Chinese-Dragon
RETIRED TTA
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2010
- Messages
- 33,932
- Reaction score
- 52
- Country
- Location
We heard you the first time.
LOL it's funny when you arrange all his posts like that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We heard you the first time.
In India's case we are willing to do so,Our stance on Tibetian protests being a proof.Well, India is entitled to ignore Chinese sensitivities, and China is entitled to do the same to India, that is what I was trying to say.
Well, India is entitled to ignore Chinese sensitivities, and China is entitled to do the same to India, that is what I was trying to say.
Some Indian members suggest China should just let it go, that is hilarious.
This time India disrespects our concerns, next time we will do the same to you. I just hope there won't be some thread by Indians condemning China ignores your sensitivities.
i actually agreed with some of india members here on the point that chinese gov is a bit over reacted for this small issue. but then i had a second thought and think chinese gov is doing the right thing to send out a strong signal to the west hey enough is enough we are not going to take this lightly this time. chinese gov has been taking this nobel peace price sh!t for so long ever since dalai got it but didn't put in good efforts making too much troubles to the nobel peace price committe and the like behind. seems they are changing to adapt an aggressive strategy now because the old 'ignore' strategy didn't work. today's china has enough economic power to make a difference-- countries have to take side for this small issue, nobody will feel comfortable in this kind of situation. when nobody feels comfortable in a game ppl may start think if it's worth to do this game again in the future.
I've said this more than once but I couldn't give two sh*ts really. It's the big picture that counts.
I don't expect, nor do I believe, that anything good will come out of Indian relations with China.
Yes, but that's just a coincidence.
Would you please give me some insight about the big picture also?
i actually agreed with some of india members here on the point that chinese gov is a bit over reacted for this small issue. but then i had a second thought and think chinese gov is doing the right thing to send out a strong signal to the west hey enough is enough we are not going to take this lightly this time. chinese gov has been taking this nobel peace price sh!t for so long ever since dalai got it but didn't put in good efforts making too much troubles to the nobel peace price committe and the like behind. seems they are changing to adapt an aggressive strategy now because the old 'ignore' strategy didn't work. today's china has enough economic power to make a difference-- countries have to take side for this small issue, nobody will feel comfortable in this kind of situation. when nobody feels comfortable in a game ppl may start think if it's worth to do this game again in the future.
India have good diplomatic relation's with Norway,by abstaining from this function only after Chinese call,does not mean straining relation's with a friend?
Let me tell you something. When you don't give sh*ts, you just don't give sh*ts and people understand. You don't harp about not giving sh*ts.
Anyways, drink a glass of water, lit up a cig if you smoke and stop taking internet so seriously.
I think India has needlessly been dragged to west's conflict with China. We don't really care if west has a beef with china or vice versa, they should sort that out by themselves. Why dragging India in between, why not any other country like Brazil, Germany, Turkey etc!
I have said in another thread, the attitude taken by Indian towards the terrorist who are killing innocent Chinese is the attitude I am gonna take towards terrorists who are killing innocnet Indians.
Blocking a ban on an orgnization that is yet to be called terrorists is much better than harbouring a group of terrorists.
Once again I want to clarify I am not questionning India's choice, you are entitled to do what you deem is best for your interest.
But I, as a Chinese, can't ignore the fact Chinese interest is being harmed by India's decision to attend the ceremony.
You just answered your own question. Because we do not like India, and this action was just an unsurprising continuation of a typical mentality.
Thanks for the other thread by the way.
Two Buddhist Monks were on a journey, one was more senior than the other. During their journey they approached a rough and raging river. On the river bank they saw a young woman. She was clearly in need of help to cross to the other side of the river without drowning.
The junior monk walked straight past her without giving it a thought and crossed the river. The senior monk offered to help the woman and carried her across the river. Once across they parted ways and the two monks continued on their journey.
As the journey continued, the senior monk could see that the junior monk had something of concern on his mind, and asked what was wrong. The junior monk replied, "How could you carry that woman like that? You know we can't touch women, it's against our way of life". The senior monk answered, "I left the woman at the rivers edge a long way back, why are you still carrying her?"
In India's case we are willing to do so,Our stance on Tibetian protests being a proof.
Same cannot be said about China.
The denial of Visa to a Kashmir based general is naked and blatant way of putting it that you don't value our concerns/sensitivities.
Simple reason being that in no way India is of any use to China as long as we aren't an enemy's ally.
Yeah buddy tell me in exactly which post did I "expect" a different reaction from the GoI? I expected exactly this, it simply reinforced what I already believed.
Once again I want to clarify I am not questionning India's choice, you are entitled to do what you deem is best for your interest.
But I, as a Chinese, can't ignore the fact Chinese interest is being harmed by India's decision to attend the ceremony.