What's new

Indian army eyes soaring Kashmir bridge billed as 'game changer'

.
What happened during Operation Parakram ? The Pakistani position at point 5353 was destroyed by Indian artillery fire from surrounding peaks. Anyway, Pakistani armed forces are preoccupied and overstretched fighting TTP, BLA, PTI and other Pakistani civilians. They don't have the resources or willpower to fight the Indian armed forces.
Pakistani never wanted war with India, we still do not want war. We are a peaceful country which wants to normalize relations with just resolution of Kashmir issue. It is India which refuses to engage, thinking that it can some day take on Pakistan Militarily to the effect of taking Azad Kashmir away from Pakistan; and it is India which has weaponized water against Pakistan. All the hostility is from India which begets hostility from Pakistan in return.
 
.
kitna ssara "game changer" hai bhai........ kalko pradhan sevak / pappu ne tatti kar di, wo bhi "game changer" kahlayega.
 
.
Marpo La Peak Point 5353 is still with Pakistan. Pakistan dominates the LOC. Pakistani Artillery on peak 5353 can direct accurate artillery fire on to up to 20 km of Indian National Highway 1A, and cripple the Indian defensive positions from Mushkoh to Bhimbet.



The rarely told story of vital Point 5353 India failed to retake from Pakistan in Kargil​


SUJAN DUTTA
23 July, 2018 06:39 pm IST

Point 5310 is one Km inside Pakistan

Just like spider air defense system which shot down your own helicopter in 2019 😄
Every major air force including USAF, Israeli Air Force and PAF have had friendly fire incidents.

Pakistani never wanted war with India, we still do not want war. We are a peaceful country which wants to normalize relations with just resolution of Kashmir issue. It is India which refuses to engage, thinking that it can some day take on Pakistan Militarily to the effect of taking Azad Kashmir away from Pakistan; and it is India which has weaponized water against Pakistan. All the hostility is from India which begets hostility from Pakistan in return.
Who started 1965 and Kargil ?
 
.
Pakistani never wanted war with India, we still do not want war. We are a peaceful country which wants to normalize relations with just resolution of Kashmir issue. It is India which refuses to engage, thinking that it can some day take on Pakistan Militarily to the effect of taking Azad Kashmir away from Pakistan; and it is India which has weaponized water against Pakistan. All the hostility is from India which begets hostility from Pakistan in return.
The Maharaja of Kashmir had the right to accede his state to India. That is how Pakistan got Kalat, Bahawalpur, Chitral, etc. That was the just solution to the Kashmir issue.

Who sent troops to take Srinagar in 1947 ? Who did Operation Gibraltar in 1965 ? Who did the Kargil operation in 1999 ? Who trained Mujahideen for war in Afghanistan and Kashmir? If all the hostility is from India and Pakistan is a peaceful country, why does Pakistan also have regular gunfights on its borders with Afghanistan?
 
.
The Maharaja of Kashmir had the right to accede his state to India. That is how Pakistan got Kalat, Bahawalpur, Chitral, etc. That was the just solution to the Kashmir issue.

Who sent troops to take Srinagar in 1947 ? Who did Operation Gibraltar in 1965 ? Who did the Kargil operation in 1999 ? Who trained Mujahideen for war in Afghanistan and Kashmir? If all the hostility is from India and Pakistan is a peaceful country, why does Pakistan also have regular gunfights on its borders with Afghanistan?
Can we move past the history? We have may made mistakes based on our belief that we have rights over Kashmir but if there is noting to hide then why not let Kashmiris decide their own fate through an open plebiscite or allow a UN mandated solution?

P.S. The instrument of accession was never produced which also because a problem. And as per the agreed terms, areas which were predominantly Muslim would go to Pakistan so the matter is not straight forward.
 
.
Can we move past the history? We have may made mistakes based on our belief that we have rights over Kashmir but if there is noting to hide then why not let Kashmiris decide their own fate through an open plebiscite or allow a UN mandated solution?
Why not allow every district in KP and Balochistan to decide their own fate through a referendum?
P.S. The instrument of accession was never produced which also because a problem. And as per the agreed terms, areas which were predominantly Muslim would go to Pakistan so the matter is not straight forward.
Who agreed on these terms ? Is there any legal document. Please educate yourself on the terms of the India Independence Act. The ruler of every princely state was free to decide its fate. Jinnah tried his best to get Hyderabad, Junagadh, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bhopal - which all had Hindu majority. The only difference is that he failed and the Indian leaders succeeded in getting a part of Kashmir after fighting a war to defend it from Pakistani forces.
 
.
Why not allow every district in KP and Balochistan to decide their own fate through a referendum?
1. Because legally we are not bound to do that as they were a part of Pakistan upon independence.
2. Even if we did get a fair referendum, the overwhelming majority would vote to stay with Pakistan.

Who agreed on these terms ? Is there any legal document. Please educate yourself on the terms of the India Independence Act. The ruler of every princely state was free to decide its fate. Jinnah tried his best to get Hyderabad, Junagadh, Jodhpur, Bikaner, Bhopal - which all had Hindu majority. The only difference is that he failed and the Indian leaders succeeded in getting a part of Kashmir after fighting a war to defend it from Pakistani forces.
There were 2 conditions and you are simply referring to 1 of them; the other was that Hindu majority areas would go to Hindustan and Muslim majority areas would go to Pakistan. And by the way, where is the instrument of accession? Why wasn't it produced if the ruler had actually acceded to India? Any response to that?
 
.
1. Because legally we are not bound to do that as they were a part of Pakistan upon independence.
Kalat was an independent state on 14th of August 1947 and not part of Pakistan.
2. Even if we did get a fair referendum, the overwhelming majority would vote to stay with Pakistan.
How do you know until you hold the referendum ? India can also make the same claim.
There were 2 conditions and you are simply referring to 1 of them; the other was that Hindu majority areas would go to Hindustan and Muslim majority areas would go to Pakistan.
It seems you are ignorant about history. The religion-based division was for area under direct British rule, not for princely states. The decision about princely states was to be made by rulers. That is how Jinnah accepted the accession of Junagadh where more than 85% of population was Hindu and which was surrounded by India on all sides. He also tried to get other Muslim and even hindu rulers with Hindu populations to accede by offering them more privileges than India was offering.
And by the way, where is the instrument of accession? Why wasn't it produced if the ruler had actually acceded to India? Any response to that?
https://thewire.in/history/public-first-time-jammu-kashmirs-instrument-accession-india/amp/ here is a copy. You seem to be a victim of some conspiracy theory which says it was not signed. I have never heard this but this is simply not true. Mountbatten himself would have ensured it.
 
.
Can we move past the history? We have may made mistakes based on our belief that we have rights over Kashmir but if there is noting to hide then why not let Kashmiris decide their own fate through an open plebiscite or allow a UN mandated solution?

P.S. The instrument of accession was never produced which also because a problem. And as per the agreed terms, areas which were predominantly Muslim would go to Pakistan so the matter is not straight forward.
Isnt that convenient for you, first you claim Pakistan did not want war with India, then when given historical evidence contrary to your statement you ask to move past history. Would you please stick to one point and not shift goal posts as fits your needs?
 
. . . . .
The Indian Army’s Boosted Logistic Capabilities in Kashmir
1698235376550.png

Chenani-Nashri Tunnel

Indian Army logistic capabilities have improved profoundly in the disputed region of Kashmir in the last 25 years, mainly thanks to infrastructure development. Previously, limited road communications hindered the Indian Army’s supply lines in the mountainous region. The enhanced logistics holds considerable significance in mountainous terrain, such as Kashmir, where distances are measured in time, not space.

The recent construction and upgrades of roads and strategic tunnels have turned the tide in the favor of the Indian Army. Notably, the near completion of the new Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link (USBRL), anticipated to be concluded either by the conclusion of this year or in the initial months of 2024, will further augment the logistics capabilities.

The prevailing Indian Army thinking of Proactive Operations, commonly known as the Cold Start Doctrine, following the conclusion of Operation Parakram, prioritizes expeditious deployment of military assets in wartime. Kashmir, being a mountainous terrain, poses severe mobility challenges. The region is prone to landslides and harsh weather, and its roads are full of sharp turns and steep slopes.

In contrast, limited war – as envisioned by the Cold Start Doctrine – requires swift mobilization of war stores and personnel. To successfully execute the objective, it is imperative to possess a robust and efficient network of roadways and railway infrastructure. To fulfill that requirement, the Indian government allocated a colossal amount for road and rail infrastructure development in the territory of Kashmir. These funds were primarily directed toward three key sectors: the expansion and development of national highways that traverse through the region of Jammu and Kashmir, the construction of strategically important tunnels, and the establishment of a railway connection between the Kashmir valley and the mainland of India.

The initiation of this endeavor can be traced back to the Atal Bihari Vajpayee administration in the early 2000s, with subsequent governments continuing the implementation of this policy. However, the current government led by Narendra Modi, which assumed power in 2014, has made substantial investments in development initiatives in Kashmir. On July 18, 2014, the government of India established the National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) as a new organization under the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. The organization was entrusted with the responsibility of constructing infrastructure in border and mountainous regions in addition to the existing infrastructure. This organization is known as the Border Road Organization (BRO) and operates under the jurisdiction of the Indian Ministry of Defense.

One significant development is the USBRL railway line, which aims to establish a vital connection between the Baramulla district and the rest of India. This infrastructure project is expected to facilitate efficient transportation of individuals, commodities, and security personnel, enhancing mobility and connectivity. Former Prime Minister of India Vajpayee officially designated the matter as having “national importance,” to expedite the region’s socioeconomic progress, foster national unity, and fortify India’s “security infrastructure.”

The construction of the railway line was considered a daunting task but now it is on the verge of completion. The key hindrance was the construction of the renowned Chenab Bridge, the highest railway bridge in the world. The bridge is almost complete and will be open in either late 2023 or early 2024. It holds a special significance as it reduces by five to six hours the time it takes to travel from Katra in Jammu to Srinagar in Kashmir Valley. Additionally, the successful implementation of the rail project would grant Indian military forces an uninterrupted means of transportation to the valley, a strategic advantage that had previously been unachievable.

Apart from railways, road and highway development also saw a surge, especially after Modi came to power in 2014. His government doubled the construction of highways in the region by constructing 889 kilometers in only the first tenure of its government, compared to just 450 kilometers built under Congress’ reign from 2010-14. Modi allocated an 800 billion rupee package for the “Naya Jammu and Kashmir” development project, of which a large amount was spent on road infrastructure.

Many mega projects were commenced, including the four-lane strategic Jammu-Akhnoor-Rajouri-Poonch national highway, NH-144A, passing near the Line of Control separating the parts of Kashmir under Indian and Pakistani control. The NH-144A will reduce the distance from 200 km to 168 km. It is a crucial defense road likely to be completed by 2025.

Moreover, the 304 km stretch of the main Indian National Highway NH-44 from Kanyakumari to Kashmir was upgraded as well. The key stretch from Srinagar to Qazigund and Jammu to Udhampur was converted into four lanes to make traveling easy and rapid. The upgrade reduced the journey time between Jammu and Kashmir from 10-12 hours to 5-6 hours.

Moreover, considerable development took place in the construction of strategic tunnels in the region. Various tunnels were constructed, and many are in the process of completion. The key ones include the Z-Morh Tunnel, the Zojila Tunnel, the Chenani-Nashri Tunnel, the Chattergala Tunnel, the Nandni Tunnels and T-5 Tunnel, and the Qazigund-Bannihal Tunnel. All are vital, but the 14.15 km long Zojila tunnel holds special significance. When completed in 2026, it will ensure a safe passage to Indian Army convoys going toward Kargil and Leh year-round. Previously, such a journey would require traveling via Zojila pass, which is closed in the winter due to heavy snowfall. The tunnel will provide all-weather connectivity. Besides this, the tunnel will bring down the distance from 40 to just 13 kilometers and reduce the traveling time by one and a half hours.

Besides the Zojila Tunnel, the 870-meter T-5 Tunnel along with the Nandni tunnels (T-1, T2, T-3, and T-4) have contributed to easing logistical constraints. They are being constructed between the Banihal to Ramban section along treacherous mountainous terrain, prone to landslides all year. They will reduce the traveling time from three hours to only 25 minutes, bringing Srinagar and Jammu closer to each other.

How will these developments enhance the Indian Army’s ability to mobilize during wartime in the disputed region of Kashmir, aligning with its limited war doctrinal approach?
●First, the ongoing upgrades of road and rail infrastructure enables the Indian Army to promptly build up its forces along the Line of Control. It reduces the transit time for both troops and machines, a crucial factor during hostilities. India will be able to quickly replenish war stocks like armaments, ammunition, oil, lubricants, and petrol. The improved infrastructure will also allow for immediate casualty evacuation from the frontlines.

●For the first time, the Indian Army will be able to sustain uninterrupted supplies. Constructing tunnels at locations prone to natural hazards limits the probability of unwanted interruption. Finally, the Indian Army’s combat fighting capability will be boosted because forces and equipment can now be swiftly moved to different theaters of the region during war and crisis.

The recent infrastructure upgrade now presents a serious challenge to the Pakistan Army, as the current circumstance gives the Indian Army an advantage in the deployment of personnel and materiel during a crisis. As a result of the upgraded infrastructure, India’s logistics capability at the operational level of war is increased thanks to drastically lowered mobilization time in the mountainous Kashmir region. Previously, the Indian Army lacked this capability
. In the event of a new crisis between the two states, the Indian Army will bring its resources to the border and sustain them effectively and quickly.

@CallSignMaverick @White and Green with M/S @Zarvan @my2cents @SecularNationalist @Windjammer @arjunk @Areesh @Cheepek @VkdIndian @Raj-Hindustani @Skull and Bones @protean @MilSpec @Faceless @migflug @mig25 @Hellfire2006 @MirageBlue
 
Last edited:
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom