Source?
i found this in Google, i will post the link if i got that again..
Army SF PARA Commandos slither down from an IAF Mi-8 helicopter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Source?
These look like they are from quite some time ago (before 2008 at least).
I beg to differ on your point about "no forces in the world". You only need to look across the border and will find experts in HAW. We have been practicing the art of operating at High Altitude for as long as your side.Overall the Paras may be the most bad *** among Indian SFs,but when it comes to high altitude warfare,no forces in the world can come even close to the Parvat Ghataks.........not even the 9 Para.
I beg to differ on your point about "no forces in the world". You only need to look across the border and will find experts in HAW. We have been practicing the art of operating at High Altitude for as long as your side.
Pathetic that it needed an event like 26/11 to wake up policy makers to bring the NSG from the pics above ....
to this
Pathetic that it needed an event like 26/11 to wake up policy makers to bring the NSG from the pics above ....
to this
Yes I've seen this pic..
The helmets,webbings,pads n optics look nice .. Although gotta hate those weird russkie helmets.. Look bulky as hell..
Well, they surely had their reasons for this choice, although I think that it will be difficult to use other equipment like masks with them.The helmets,webbings,pads n optics look nice .. Although gotta hate those weird russkie helmets.. Look bulky as hell..
Yeah,the helmets are somewhat bulky indeed,may be these offer better ear protection or something.
But more than the helmets,I don't like those sub machine-guns.I'm not too big a fan of SMGs.......especially the ones chambered for 9X19mm Parabellum rounds.
Ideally they should've gone for a carbine or a bullpup assault rifle like the TAR 21 or the Styer AUG.
Yeah,the helmets are somewhat bulky indeed,may be these offer better ear protection or something.
But more than the helmets,I don't like those sub machine-guns.I'm not too big a fan of SMGs.......especially the ones chambered for 9X19mm Parabellum rounds.
Ideally they should've gone for a carbine or a bullpup assault rifle like the TAR 21 or the Styer AUG.
The era of m-16 has passed..Well, they surely had their reasons for this choice, although I think that it will be difficult to use other equipment like masks with them.
Members of the NSG bomb squad do have other less bulkier helmets though
They chose 9mm rounds because they are less likely to go through a target and harm other people (hostages) behind it
The NSG is a CT unit! Saving innocent lives has highest priority.
But they obviously got AR`s as well.
Sigs and M 16s for instance:
True, but the M 16 has only seen very limited service with the NSG. Their main AR is the Sig 550 seriesMp-5 is an ideal weapon for CQB.. It's compact,lighter and accurate ... As for ear protection common man.. Check my avatar these are GIDS produced helmets .. You can see they do cover the ears etc..
View attachment 39966
Regular army troops during ex.
The era of m-16 has passed..
True, but the M 16 has only seen very limited service with the NSG. Their main AR is the Sig 550 series
Should have bought another AR.. I have an M-16 n m-4... Our army has had them since the late 60s...Although the cauliflower effect n the sound is nice .. I'd still chose an AK or a M-4 over it ... And since NSG is more of a urban anti terrorist force .. I personally feel it was a bad purchase on their part.. Its a battle rifle homie .. Would have suited your army more than NSG.. My 2 RS..