What's new

India tells Asean it believes in ‘open’ South China Sea

Global Fire power is inaccurate Countries like Finland, Australia, Sweden which have very good modern are ranked very low it needs to be redone.

globalfirepower mostly looks at pure military hardware, troops, and resources and does the comparison. they do not take into account training, exp, etc
 
because of 1962 war, many chinese forget how powerful the indian war machine has become

how it has evolved from a poorly equipped, undermanned force of 1962 to a well oiled military which was compered to the nazi war machine in 1971 (according to london times)

they also forget that while the chinese where struggling with the japanes in WW2, indians were fighting the japanese, germans, italians and british across 4 continents simultaneously

China in 1962 was even poorer than India (after the WWII/Civil War destruction and the Great Famine ), but it doesn't matter, China still managed to kick your a$$.

Today our war machine is far bigger than yours.
 
there wont be one. Why? because the chinese will never fight a war they will lose

How will they lose ? and what will cause another Sino-Indian war ?

---------- Post added at 09:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:56 PM ----------

globalfirepower mostly looks at pure military hardware, troops, and resources and does the comparison. they do not take into account training, exp, etc

It gives the overall strength not accurate in many things including newer and more advanced units were it has weaker countries stronger then the more powerful advanced countries.
 
It will be in their interests if they do ..and according to international law..if they follow the correct procedure, no one will oppose them.

They will have to work it out with their neighbors that's the bottom line the US will stay in the region.
 
China was in a civil war during the Japanese invasion yes Chinese have fought Japanese, and us in Korea including several other nations like the UK, Turkey, Philippians at one of it's weakest point. neither underestimate India or China.

But then the chinese were losing for the most part against the japs, at least they would have if it wasnt for the allies.

India on the other hand, well...


That great Indian Army (“British” being colloquial, not official) fought and defeated first-rate, first-world enemies: Germans in North Africa and Italy; the Imperial Japanese in southeast Asia. Stripped of Commonwealth camouflage, the Indian Army of 1945 was, in its own right, a veteran combat outfit with global experience.
Restitching the Subcontinent | The Weekly Standard
 
But then the chinese were losing for the most part against the japs, at least they would have if it wasnt for the allies.

India on the other hand, well...

It was ROC lost to the Japanese, but next time with PRC vs Jap, it will end up with Japanese getting slaughtered by PRC.
 
But then the chinese were losing for the most part against the japs, at least they would have if it wasnt for the allies.

India on the other hand, well...

Inaccurate read up on the Sino-Japanese war Japanese was halted many times it could not reach much deeper within after losing many battles, But the British Indian Army was divided when the Partition happened, Into India, Pakistan ,Bangladesh.

---------- Post added at 10:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:01 PM ----------

US is here to stay ..its demise is much exaggerated.

Of course it is however we are going through a period of somewhat decline however no demise.
 
Guys, Truong Sa, who started this thread, has been known to instigate verbal wars between the two most populous people in the world while she giggling on the sideline.
 
How will they lose ? and what will cause another Sino-Indian war ?

1.
in a nutshell, to invade an enemy, u need to have a 3:1 superiority ratio. for mountain terrain, the ratio becomes 5:1.

in 62, the chinese invaded with a 10:1 ratio. Now, they wont even get 2:1, not to mention advanced fighter bombers placed there such as su30mki

2. Tibet

It gives the overall strength not accurate in many things including newer and more advanced units were it has weaker countries stronger then the more powerful advanced countries.

correct. that too. Here, india has the clear advantage
 
China doesn't even take India seriously, but if India really wants to stick nose in our business, then maybe we should grant their wish this time.

They want a 62 rematch, maybe we should give them what they want.

You talking about the war easily, like the teenage pupils like to hit each other...
 
1.
in a nutshell, to invade an enemy, u need to have a 3:1 superiority ratio. for mountain terrain, the ratio becomes 5:1.

in 62, the chinese invaded with a 10:1 ratio. Now, they wont even get 2:1

2. Tibet



correct. that too

There are many accounts of the Sino-India war, actually China was better Experienced in Mountain warfare during that time and still is today, Tibet is a strategic place including very high, Whoever Holds Tibet holds the waters of Asia including the upper hand in victory yes it will be different then the Sino-Indian war of 1962 however Chinese still have an upper hand they have experienced Mountain warfare training many years in Tibet while India is currently building a defensive guard.

---------- Post added at 10:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:06 PM ----------

You talking about the war easily, like the teenage pupils like to hit each other...

War is fun for the people talking of it for the soldiers it's hell on either side. thankfully leaders are much more saner.
 
Back
Top Bottom