“Australia has a big responsibility in the region. Australia needs to look at this as their own issue, as a regional issue, because it will never go away in the eyes of the people. This issue is like cancer inside the heart of the people of the Pacific.”

Wenda said the United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) he leads ultimately seeks a free and fair vote on secession from Indonesia. “We have never exercised our right to self-determination, that has been denied us. We are not seeking violence, we seek our rights peacefully, to decide for ourselves our future. Let us vote,” Wenda said.

Last year’s Pacific Islands Forum communique stated: “Leaders recognised the constructive engagement by Forum countries with Indonesia with respect to elections and human rights in West Papua.”

Wenda is seeking a similar, if not stronger, united commitment from the Pacific bloc this year, ahead of a campaign to have the UN pass a resolution next year mandating the re-examination of the UN-supervised Act of Free Choice.

Along with climate change, the issue of West Papua is likely to set Australia in opposition to its Pacific island neighbours at this week’s forum.

Australia is strongly supportive of Indonesian sovereignty over Papua, while the independence movement has widespread support among Pacific island nations - particularly Melanesian neighbours Vanuatu and the Solomon Islands - where it is seen as a continuation of the decades-long decolonisation movement across the region.

A spokesman for Australia’s foreign affairs department said: “Australia recognises Indonesia’s sovereignty over the Papua provinces, as stated in the Lombok Treaty of 2006. Australia will not support efforts that undermine Indonesian sovereignty over Papua in any forum and will not associate itself with any PIF communique to that effect.”

The spokesman said Australia regularly raised human rights concerns with Indonesian authorities, including regarding the Papua provinces.

The Indonesian government spokesman said discussion of West Papua at the forum this week would create a “negative precedent to openly discuss the domestic affairs of other countries… we believe no countries will accept that”.

The spokesman said Papua had self-governance rights through its special autonomy status and democratically elected leaders that participated in Indonesian political system. “In the 2019 elections, the turn out in the province of Papua and West Papua was 88% … 94% of the vote was in favour of president Jokowi’s administration. This high turn-out reflects the strong recognition of the Papuan people’s political aspiration and their faith towards the democratic process in Indonesia.”

The people indigenous to West Papua are Melanesian, ethnically distinct from most of the rest of Indonesia and more closely linked to the people of Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Fiji and New Caledonia.

Formerly the Netherlands New Guinea, Papua was retained by the Dutch after Indonesian independence in 1945 but the province was annexed by Jakarta in 1963.

Indonesia formalised its control over West Papua in 1969 when its military hand-picked 1,025 of West Papua’s population and coerced them into voting in favour of Indonesian annexation under a UN-supervised, but undemocratic, process known as the Act of Free Choice.

Known as Irian Jaya until 2000, it was split into two provinces, Papua and West Papua, in 2003. Those provinces have semi-autonomous status.

In May this year, the then UK government minister for Asia and the Pacific, Mark Field, described the Act of Free Choice as an “utterly flawed process”, but said there was no international appetite to revisit the question of the legitimacy of Indonesia’s control.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...independence-raises-its-head-at-pacific-forum

---

pffffttt.. :crazy::cheesy:

.

.
Well let me guess, must be Vanuatu & Solomon pressing their agendas in the forum. Idk what they after from us however we need start lobbying valuable partners in the region such as Fiji and Papua New Guinea. Regardless no major power would go along and suit with their voice, so far Canberra and Wellington suits to follow Lombok Treaty 2006 and with growing threat from China, they need friendly strong buffer state, Indonesia as for London, they are in big trouble. Whoever seats in Downing Street no 10 basically just " mess " continuation from " gambling " David Cameron made 3 years ago. Theresa May or Borris Johnson now has more important focus next to their door steps; Brexit. Borris deliver promises Hard Brexit by October by which Nicola Sturgeon, Scottish 1st Minister ot Scotland pressing referendum to disintegrate Scotland from UK moreover the same movement grows in Belfast. UK is in no mood to discuss West Papua now
 
Well let me guess, must be Vanuatu & Solomon pressing their agendas in the forum. Idk what they after from us however we need start lobbying valuable partners in the region such as Fiji and Papua New Guinea. Regardless no major power would go along and suit with their voice, so far Canberra and Wellington suits to follow Lombok Treaty 2006 and with growing threat from China, they need friendly strong buffer state, Indonesia as for London, they are in big trouble. Whoever seats in Downing Street no 10 basically just " mess " continuation from " gambling " David Cameron made 3 years ago. Theresa May or Borris Johnson now has more important focus next to their door steps; Brexit. Borris deliver promises Hard Brexit by October by which Nicola Sturgeon, Scottish 1st Minister ot Scotland pressing referendum to disintegrate Scotland from UK moreover the same movement grows in Belfast. UK is in no mood to discuss West Papua now

or just keep the infrastructure development process and soon their complaint would be pretty much un-heard , or maybe those oceania country are in fear of sea level rising , so they need to lobby some of that west papuan rebel for their people to move if thing go worse :cheesy: .
 
They have military cumpolsury service for their citizens, they have the genuine " militant " citizens and yes i think we can study their concept of NDP and implement them here

Wah likely we are stepping forward in electronic warfare tech

Btw not the NDP but we must use new doctrine with new concept and strategy

Refining new Konsep Ketahan Nasional that must updated to answer latest treat

I think wamil not necessery, hmmm maybe just basic training in 3 month (or less) like basic markmanship, penataran mental ideologi pancasila, basic survival also PBB (ah i didnt like baris berbaris because when command "jalan di tempat" for me somewhat difficult)

(Tambahan : kita ada bela negara tapi rada ga jelas itu program arahnya mau kemana dan bakalan bagaiman jadi apa)

Maybe military basic training program is good for man age 18-25 and make it requirment for who want join AKMIL,AKPOL,bintara tamtama and other Ikatan Kedinasan hehehehe

So maybe it can filter "3% radical"

Cmiiw
 
No i mean for the next batch. If im not mistaken 18 boats in total. So we're talking about batch 5 or 6
I dont think it will be installed even in future batch of KCR 60. Prolly it still cant compete with current CMS, radar, Optical , etc, we are using. Thats why I think it should be good if we integrate them all (both LEN & SKM products) to perhaps couple of KCR 40, KAL, PC or perhaps Bakamla ships to give it a shot and help the industry while doing it. This will guarantee the further development of the system for both software & hardware. KCR 60 seems too important to be a test bed for it, at least thats the way I think our AL sees it.

or just keep the infrastructure development process
Agree, tho its expensive but its still great tools for them right now. Not to mention helping our brothers there to come out of their isolation due to lack of infrastructures.
 
Ehem,

Kayaknya tadi dari AURI coba ngasih teka-teki silang kepadaku, di depan hidungku tadi pagi mereka ngasih angka 1687 dan siang ini mereka lewat di depan mataku sambil mencoba membunyikan sesuatu agar angka 1687 itu jadi perhatianku.

So let's begin with numbers :

I've said a view days ago that we need interceptors to watch our three sea lanes.

87 / 3 = 29

It means every sealane (ALKI) will be protected by 29 unit of interceptors. There are three sealanes, thus 29 x 3 = 87 unit of interceptors.

Let's check to other perspective :

Our F16 fighters are usually assigned to intercept black flight.

F16 has combat radius 550 km.
If they are equipped with CFT, the combat radius will arise 40% or to be 1,4 times.

550 x 1,4 = 770

Thus the combat radius will be 770 km.

If they are equipped with AMRAAM C latest edition, this AMRAAM will have estimate range 150 km.

770 + 150 = 920

Thus the combat radius will be 920 km.

920 x 920 x 3,14 = 2.657.696 km2.

Our teritorry plus EEZ = 8.237.792 km2

8.237.792 / 2.657.696 = 3,0995990512

Large squadron is 28 unit

28 x 3,0995990512 = 86,78877 rounded to 87 unit.

Let's check to another perspective :

In Suharto's era we got 12 unit block 15 OCU.

2 unit written-off due to accidents.

12 - 2 = 10

Our block 52ID is 24 unit

10 + 24 = 34

Together with these 24 unit, we also got 4 unit block 25 plus 2 unit block 15.

34 + 4 + 2 = 40

1 to be written-off due to total loss in fire.

40 - 1 = 39

1 unit of block 15 OCU was slipped away but can be repaired.

Thus our F16 still 39 unit.

We are planning to have more 48 unit of F16 / Vipers.

39 + 48 = 87

After digging in three perspectives, we are led into one conclusion.

Conclusion : we will have 87 unit of F16s.

Jadi angka 1687 itu maksudnya 87 unit F16 yang bakal dimiliki oleh angkatan udara kita.
 
Ehem,

Kayaknya tadi dari AURI coba ngasih teka-teki silang kepadaku, di depan hidungku tadi pagi mereka ngasih angka 1687 dan siang ini mereka lewat di depan mataku sambil mencoba membunyikan sesuatu agar angka 1687 itu jadi perhatianku.

So let's begin with numbers :

I've said a view days ago that we need interceptors to watch our three sea lanes.

87 / 3 = 29

It means every sealane (ALKI) will be protected by 29 unit of interceptors. There are three sealanes, thus 29 x 3 = 87 unit of interceptors.

Let's check to other perspective :

Our F16 fighters are usually assigned to intercept black flight.

F16 has combat radius 550 km.
If they are equipped with CFT, the combat radius will arise 40% or to be 1,4 times.

550 x 1,4 = 770

Thus the combat radius will be 770 km.

If they are equipped with AMRAAM C latest edition, this AMRAAM will have estimate range 150 km.

770 + 150 = 920

Thus the combat radius will be 920 km.

920 x 920 x 3,14 = 2.657.696 km2.

Our teritorry plus EEZ = 8.237.792 km2

8.237.792 / 2.657.696 = 3,0995990512

Large squadron is 28 unit

28 x 3,0995990512 = 86,78877 rounded to 87 unit.

Let's check to another perspective :

In Suharto's era we got 12 unit block 15 OCU.

2 unit written-off due to accidents.

12 - 2 = 10

Our block 52ID is 24 unit

10 + 24 = 34

Together with these 24 unit, we also got 4 unit block 25 plus 2 unit block 15.

34 + 4 + 2 = 40

1 to be written-off due to total loss in fire.

40 - 1 = 39

1 unit of block 15 OCU was slipped away but can be repaired.

Thus our F16 still 39 unit.

We are planning to have more 48 unit of F16 / Vipers.

39 + 48 = 87

After digging in three perspectives, we are led into one conclusion.

Conclusion : we will have 87 unit of F16s.

Jadi angka 1687 itu maksudnya 87 unit F16 yang bakal dimiliki oleh angkatan udara kita.
So we have cocoklogy too here. Enlight me, where is that 'large squadron' term comes from? Any official or at least hoax about it?
 
So we have cocoklogy too here. Enlight me, where is that 'large squadron' term comes from? Any official or at least hoax about it?

Small squadron 12 - 14 unit
Standard squadron 16 - 18 unit
Big squadron 24 unit
Large squadron 28 - 32 unit

Aussy and Sweden use big squadrons
Our army will use large squadron of 32 unit helicopters.

http://defense-studies.blogspot.com/2018/07/indonesia-perlu-skuadron-besar-heli.html?m=1

Our air force usually have small squadron of 12-14 unit and standard squadron of 16 unit.

Large squadron to be implemented for disperse base squadron.

8 on duty/patrol
8 on alert
8 in maintenance
4 as back-up.

8 + 8 + 8 + 4 = 28
 
or just keep the infrastructure development process and soon their complaint would be pretty much un-heard , or maybe those oceania country are in fear of sea level rising , so they need to lobby some of that west papuan rebel for their people to move if thing go worse :cheesy: .
Well OPM is loosing the momentum when Government decides to up standard living in West Papua ( infrastructures, energy, health, education, etc ) but anyhow we must reduce the military presence someday when this insurgency things are over, it draws too much political attention in international world.

No i mean for the next batch. If im not mistaken 18 boats in total. So we're talking about batch 5 or 6
Do 18 boats include KCR-40 or just for KCR-60 ?

Wah likely we are stepping forward in electronic warfare tech

Btw not the NDP but we must use new doctrine with new concept and strategy

Refining new Konsep Ketahan Nasional that must updated to answer latest treat

I think wamil not necessery, hmmm maybe just basic training in 3 month (or less) like basic markmanship, penataran mental ideologi pancasila, basic survival also PBB (ah i didnt like baris berbaris because when command "jalan di tempat" for me somewhat difficult)

(Tambahan : kita ada bela negara tapi rada ga jelas itu program arahnya mau kemana dan bakalan bagaiman jadi apa)

Maybe military basic training program is good for man age 18-25 and make it requirment for who want join AKMIL,AKPOL,bintara tamtama and other Ikatan Kedinasan hehehehe

So maybe it can filter "3% radical"

Cmiiw
I understand what you're thinking. It's been long time i'm thinking Singapore or Australia is decent role model to develop our military

Ehem,

Kayaknya tadi dari AURI coba ngasih teka-teki silang kepadaku, di depan hidungku tadi pagi mereka ngasih angka 1687 dan siang ini mereka lewat di depan mataku sambil mencoba membunyikan sesuatu agar angka 1687 itu jadi perhatianku.

So let's begin with numbers :

I've said a view days ago that we need interceptors to watch our three sea lanes.

87 / 3 = 29

It means every sealane (ALKI) will be protected by 29 unit of interceptors. There are three sealanes, thus 29 x 3 = 87 unit of interceptors.

Let's check to other perspective :

Our F16 fighters are usually assigned to intercept black flight.

F16 has combat radius 550 km.
If they are equipped with CFT, the combat radius will arise 40% or to be 1,4 times.

550 x 1,4 = 770

Thus the combat radius will be 770 km.

If they are equipped with AMRAAM C latest edition, this AMRAAM will have estimate range 150 km.

770 + 150 = 920

Thus the combat radius will be 920 km.

920 x 920 x 3,14 = 2.657.696 km2.

Our teritorry plus EEZ = 8.237.792 km2

8.237.792 / 2.657.696 = 3,0995990512

Large squadron is 28 unit

28 x 3,0995990512 = 86,78877 rounded to 87 unit.

Let's check to another perspective :

In Suharto's era we got 12 unit block 15 OCU.

2 unit written-off due to accidents.

12 - 2 = 10

Our block 52ID is 24 unit

10 + 24 = 34

Together with these 24 unit, we also got 4 unit block 25 plus 2 unit block 15.

34 + 4 + 2 = 40

1 to be written-off due to total loss in fire.

40 - 1 = 39

1 unit of block 15 OCU was slipped away but can be repaired.

Thus our F16 still 39 unit.

We are planning to have more 48 unit of F16 / Vipers.

39 + 48 = 87

After digging in three perspectives, we are led into one conclusion.

Conclusion : we will have 87 unit of F16s.

Jadi angka 1687 itu maksudnya 87 unit F16 yang bakal dimiliki oleh angkatan udara kita.
Where do you even get this 1687 from ? Are you reading what @ayamjago said in indo××××××× ? Well that man making hillarious comments. I remember 3 or 4 years ago he made all predictions on ridiculously " Kilo sub hull with NATO subsystems " and many more which proven to be nothing
 
Need at least 14 years to developed and reverse engineering Grad type 122 mm MLRS, at least they got it with minimum budget and least priority. 30 km range is very acceptable compared to other products in which only ranged between dozen kilos to twenty something.



------------
WhatsApp_Image_2019-07-23_at_12.43_.35_1.jpeg

Setelah melewati serangkaian proses sertifikasi, PT Pindad (Persero) akhirnya telah berhasil mengantongi seritifikat tipe senjata udara militer Roket RHan - 122B Kategori Senjata Udara Artillery Ground to Ground Rocket dengan nomor: IMMA TC AW/ROKET 001-2019.

Sertifikat tipe diberikan oleh Kapuslaik Laksma TNI Teguh Sugiono dan diterima secara langsung oleh Direktur Teknik dan Pengembangan Ade Bagdja di Kantor Kementerian Pertahanan RI, Jakarta, Selasa (24/7/2019).

Kapuslaik TNI Teguh Sugiono dalam sambutannya mengatakan semoga proses sertifikasi yang telah dikerjakan dapat sesuai harapan dan dapat menjadi acuan dalam pengembangannya jika ada.

"Harapannya untuk apa yang sudah dikerjakan dapat sesuai harapan dari konsorsium yang ada," ujarnya.

Teguh mengharapkan program RHan 122 B ini harus terus berkembang. Sementara itu, dikatakan Ade Bagdja program ini harus dan akan tetap berkembang. "Pindad berkomitmen program ini masih perlu kami kembangkan, kita akan upayakan." Ujarnya. Menurut Ade Bagdja, adapun beberapa yang belum sempurna akan dilakukan peningkatan produk konsorsium.

RHan 122B ini merupakan salahsatu program yang berhasil diselesaikan PT Pindad bersama anggota konsorsium lainnya yaitu PT Dirgantara Indonesia, PT Dahana dan Lapan. Program yang telah dimulai sejak 2005 ini adalah wujud dari komitmen PT Pindad untuk melakukan penguasaan teknologi dan pengembangan industri pertahanan nasional.

Adapun Spesifikasi RHan122B, sebagai berikut;

Rocket Type : Ballistic, Ground to Ground

Launcher Type : Compatible with GRAD 122mm, Launching from MLRS RM-70 GRAD

Fin Type : Wrapped Around Folded Aerial Fin

Proppelant type : Composite Propellant

Caliber : 122mm

Propellant length : 2000mm

Propellant Star : 400mm

Propellant Hollow : 1,600 mm

Motor Tube Length : 2,903 mm

Rocket length : 2,810 mm

Propellant Weight : 24,6 kg

Motor Rocket Weight : 45.8 ± 0.20 kg

Rocket Weight : 60.8 ± 0.20 kg

Average Thrust : 1,437 kg

Burning Time : 3.3 sec

Total Impulse : 4,809 kgf.sec

Warhead : 15kg

Range : 30.5 km

Nozzle Type : Single

https://pindad.com/pindad-kantongi-sertifikat-tipe-senjata-udara-militer-rhan-122-b
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom