What's new

Indian deal on key Iranian port a potential check on China’s regional ambitions

Ocean

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
2,487
Reaction score
-1
Country
Argentina
Location
Pakistan
India has taken over a strategically important port in Iran, giving it a potential bulwark against China’s growing influence in the region and access to Afghanistan and Europe that bypasses Pakistan.

India signed the lease on Saturday for Chabahar port in eastern Iran about 90km west of the Pakistani port of Gwadar, which is being developed by China.

Gwadar is the centrepiece of a massive Chinese infrastructure programme in Pakistan and is expected to be the site of China’s second overseas military base, according to a US Department of Defence report last year.

India and Iran signed the 18-month agreement for the first phase of the Chabahar port building after talks between Iranian President Hassan Rowhani and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi.

Once completed, the port will open up a new sea-rail transport route between India, Iran and Afghanistan, bypassing rival and neighbour Pakistan.

Indian officials said they hoped the route would boost annual trade with Afghanistan from US$700 million to US$1 billion in three years.

dc985b6e-155d-11e8-ace5-29063da208e4_1320x770_195436.jpg


New Delhi sent shipments of wheat aid to Afghanistan through Chabahar last year.

The route will run roughly parallel with the US$62 billion China-Pakistan Economic Corridor that links Xinjiang in China to Gwadar, which China has leased for 40 years.

The announcement from New Delhi comes as ties between India and China have been strained by territorial disputes and India’s suspicions that China is encircling India through investment in its neighbours under the “Belt and Road Initiative”.

Zhao Gancheng, a South Asia specialist at the Shanghai Institute for International Studies, said the Iranian port was part of India’s backup plan, given the lack of trust between China and India.

“If China turns Gwadar into a military port, I believe India will by all means do everything it can in the region to contain China, including using Chabahar,” Zhao said

“But now that China is not doing anything in that direction, it is too early to judge what India will do.”

New Delhi-based political commentator Madhav Nalapat said India needed a port in Iran where it was “free to trade” because Pakistan refused to allow India access to the corridor or Gwadar.

India has stressed repeatedly that the corridor passes through areas contested by both New Delhi and Islamabad. It also sees China’s port-building activities in South Asia as an attempt to create “a string of pearls” to contain India’s regional power.

India and Iran have been in talks to develop Chabahar since 2003 but they were stalled by tensions between Iran and the United States.

London-based South Asia expert Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said the new agreement was in line with the White House’s regional strategy, which sees India playing a key role in Afghanistan’s stability and security.

“This deal has more to do with Pakistan-Afghanistan rather than China, but strategically, it helps counter China’s expanding influence in the Indian Ocean,” Roy-Chaudhury said.

Tridivesh Singh Maini, assistant professor with the Jindal School of International Affairs, said the real importance of the Indian trade route through Chabahar port was to “develop an alternative narrative to the [Belt and Road Initiative]”.

“Chabahar is part of this narrative, yet New Delhi is realistic enough to realise that matching the belt and road project is a Herculean task. Iran [is providing] India with the best opportunity to link with Central Asia and Afghanistan through this port, “ he said.

But Zhao said Iran could try to limit the port’s role in global politics.

“Even if India tries to make it a strategic port of geopolitical value, its plan may not be adopted or backed by Iran, which is not interested in any kind of Sino-Indian dispute and wants economic benefits,” he said.

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/dipl...-deal-key-iranian-port-potential-check-chinas
 
Well it is not hard to understand, India is a growing economy and when Pakistan was blocking Indian access to CAR region and AFG. India has a right to find alternate ways. INDIA also have a right to adopt counter strategy, if she feels to adopt to secure her trading and strategic routes.
 
Well it is not hard to understand, India is a growing economy and when Pakistan was blocking Indian access to CAR region and AFG. India has a right to find alternate ways. INDIA also have a right to adopt counter strategy, if she feels to adopt to secure her trading and strategic routes.


NSTC is a white elephant.

Freight companies will run into issues dealing with Iran, a country under sanctions, and any route transiting through Afghanistan is too unsafe.

Reality Check:

 
Sorry, it doesn't. Here is the list of member countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North–South_Transport_Corridor


You have proven yourself to be an idiot.


The International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC) is a 7,200-km-long multi-mode network of ship, rail, and road route for moving freight between India, Iran, Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Central Asia and Europe. (Wikipedia)

If you still don't get it. Refer to the Trilateral Transit Agreement and stop wasting my time.

Oh, so you are? I think you are just jealous.
Good day.


Kid, you're out of your depth. Keep embarrassing yourself.
 
A lease for one berth for a year and a half is supposed to counter China? And that in a country known to be allied to China? Great....:rofl::rofl::rofl:
The report was penned by a chinese and published in chinese newspaper refer to the link in first post ,thats why i just shared here.
 
If Indian navy can petrol Indian eez then the nation will be proud of them if without any incident.
Please don’t collide with any fishing boat or find some island or flip the ship upside down or blowing the sub in harbor.[emoji857]
 
You have proven yourself to be an idiot.


The International North–South Transport Corridor (INSTC) is a 7,200-km-long multi-mode network of ship, rail, and road route for moving freight between India, Iran, Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, Central Asia and Europe. (Wikipedia)

If you still don't get it. Refer to the Trilateral Transit Agreement and stop wasting my time.




Kid, you're out of your depth. Keep embarrassing yourself.

LOL, how is calling others an Idiot. One who can't read simple English and comprehend ???? LOL :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Where in the wiki page or INSTC website does it say that the route passes through Afghanistan ?????

Afghanistan is mere beneficiary, not even an observer, let alone a member state. :p:

Following are the list of Members:

India, Iran, Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Belarus, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Oman, Ukraine and even Syria.

Observer member - Bulgaria.


If you still have doubts, do care to check the official website from your Brethren, before unnecessarily ridiculing others for your blunder. :sarcastic::sarcastic::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

http://www.instc-org.ir/Pages/Home_Page.aspx
 
A lease for one berth for a year and a half is supposed to counter China? And that in a country known to be allied to China? Great....:rofl::rofl::rofl:

Yep they got a couple of berths to develop for 18 months because the pace of development was so slow.
The Iranians wouldn't give anything longer than 18 months and now its up to india to plough in the money to develop the bearths or face the consequences

You listen to the indian clowns and its as if iran has handed over the entire port to india as sovereign land so they can dock an indian naval force:cheesy:

This is is what you get when you watch too much bollywood
 
India is toiletless supa powa ready to dominate the world :rofl:

Its going to be funny watching them squirm when Pakistan becomes developed before them.


First get good Industrial policy before dreaming about Developed Nation.. is that joke or what..
 
LOL, how is calling others an Idiot. One who can't read simple English and comprehend ???? LOL :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

Where in the wiki page or INSTC website does it say that the route passes through Afghanistan ?????

Afghanistan is mere beneficiary, not even an observer, let alone a member state. :p:

Following are the list of Members:

India, Iran, Russia, Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Belarus, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Oman, Ukraine and even Syria.

Observer member - Bulgaria.


If you still have doubts, do care to check the official website from your Brethren, before unnecessarily ridiculing others for your blunder. :sarcastic::sarcastic::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:

http://www.instc-org.ir/Pages/Home_Page.aspx


Another idiot.


This is the claim:


INSTC is not through Afghanistan.


My response:


NSTC routes transit through Afghanistan


Futhermore,


If you still don't get it. Refer to the Trilateral Transit Agreement (TTA) and stop wasting my time.​


Here is the press release for TTA:


The three Ministers held discussions on Trilateral Agreement on Establishment of International Transport and Transit Corridor i.e. Chabahar Agreement which was signed by them on 23rd May, 2016 in Tehran in the presence of Prime Minister of India and Presidents of Iran and Afghanistan.

Source: Trilateral Meet between India, Afghanistan and Iran to Take Chabahar Agreement Further
(Press Information Bureau)​


TTA links NSTC routes via Chabahar to Zaranj in Afghanistan and then onward to Delaram and Garland highway. This provides India access to the four key cities in Afghanistan i.e. Herat, Kandahar, Kabul and Mazar-e-Sharif.

India needs routes to CARs via Afghanistan. This is an issue because Uzbekistan recently refused passage to Afghan goods on their way to China. Uzbekistan fears that Afghan routes will be used for drug trafficking — a key export of Afghanistan, emboldening the criminals-drugs-terrorists nexus and adversely impacting the security of the region.

Source: Afghanistan Struggles to Access China’s New Silk Road (Wall Street Journal, 2017)
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom