What's new

Indian Political Corner | All Updates & Discussions.

Somewhere In my own :p:
India mein hi hoon bhai ... bus sirf andheri raaton mein hi bahar aaton hoon !!! :devil:

LOL, Something similar to my case. raat ke 4 baj rahe aur mai forum par AAP ki canvassing kar rahaa hoon:enjoy:. Job par lag jaunga toh waapas time table follow karna padega
 
No power in AAP's promise: Fund shock reveals there is no money for AAP's 'bijli satyagraha' subsidy
By MAIL TODAY REPORTER

PUBLISHED: 22:48 GMT, 18 March 2014 | UPDATED: 23:21 GMT, 18 March 2014


443 shares
1

View
comments


+2
Arvind Kejriwal had told Delhi residents not to pay their electricity bills if they thought the they were inflated. He went from door to door restoring the power connection of households whose lines had been cut. He has accused the channel of airing false news against him The competent authority of the government had not made any provision in the budget for release of funds for the purpose



It's the lie in the Aam Aadmi Party satyagraha, and it's been nailed in the Delhi High Court.

The Delhi government on Tuesday told the high court that the AAP government did not allocate any funds to finance the Rs 6 crore subsidy that it had announced for those who did not pay their electricity bills from October 2012 to May 2013.

The lack of funds means no one will benefit from the scheme. Don't pay your electricity bills, AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal had told Delhi's power consumers as he went about climbing electric poles and getting his pictures taken restoring power connections last year. Over 24,000 didn't, between October 2012 and December 2013. Then Kejriwal came to power.

In February this year, AAP had announced a reward for these power bill defaulters, declaring that those who did not pay their power bills between October 2012 and April 2013 will have to pay only half the amount.

This scheme was to benefit those who had supported the Aam Aadmi Party's Bijli Satyagraha, a campaign against allegedly inflated electricity bills.

The AAP decision was meant to benefit 24,036 people across the capital.

On Tuesday, the counsel for the state submitted an affidavit before a division bench of the high court comprising acting Chief Justice B.D. Ahmed and Justice Sidharth Mridul that former chief minister Arvind Kejriwal's decision to offer 50 per cent waiver on power arrears for people who did not pay their bills from October 2012 to December 2013 cannot be implemented due to non-allocation of funds for the same in the budget for 2013-14.

Taking into note the above submission, the High Court continued its stay on AAP's decision to give 50 per cent waiver on pending electricity bills of 24,036 consumers.

The Court has fixed the matter for final hearing on May 22 this year. Filing the affidavit on behalf of the Delhi government, Madhu Sudan, deputy secretary of power, told the court, "The competent authority of the government had not made any provision in the budget for release of funds for the purpose and in the absence of the availability of funds, therefore, in the present circumstances, it is not possible to implement the decision of the cabinet for providing relief to the electricity consumers who stopped paying their bills anytime between October 2012 and May 2013 till December 2013."


article-2583778-1C65763100000578-327_634x398.jpg


+2
Kejriwal and his supporters set water and electricity bills on fire and restored disconnected power connections at various places in the Capital as part of their "paani-bijli satyagraha" on Sunday



The bench was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by advocate Vivek Narayan Sharma, who also sought quashing the Delhi government's decision to close power theft cases registered against 2,508 consumers last year.

The plea said that such an action of the government was like "sponsoring and abetting criminal or terrorism acts and acts against rule of law and constitution."

Power tariff in Delhi was a prominent campaign issue for AAP in the run up to the Delhi Assembly elections with Kejriwal promising he would slash power tariffs by 50 per cent after being voted to power.

After coming to power, the AAP government has come down heavily on power discoms in Delhi, seeking a CAG audit of their accounts. As per the PIL in the Court, the waiver would have imposed a burden of Rs 6 crore on the state exchequer.



Read more: No funds allotted for AAP's big move to subsidise participants in bijli satyagraha | Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Modi didn't pick Varanasi because its a safe seat. It wouldn't have mattered if Congis had won it the last 10 times.

He picked Varanasi because it is the most important place of Hinduism. Even though he is talking only about development there is no doubt that he is sending a message to his core voters (Supporters of BJP). As an MP of Varanasi, his constituency is not just the residents of Varanasi but All the Hindus in India (at least that is what he will project).

Hence there is no better seat in whole India for him then Varanasi (as he moves out of Gujarat) as a national leader. From here he can control his core constituency and reach out to others (non BJP supporters including Muslims) without having to worry about any backlash.

He is not playing for only 2014 elections but is planning for a very long innings (10-15 years). And standing for election from Varanasi is a Master Stroke. Vadodara is the Safe Seat (backup - which he will quit after May 16).


P.S. I am not a TARD to follow anyone blindly. I keep my eyes open and try to analyze events with some logic. If you didn't donate your brains to Kejriwal you should firgure it out too.

So you do agree that Varanasi is a symbol of Hindus and with 80% Hindu population, Is it not a safe seat for Modi then?

And when replying please refrain from making personal attacks...
 
So you do agree that Varanasi is a symbol of Hindus and with 80% Hindu population, Is it not a safe seat for Modi then?


And when replying please refrain from making personal attacks...

Arey if that is the criteria then 90% seats in India is safe seat for Modi. So then why is this an issue? Are you expecting him to contest from Srinagar to prove that 'Modi wave' exists?
 
That's true! & for that to happen.. we need to eliminate those parties who hitch their wagon on the back of divisive politics. Congress has set the benchmark in this heinous act for others to follow. Be it playing communal card, or religion card, or caste card or tribe card, or dynastic politics. It all started from Congress... & if this party is uprooted & thrown into the dustbin of history.. things would improve to a greater extent in our country.
It's not going to happen atleast not in the near future, moreover every party plays the divisive politics. Even if someone tries to change the pattern he is unwillingly lured into this mess. Only way I say this happening is if people try to change it from the lower level ... that is muncipalities and panchayats.
 
Another problem is that Election Commision cannot exercise any of it's powers in foreign Nations. It cannot prevent any cash-for-votes or other subversive activities unless the local Police forces of these Nations are fully receptive to the process, which is highly unlikely. And what if any acts of violence take place outside the Embassies?:eek:
I can't imagine any sort malpractices or violent acts happening in overseas countries during voting. You can not buy NRI's vote... for simple reason being, price could be too high to handle.. & don't think a well-to-do NRI would trade his vote for cash. Law & order outside the embassy is always host country's responsibility.. & I don't think a foreign citizen would want to indulge in such a act which could prove detrimental to his stay in that country!
 
Arey if that is the criteria then 90% seats in India is safe seat for Modi. So then why is this an issue? Are you expecting him to contest from Srinagar to prove that 'Modi wave' exists?

Oh common mate, you yourself stated that Varanasi is a symbol of Hinduism with many religious people(Hindus) residing there and Modi being a Hindu poster boy, wouldn't he have major advantage over there? And as stated earlier BJP has dominated the seat since 90's...
 
I can't imagine any sort malpractices or violent acts happening in overseas countries during voting. You can not buy NRI's vote... for simple reason being, price could be too high to handle.. & don't think a well-to-do NRI would trade his vote for cash. Law & order outside the embassy is always host country's responsibility.. & I don't think a foreign citizen would want to indulge in such a act which could prove detrimental to his stay in that country!

You're right, but points like what I put forth will be given as excuses should anyone question the Indian Government on why NRIs cannot vote from outside India.

But let me make it clear that I am ready to cast my vote to the highest bidder.:laugh:
 
You're right, but points like what I put forth will be given as excuses should anyone question the Indian Government on why NRIs cannot vote from outside India.

But let me make it clear that I am ready to cast my vote to the highest bidder.:laugh:
politicians lure voters with money/liquor/women how would you prefer to be pleased? :lol:

Lagta hai police walon se bahot yaarana hai ;)
Naaaahhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii .. trust me
rkl_ranjeet2.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom