India is destroying sports in Pakistan

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Someone on this thread was mentioning suing India for arbitral award. Let me tell a short story.

In the late 90s, an American company, RiceTek, filed and got patents for basmati rice. The Indian government opposed this patent and filed a case with WTO and the US patent office. Since basmati is a Pakistani product as well, the Indian government asked Pakistan to join the claim. The Pakistanis said that while they can provide paperwork and evidence to support the claim, they cannot share the cost of legal proceedings as it is too high.

So the Indian government fought the case and got the patents over-turned. Today, as a result, India and Pakistan have a joint claim over basmati as a local geographic indication, which cannot be patented by anyone else.

There is no punchline to this story. It is just a sad reality that Pakistan wouldn't think twice about giving up its claim over one of its top exports, as long as the claimant is not India. But when it comes to India, they are always aware of their rights.

PCB is ready to sue you because it's not 90s sanctions time.

 

[gayMo]

It was India who was behind attack on Srilankan team.

Yes if you look atvthe map from west always India is placed behind pakistan

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Send me 1 million by Nigerian mail , as I recommended this approach (Consualtancy)

 

[Jacob Martin]

PCB is ready to sue you because it's not 90s sanctions time.

I have no doubt PCB is ready to sue BCCI. But tell me one thing, why doesn't PCB sue every other Board for refusing to travel and play in Pakistan? There is a loss of revenue there as well.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

I have no doubt PCB is ready to sue BCCI. But tell me one thing, why doesn't PCB sue every other Board for refusing to travel and play in Pakistan? There is a loss of revenue there as well.

Series have been played at neutral venue with mutual consent but thay are keeping their words and playing the series. India have no honour and is breaking the treaties.

 

[Jacob Martin]

Series have been played at neutral venue with mutual consent but thay are keeping their words and playing the series. India have no honour and is breaking the treaties.

Oh yes. The ICC Future Tours Program. So India has an obligation to play Pakistan under that. Well we will not be the first country to not honour an agreement for whatever reason. I am sure there is some legal provision to wriggle out of it.

Does Pakistan honour every commitment it makes?

 

[newindiandefence]

Hahaha nice name
India is destroying sports in Pakistan
U can also add
India destroying peace in Pakistan
India destroying entertainment in Pakistan
India destroying fashion in Pakistan
India destroying ...........

open your eyes
Your wahabizam is distorting sport
Distroying peace by killing Shia , sufi , or other non wahabies. By the name of terrorism yr govt and army in also involved.they are distorting minorities and name India . Why India do this they also suffering from this wahabi terrorism why India kill Shia in pak when Indian shia's support ing and helping Indian govt .. they are doing this and blem to India .

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Oh yes. The ICC Future Tours Program. So India has an obligation to play Pakistan under that. Well we will not be the first country to not honour an agreement for whatever reason. I am sure there is some legal provision to wriggle out of it.

Does Pakistan honour every commitment it makes?

ICC future tour program is was repalced by aggreements and MOUs between boards. You signed it and then pulled back from it.
We toured india honouring the aggreement but india broke the aggreement.
There isn't any legal provision to wiggle out of it just like indus water treaty.

 

[Jacob Martin]

ICC future tour program is was repalced by aggreements and MOUs between boards. You signed it and then pulled back from it.
We toured india honouring the aggreement but india broke the aggreement.
There isn't any legal provision to wiggle out of it just like indus water treaty.

What was the legal provision to wriggle out of Shimla Agreement? We will use the same.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

recently ICC gave points to Pakistan women team because india didn't fulfill the aggreement, to which ICC is a witness.

What was the legal provision to wriggle out of Shimla Agreement? We will use the same.

we want you to get out of simla aggreement. good for us. We will internationalize kashmir issue more strongly.

What was the legal provision to wriggle out of Shimla Agreement? We will use the same.

by the way, we never broke simla aggreement you did that.
Who went to UN on mumbai issue??
who captured siachin???
who captured 8 empty pakistani posts in 1973???
who recently said that kashmir is not a dispute but terrorism in kashmir is, trying to change part of simla aggreement ???

Which agreements has Pakistan been abiding by to expect the same from India? Simla?

 

[Tshering22]

Sue the PIG BCCI , making 300 Million per year causing damage to other countries

Why pig BCCI?

You've been doing a lot of constructive engagement with us haven't you?

Sending your peace-loving flower distributors across the borders with gun-shaped flowers and spreading love.

Be thankful it is only economical.

 

[Jacob Martin]

recently ICC gave points to Pakistan women team because india didn't fulfill the aggreement, to which ICC is a witness.


we want you to get out of simla aggreement. good for us. We will internationalize kashmir issue more strongly.


by the way, we never broke simla aggreement you did that.
Who went to UN on mumbai issue??
who captured siachin???
who captured 8 empty pakistani posts in 1973???
who recently said that kashmir is not a dispute but terrorism in kashmir is, trying to change part of simla aggreement ???

There is no honour among enemies. Simla Agreement asks for mutual settlement of bilateral issues. The moment Pakistan chose to dishonour it by trying to involve UN into Kashmir, all bets were off.

If you chose to ignore what was the cornerstone of our relationship from 1972, then it is laughable to expect us to adhere to an agreement on cricket tours.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

There is no honour among enemies. Simla Agreement asks for mutual settlement of bilateral issues. The moment Pakistan chose to dishonour it by trying to involve UN into Kashmir, all bets were off.

If you chose to ignore what was the cornerstone of our relationship from 1972, then it is laughable to expect us to adhere to an agreement on cricket tours.

the moement india tried to walk away from dialog on issues like kashmir, it was already broken.

then it is laughable to expect us to adhere to an agreement on cricket tours.

Plz tell this to the court when we are there.
Hope the judge listen to it.

There is no honour among enemies. Simla Agreement asks for mutual settlement of bilateral issues. The moment Pakistan chose to dishonour it by trying to involve UN into Kashmir, all bets were off.

If you chose to ignore what was the cornerstone of our relationship from 1972, then it is laughable to expect us to adhere to an agreement on cricket tours.

Pakistan never took kashmir issue to UN again but reminded UN about resolutions on kashmir which were passed before simla aggreement.

 

[Jacob Martin]

the moement india tried to walk away from dialog on issues like kashmir, it was already broken.


Plz tell this to the court when we are there.
Hope the judge listen to it.

It's not a court, it's an arbitration. First step is nomination and appointment of arbitrators. Hopefully the technicalities will be prolonged enough to bankrupt PCB.

the moement india tried to walk away from dialog on issues like kashmir, it was already broken.


Plz tell this to the court when we are there.
Hope the judge listen to it.


Pakistan never took kashmir issue to UN again but reminded UN about resolutions on kashmir which were passed before simla aggreement.

Subsequent agreement overrides any prior agreement unless it is specifically provided for within that agreement. Non-binding UN Resolution ceased to have effect at that point.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

Yes if you look atvthe map from west always India is placed behind pakistan

chankiya strategy revised edition by doval.

Subsequent agreement overrides any prior agreement unless it is specifically provided for within that agreement. Non-binding UN Resolution ceased to have effect at that point.

It's no where part of the aggreement that already placed UN resolutions are not effective.