India will never be as successful as China in economy

[Black Tornado]

You ignorant, HK is not Mauritus nobody, HKs GDP was close to 25% of chinas total GDP in the 1980s and much of 1990S, dont believe it for a such small place eh ? Dont make any more stupid comments about chinese FDI.

Whats the proof majority of investments from HK into China are not reroutes?

 

[etylo]

Whats the proof majority of investments from HK into China are not reroutes?

You have to come up with proof with your accusations based on your suspicious assumptions. HK is a financial
centre doesnt prove that HKs FDI in china are coming from other places through HK, thats only your Indian suspicion without evidence.

 

[Broccoli]

NO country can be as successful as China;
and the differentiating factor is not planning, education or anything else,

It is the single party system, that is much more efficient than western democracy model.

Is that the reason why they are stealing western IP 24/7?

 

[etylo]

Is that the reason why they are stealing western IP 24/7?

Any thing chinese got, whether tech or IP are stolen from you west. But, you shameless people cant come up with any evidence.

 

[MultaniGuy]

The way China eradicated poverty in their country, I want China to do the same political and social program in Pakistan.

 

[-=virus=-]

The way China eradicated poverty in their country, I want China to do the same political and social program in Pakistan.

Eh ? Why would you want the Chinese to help enforce their godless communist/capitalist hybrid system in Pakistan ?

You sure you want that even ?

or just the big shiny cities ?

Have the Saudis, UAE help with stuff.. that'd be more culturally compatible and acceptable to the Pakistani people I'm thinking, no ?

Explain what you meant, could you ?

 

[MultaniGuy]

Eh ? Why would you want the Chinese to help enforce their godless communist/capitalist hybrid system in Pakistan ?

You sure you want that even ?

or just the big shiny cities ?

Have the Saudis, UAE help with stuff.. that'd be more culturally compatible and acceptable to the Pakistani people I'm thinking, no ?

Explain what you meant, could you ?

Hey fvcktard.

I am not asking to implement atheism you bullheaded idiot.

I am asking China to implement Anti-Poverty social policies in Pakistan.

I too am also for the One-party state system in Pakistan like they have done in China.

Now shoo! You Indiot!

Eh ? Why would you want the Chinese to help enforce their godless communist/capitalist hybrid system in Pakistan ?

You sure you want that even ?

or just the big shiny cities ?

Have the Saudis, UAE help with stuff.. that'd be more culturally compatible and acceptable to the Pakistani people I'm thinking, no ?

Explain what you meant, could you ?

Saudi Arabia and UAE have invested a lot in Pakistan. No doubt about it.

But the Chinese have the biggest stake in Pakistan.

 

[Redbeanpaste]

NO country can be as successful as China;
and the differentiating factor is not planning, education or anything else,

It is the single party system, that is much more efficient than western democracy model.

If that Was true, Zimbabwe would be tiger economy by now as would The Philippines under Marcos or Haiti under Papa Doc. And at least 50 other dictatorships around the world.

 

[Sinnerman108]

If that Was true, Zimbabwe would be tiger economy by now as would The Philippines under Marcos or Haiti under Papa Doc. And at least 50 other dictatorships around the world.

There is a difference between corruption and one party system,
I don't think you understood what i was trying to say.

Is that the reason why they are stealing western IP 24/7?

Oh really ?
China produces more engineers per year, than there are a total sum of in the USA.

 

[MH.Yang]

If that Was true, Zimbabwe would be tiger economy by now as would The Philippines under Marcos or Haiti under Papa Doc. And at least 50 other dictatorships around the world.

The Philippines is not a one party country. Moreover, as a former colony of the USA, the Philippines has the same system as the USA.

 

[Redbeanpaste]

The Philippines is not a one party country. Moreover, as a former colony of the USA, the Philippines has the same system as the USA.

Marcos and his cronies ruled for 30 years. If dictatorship worked Philippines would have become a developed economy during that time, instead of the main source of Housemaids for the gulf.

I can't think of a single dictatorship anywhere that has been successful in the long term. If i have I missed some, I'll be happy to correct.

The jury is still out on China and the Chinese people certainly paid a big price for the economic success of the last few decades.

My question to you is , if China had been a democracy why do you think China would not have been even more successful?

And the Chinese people would not have been starved, killed, forced into abortions, laid off in mass.

You may have had a successful economy and freedom. Why do you think that is not possible?

 

[MH.Yang]

Marcos and his cronies ruled for 30 years. If dictatorship worked Philippines would have become a developed economy during that time, instead of the main source of Housemaids for the gulf.

I can't think of a single dictatorship anywhere that has been successful in the long term. If i have I missed some, I'll be happy to correct.

The jury is still out on China and the Chinese people certainly paid a big price for the economic success of the last few decades.

My question to you is , if China had been a democracy why do you think China would not have been even more successful?

And the Chinese people would not have been starved, killed, forced into abortions, laid off in mass.

You may have had a successful economy and freedom. Why do you think that is not possible?

Yes, China is not a successful country. India is a successful superpower with a population of 1.4 billion. Congratulations to you.

In addition, I suggest you learn about the dictator Park Chung Hee who ruled South Korea for 20 years. Under his rule, South Korea has changed from a low-income country to a high-income country.

After World War II, only two countries in human history developed from low-income countries to high-income countries, one is South Korea and the other is China.

 

[MH.Yang]

Marcos and his cronies ruled for 30 years. If dictatorship worked Philippines would have become a developed economy during that time, instead of the main source of Housemaids for the gulf.

I can't think of a single dictatorship anywhere that has been successful in the long term. If i have I missed some, I'll be happy to correct.

The jury is still out on China and the Chinese people certainly paid a big price for the economic success of the last few decades.

My question to you is , if China had been a democracy why do you think China would not have been even more successful?

And the Chinese people would not have been starved, killed, forced into abortions, laid off in mass.

You may have had a successful economy and freedom. Why do you think that is not possible?

I wonder why you American Indians think China is a dictatorship country.

I also need to remind you: The biggest sign of a dictator is that he will pass on power to his relatives or descendants.

You say that China is a dictatorship, but the descendants of Mao Zedong are historians, and the successor of Mao Zedong is Deng Xiaoping.
The descendants of Deng Xiaoping are the staff of the disabled persons' Federation, and the successor of Deng Xiaoping is Jiang Zemin.
Jiang Zemin's descendants are engineering professors, and Jiang Zemin's successor is Hu Jintao.
Hu Jintao's descendant is a tour guide, Hu Jintao's successor is Xi Jingping, and Xi Jingping's daughter is a researcher at the Translation Institute.

China has never had two Bush presidents, two Adams presidents, two Harrison presidents and so on.
The capital of China is called Beijing, neither Mao Zedong nor Deng Xiaoping. The capital of the USA is called Washington.

Look at how many officials in the Indian&USA govt have passed on their rights to their descendants.

I really don't know how shameless you American Indians have to be to dare to accuse the Chinese govt of dictatorship.

India&USA, two country full of nepotism and political families, has the face to accuse China of dictatorship. First of all, like China, you should have no political family, and then discuss the issue of dictatorship with us.

 

[Redbeanpaste]

I wonder why you American Indians think China is a dictatorship country.

I also need to remind you: The biggest sign of a dictator is that he will pass on power to his relatives or descendants.

You say that China is a dictatorship, but the descendants of Mao Zedong are historians, and the successor of Mao Zedong is Deng Xiaoping.
The descendants of Deng Xiaoping are the staff of the disabled persons' Federation, and the successor of Deng Xiaoping is Jiang Zemin.
Jiang Zemin's descendants are engineering professors, and Jiang Zemin's successor is Hu Jintao.
Hu Jintao's descendant is a tour guide, Hu Jintao's successor is Xi Jingping, and Xi Jingping's daughter is a researcher at the Translation Institute.

China has never had two Bush presidents, two Adams presidents, two Harrison presidents and so on.
The capital of China is called Beijing, neither Mao Zedong nor Deng Xiaoping. The capital of the USA is called Washington.

Look at how many officials in the Indian&USA govt have passed on their rights to their descendants.

I really don't know how shameless you American Indians have to be to dare to accuse the Chinese govt of dictatorship.

India&USA, two country full of nepotism and political families, has the face to accuse China of dictatorship. First of all, like China, you should have no political family, and then discuss the issue of dictatorship with us.

China is not a dictatorship ...yet 60 million people starved to death and the same party Still rules

China is not a dictatorship ...yet millions of women were forced to have abortions and the same party still rules

China is not a dictatorship... Yet 90 million people were laid off without notice and the same party still rules.

China is not a dictatorship ...yet millions of people were interred for following their religion and the same party still rules

It doesn't make any difference to me, if that's a price you people are willing to pay. Not many others would.

Ok bye. So long and thanks for all the fish.

 

[etylo]

China is not a dictatorship ...yet 60 million people starved to death and the same party Still rules

China is not a dictatorship ...yet millions of women were forced to have abortions and the same party still rules

China is not a dictatorship... Yet 90 million people were laid off without notice and the same party still rules.

China is not a dictatorship ...yet millions of people were interred for following their religion and the same party still rules

It doesn't make any difference to me, if that's a price you people are willing to pay. Not many others would.

Ok bye. So long and thanks for all the fish.

Yeah, more than one hundred million of indians starved to death over the years , hundred of thousands of indian babies are killed each year, more than 6 million indians perished in the pandemic in 2021, you call india a democracy without shame ? I learned all these facts on internet.