What's new

India's UNSC Dream

Keep dreaming buddy even if you get the seat it will hold no veto which is useless.

The whole point in the exercise is liquidating the power of the veto or of the members so that only a few retards don't hold the power over the overall masses of the world.
 
BTW do you know what happened to those who in J&K who voiced support for Pakistan.Believe me it was quite messy.
I hope your location is not in India or your 'talking' is confined to internet forums only.:whistle:

Krait your compatriot here is gloating about the murder of civilians and you are crying for the mods on one side while thanking this scum on the other.
 
India ki demand hi flawed hai. UNSC exists because 191 nation states allow it to exist. They can play veto veto all they want, but if UNGA votes UNSC nullified, no veto would amount to anything.

If anything India should have not been greedy but pushed for abolishing the UNSC. Why should one nation have more of a vote than the other? Why should one have the right to cancel the other? If there are 191 nations, get the majority vote and move on.
 
India ki demand hi flawed hai. UNSC exists because 191 nation states allow it to exist. They can play veto veto all they want, but if UNGA votes UNSC nullified, no veto would amount to anything.

If anything India should have not been greedy but pushed for abolishing the UNSC. Why should one nation have more of a vote than the other? Why should one have the right to cancel the other? If there are 191 nations, get the majority vote and move on.
You want to say the the value of vote by US will the same as that of by Togo or Mali!:rolleyes:
 
The whole point in the exercise is liquidating the power of the veto or of the members so that only a few retards don't hold the power over the overall masses of the world.

Than you have 0 percent chance in success because the veto holding powers will never give it up and it will only take 1 to strike it down. In a perfect world maybe but this is not a perfect world, the Zionists would be the first to protest such a process because if it went through the next time a vote for Palestine went up it would pass which is a nightmare scenario for them.
 
India ki demand hi flawed hai. UNSC exists because 191 nation states allow it to exist. They can play veto veto all they want, but if UNGA votes UNSC nullified, no veto would amount to anything.

If anything India should have not been greedy but pushed for abolishing the UNSC. Why should one nation have more of a vote than the other? Why should one have the right to cancel the other? If there are 191 nations, get the majority vote and move on.

That's what's India's set out to do. There is no urgent need for veto - but then our fate should not rest in the hands of a bunch of jokers.
 
Than you have 0 percent chance in success because the veto holding powers will never give it up and it will only take 1 to strike it down. In a perfect world maybe but this is not a perfect world, the Zionists would be the first to protest such a process because if it went through the next time a vote for Palestine went up it would pass which is a nightmare scenario for them.

It's about the camel and the tent story - India does not want it solo - it wants a bunch of countries to be nominated along with it, spreading the overall power over a wider area.
 
@ Ajtr : You didn't answer me ! :cry:

@ Krait : Oye...baaaz aajaa ! Meri behan ko troll na kar. :angry:
Who cares. If I say your soldiers slave or clap at all TTP killings, what will be your reaction . So I don't care. Problem is she is trolling in entire thread and Asim just ignored all her posts.
 
nuke deal was quid pro quo for nuke test moratorium on nuke tests.BTW unless you test further your tnt that fizzled in 1998 is of no use.

We don't need further tests. Nuclear deal already have shown that world has accepted India as a responsible nuclear power.
 
India ki demand hi flawed hai. UNSC exists because 191 nation states allow it to exist. They can play veto veto all they want, but if UNGA votes UNSC nullified, no veto would amount to anything.

If anything India should have not been greedy but pushed for abolishing the UNSC. Why should one nation have more of a vote than the other? Why should one have the right to cancel the other? If there are 191 nations, get the majority vote and move on.

Good luck, the US would just pull funding of the UN and bye bye UN hello uncontrolled anarchy. Unless Shining India wants to take up the majority funding for UN and set them up in New Delhi. :azn:
 
India ki demand hi flawed hai. UNSC exists because 191 nation states allow it to exist. They can play veto veto all they want, but if UNGA votes UNSC nullified, no veto would amount to anything.

If anything India should have not been greedy but pushed for abolishing the UNSC. Why should one nation have more of a vote than the other? Why should one have the right to cancel the other? If there are 191 nations, get the majority vote and move on.
UNSC is just prestige issue for india leadership thinking it to be one step towards their perceived superpower dream.But fence sitters like india can never get the unsc membership.
 
You want to say the the value of vote by US will the same as that of by Togo or Mali!:rolleyes:

In a democracy, the value of your vote is less than Tata family's? Obviously they have been accepted into the UNGA as a member, so has USA. In a voting platform, all votes are equal.

This concept is so flawed, that why does that nation have the same value as a big nation. Then why stop there? Go back to warlordism and beat the crap out of each other till you get to the top.
 
Back
Top Bottom