What's new

India world's largest recipient of arms, Pak and china both are third

This Indian comeback doesn't even make sense.
But responses like this make me happy for the future of China and the competitiveness of India in the global marketplace. Thank you. PISA was right.

Atleast try to make your responses comprehensible.
Try again.

Good luck ... once again !
 
.
Now I'm dead sure that our arms policy is not Pakistan centric. We don't need so much arms for Pakistan.

Off course its China we are preparing for. Well, whatever.

if china is india's main target then 'good luck'. LOL

India does not have the deep pocket to match china's arsenal.

india will crumble just like uSSR did back then.
 
.
^^^
tHATS THE THING iNDIA KNOWS WE CANNOT MATCH CHINA SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY ARE A DECADE AHEAD OF US. THEY STARTED THEIR MODERNIZATION IN 1990 AND WE, YOU CAN SAY IN 2000. WHAT INDIA IS DOING HERE IS, WE ARE TRYING TO PURCHASE MULTI ROLE AND MODERN EQUIPMENTS WHICH CAN DO MULTI ROLE AND WE DON'T HAVE TO PURCHASE MORE EQUIPMENTS. WE ARE TRYING TO MAKE THE BEST OF WHAT WE HAVE.

YOU THINK INDIA CAN MEET THE FATE OF USSR. WELL SORRY TO DISSAPOINT YOU BUT INDIA HAS A VERY ACTIVE OPPOSITION PARTY AND MEDIA. IF THE DEFENCE BUDGET WOULD HAVE CROSSED 45 BILLION $, THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE EATEN THE GOVERNMENT ALIVE.

NOT TO MENTION INDIAN POLITICS HAVE LESS ROLE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY THAN FARMERS AND CASTE AND RELIGION. I MEAN WE SPEND BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN SUBSIDY THEN WE SPEND BILLIONS AND BILLIONS ON DAILY JOB FOR POORS WERE POOR TAKES THE MONEY AND DON'T EVEN DO THE JOB AND MOST OF THE MONEY THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS THEMSELVES TAKE AND THEN WE JUST GIVE AWAY BILLIONS EVERY YEAR IN NAME OF AID.

OVERALL INDIA SPEND 100 BILLION $ IN DIFFERENT FORM ON POORS AND NOTHING CHANGES. I THINK WE SHOULD FIRST IMPROVE THE SYSTEM SO THAT ATLEAST ONE YEAR THIS 100 BILLION$ REACH POOR AND IMPROVE THEIR LIVES OR WE SHOULD SOLVE THE FUNDAMENTAL PROIBLEMS LIKE PROPER CONNECTIVITY FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND TO MARKETS, PROPER IRRIGATION SOURCE, FOOD SECURITY, HEALTH EDUCATION, SHELTER.
I MEAN AFTER THIS ONLY WE SHOULD WASTE MONEY LIKE WE WASTING RIGHT NOW.

..........................................................................................................................

jUST TO CLEAR THIS THING, PAKISTAN IS THIRD LARGEST IMPORTER IN ASIA. WHILE IN CASE OF INDIA AND CHINA, WE ARE TALKING WORLD LEVEL.

@ Hafizzz
ONE MORE POINT TO NOTE IS PAKISTAN IS SPENDING THIS MUCH EVEN WHEN ITS ECONOMY IS NOT EVEN IN THE TOP 15 ASIAN ECONOMIES. SO I THINK WHAT YOU SAID APPLIES TO PAKISTAN ALSO BECAUSE SIMPLY IT APPEARS EVEN IF PAKISTAN APPEARS TO GO BANKRUPT, THEY STILL ARE TRYING TO KEEP UP WITH INDIA. SO IT LOOKS LIKE US-USSR ANALOGY SUITS MORE IN INDIA-PAKISTAN CASE WITH PAKISTAN HAVING THE USSR ROLE RATHER THAN INDIA-CHINA.
 
.
^^^
tHATS THE THING iNDIA KNOWS WE CANNOT MATCH CHINA SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY ARE A DECADE AHEAD OF US. THEY STARTED THEIR MODERNIZATION IN 1990 AND WE, YOU CAN SAY IN 2000. WHAT INDIA IS DOING HERE IS, WE ARE TRYING TO PURCHASE MULTI ROLE AND MODERN EQUIPMENTS WHICH CAN DO MULTI ROLE AND WE DON'T HAVE TO PURCHASE MORE EQUIPMENTS. WE ARE TRYING TO MAKE THE BEST OF WHAT WE HAVE.

YOU THINK INDIA CAN MEET THE FATE OF USSR. WELL SORRY TO DISSAPOINT YOU BUT INDIA HAS A VERY ACTIVE OPPOSITION PARTY AND MEDIA. IF THE DEFENCE BUDGET WOULD HAVE CROSSED 45 BILLION $, THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE EATEN THE GOVERNMENT ALIVE.

NOT TO MENTION INDIAN POLITICS HAVE LESS ROLE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY THAN FARMERS AND CASTE AND RELIGION. I MEAN WE SPEND BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN SUBSIDY THEN WE SPEND BILLIONS AND BILLIONS ON DAILY JOB FOR POORS WERE POOR TAKES THE MONEY AND DON'T EVEN DO THE JOB AND MOST OF THE MONEY THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS THEMSELVES TAKE AND THEN WE JUST GIVE AWAY BILLIONS EVERY YEAR IN NAME OF AID.

OVERALL INDIA SPEND 100 BILLION $ IN DIFFERENT FORM ON POORS AND NOTHING CHANGES. I THINK WE SHOULD FIRST IMPROVE THE SYSTEM SO THAT ATLEAST ONE YEAR THIS 100 BILLION$ REACH POOR AND IMPROVE THEIR LIVES OR WE SHOULD SOLVE THE FUNDAMENTAL PROIBLEMS LIKE PROPER CONNECTIVITY FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND TO MARKETS, PROPER IRRIGATION SOURCE, FOOD SECURITY, HEALTH EDUCATION, SHELTER.
I MEAN AFTER THIS ONLY WE SHOULD WASTE MONEY LIKE WE WASTING RIGHT NOW.

..........................................................................................................................

jUST TO CLEAR THIS THING, PAKISTAN IS THIRD LARGEST IMPORTER IN ASIA. WHILE IN CASE OF INDIA AND CHINA, WE ARE TALKING WORLD LEVEL.

@ Hafizzz
ONE MORE POINT TO NOTE IS PAKISTAN IS SPENDING THIS MUCH EVEN WHEN ITS ECONOMY IS NOT EVEN IN THE TOP 15 ASIAN ECONOMIES. SO I THINK WHAT YOU SAID APPLIES TO PAKISTAN ALSO BECAUSE SIMPLY IT APPEARS EVEN IF PAKISTAN APPEARS TO GO BANKRUPT, THEY STILL ARE TRYING TO KEEP UP WITH INDIA. SO IT LOOKS LIKE US-USSR ANALOGY SUITS MORE IN INDIA-PAKISTAN CASE WITH PAKISTAN HAVING THE USSR ROLE RATHER THAN INDIA-CHINA.

Trust me india will crAsh because uncle SAM will force india to buy more and more while Pakistan is working with china to produce lots of indigenous stuff
 
.
Trust me india will crAsh because uncle SAM will force india to buy more and more while Pakistan is working with china to produce lots of indigenous stuff
Here we are again ..:rolleyes:
Another wannabe thinking India is USA's pet. well Mr. Hafizz, if US could force India to buy it's weaponry why didn't it do so in the MMRCA?? Or why isn't it able to stop India from purchasing Iranian oil??
 
. .
if china is india's main target then 'good luck'. LOL

India does not have the deep pocket to match china's arsenal.

india will crumble just like uSSR did back then.
China isn't India's "Target" so to speak- India is trying to prepare itself against a potential attack from the Chinese
The intention of buying arms is purely defensive, we cannot of course, afford to match China. However we do have enough money to arm our self in case of a conflict

By giving that link you are just enforcing my statemnt ,you know...:azn:
 
.
China isn't India's "Target" so to speak- India is trying to prepare itself against a potential attack from the Chinese
The intention of buying arms is purely defensive, we cannot of course, afford to match China. However we do have enough money to arm our self in case of a conflict

"Defensive' ??? China Centric agni missiles are not defensive but offensive
 
.
Russia and European countries have been raping (defense trade) India for ages, and we are happy to see India keeps that real world No.1 title, because that shows the total incompetence of India's industry ```lol
 
.
Russia and European countries have been raping (defense trade) India for ages, and we are happy to see India keeps that real world No.1 title, because that shows the total incompetence of India's industry ```lol

And what does being third prove about your industry? And having been first for decades, until 2006, what does that show about your industry? And what does being the third biggest importer despite having a budget that is 5 times smaller, and an economy 10 times smaller than India's, show about pakistan's industry?

Take your reasonings to their logical conclusions. Then pause and think.

And by the way you use the word raping quite liberally. Voluntary transactions where the buyer is happy to buy and the seller is happy to sell is not called rape. It is called free trade, which always benefits both parties concerned. Of course, I don't expect brainwashed communist-bots to understand the ABC of economics and trade.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom