The last known Indian position is at where Galwan river meets Shyok rive at the new road. If India pulls back from there then India can't use the road & Chinese objective is reached. Pulling back 2 km from Indian current position in Galwan is not in favor of India but in favor of China. India cannot use the road after this pull back.
Let me break this down to you in simple English. Disengagement talks are needed when there is a situation like we have now. Both sides have military build-up on either side and are not backing down during these times there is no patrolling of troops, when there is, there are chances of a flare-up.
Now, the talks are not on a retrieving from a specific point. But to respect the LAC status quo. Now you can spin it in any way you want, once LAC is agreed upon India can continue with the construction which is still going on.
He thinks every one in the world is an idiot? Just look at the image in this tweet. he is moving back China from their position and then moving back India also from Chinese position wtf. India has to be at Chinese position to move back from there which India is not. India is at it camp & China is at it's camp so India has to move back from it camp & China has to move back from it's camp if there is any disengagement at Galwan. Dis engagement at galwan is not happening cause it has already happened. He lied about galwan.
haha only idiots here are jumping guns finding faults. In case OSINTs missed it.
Here are the latest developments in the India-China border face-off:
1. Both NSA Doval and minister Wang agreed that both sides should maintain peace and tranquillity in the border areas as it is essential for further development of bilateral relations between India and China, top government officials said. They also agreed that both sides should complete the ongoing disengagement process along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) expeditiously, the officials added.
2. During the discussions, both the Special Representatives on the boundary issue re-affirmed that India and China should strictly respect and observe the LAC and not take any unilateral action to alter the status quo, an external affairs ministry statement issued later said.
3. It was also agreed upon that the diplomatic and military officials of the two sides should continue their discussions, the statement said.
4. The disengagement came six days after commander-level talks took place (on June 30) to cool the situation in eastern Ladakh’s Galwan Valley area.
5. China on Monday said
“progress” had been made between the two militaries, and that the two sides will continue to work to implement the consensus reached at the two previous rounds of talks.
6. The Chinese troops agreed to move back in the Galwan Valley on Monday. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has possibly moved back by 1 to 1.5 km from the friction site, people familiar with developments said.
7. “Disengagement with the PLA has started as per agreed terms in the Corps Commander’s meeting. The PLA was seen removing tents and structures at Patrolling Point 14,” said a person aware of the developments.
8. The Chinese foreign ministry on July 1 had welcomed the June 30 military-level talks.
9. During the talks, th military commanders had agreed to work on an “expeditious, phased and step-wise de-escalation” of the ongoing border conflict “on priority”.
10. There have been several rounds of talks between top Chinese and Indian army commanders in the Ladakh region since 20 Indian soldiers and an unknown number of Chinese troops were killed on June 15 in their worst clash in 45 years.
