NSG Commando
BANNED
New Recruit
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2009
- Messages
- 65
- Reaction score
- 0
Reported... next time be careful...IT IS UTTTELRY NONSENSE POST....
Why?? there is nothing offensive in his post?? Off topic is allowed in here..lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
Reported... next time be careful...IT IS UTTTELRY NONSENSE POST....
New Recruit
come on mate every country in this region has its own share of problems.yeah i know your farmers are billionaires,but most important thing do they have voting right's?ooh no did i say something wrong?i fully trust my government they have already started working in right direction.for your kind information our farmersunfortunately it is india closer to the stone age. many of your farmers unlike ours do not have access to vaccination, clean water, irrigation, hybrid crop technology, fertilizer, pesticide or schooling. instead india carries out agriculture, and presumably defense research as well, much like it did 8000 years ago in the stone age. lifespans in india and infant mortalities are also close to stone age levels.
I disagree, many here think supersonic missiles such as the Brahmos cannot be intercepted or neutralized.
I wouldn't relegate low flying,long range, low observable sub sonic cruise missiles to less important targets. The Brahmos is perhaps more effective when employed against time sensitive target OR for the purpose of shock and awe.
Reported... next time be careful...IT IS UTTTELRY NONSENSE POST....
Agree with you,I tend to Subsonic cruise missile like Tomahawk cruise missiles,
the shortcoming of Subsonic cruise missile is only one:the lower speed;but it can fly at the peak of wave5~10m,long range:2000km ,lower weight:1500kg,Launch platform compatibility,lower IR characteristics,lower price:1.2million$/Tomahawk,and more smart.
the advantage of supersonic missiles is only one:the higher speed,but if the radar can trace it,and the antimissile can broke it,2~3MACH is lower than the ballistic missile;and it only can fly at lowest 20m,short range 300km,bigger:3000kg,higher IR characteristics,its engine like a big moon at night,radar can see it at more than 30km away,and higher price :3.1million$/1BrahMos,and poor anti-interference ability:the high speed let it miss the target even under 0.1second interference
u forgot to add ur stones and arrows.We would have believed that also.
unfortunately it is india closer to the stone age. many of your farmers unlike ours do not have access to vaccination, clean water, irrigation, hybrid crop technology, fertilizer, pesticide or schooling. instead india carries out agriculture, and presumably defense research as well, much like it did 8000 years ago in the stone age. lifespans in india and infant mortalities are also close to stone age levels.
Well you guys are good at reporting nonsense of others, but don;t report the nonsense of your own.
You reported the above post, but you left to report the post of your own who started the dual first.
Typical.
Here is a list of comparable missiles to ESSM:
HQ-17 · HQ-7 (FM-80) · HQ-64 (LY-60) · HQ-6 · HQ-61 · TY-90 · DK-9 · CQW-2 · FLS-1 · FLG-1 · FLV-1 · FL-2000(V) · SG-2 ADS · LS ADS · YT ADS · FB-6A · FL-3000N · HN-5C · TD-2000 · TD-2000B
those are our short range SAMs. they'd be quite enough to intercept Brahmos.
http://www.raytheon.com/capabilitie...cuments/content/rtn_rms_ps_essm_datasheet.pdf
RIM-161 SM-3 (AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense)
AN/SPY-1 Radar
Do you have anything comparable to these? Then you can talk about CM and BM defence. Right now you need to develop more than what you have to defeat the Bhramos and I dont know about the Nirbhay as it aint ready yet.
can you tell me what chill's post about sticks and stones had to do with anything?
if not then this is double standards.
Brahmos is a joint venture and limited to 300 km range due to MTCR.
India is looking for cruise missile with over 1000 km range.
Out of range and speed one has to sacrifice one in order to keep the size and expense in control.
Nirbhay chooses to sacrifice speed in favor of range. Also this makes it a very inexpensive missile. One can buy ten Nirbhay in place of a single Brahmos.
Brahmos = Quality (High-End)
Nirbhay = Quantity (Low-End)
We can't do with a single missile. Got to have options.
Actually, conventionally-guided supersonic CMs have many weaknesses, not just warhead size. That is why the United States, Russia, France and China stopped developing them. Russia had to dump the outdated tech somewhere.
1) Supersonic missiles has to fly higher which causes them to be picked up earlier by ship radars.
2) They have 20 to 50 times larger infrared signature, which would allow IRSTs to pick them up, easily.
3) The have less time for target acquirement. When facing ECM, they don't have a second chance.
4) Supersonic costs more than subsonic
5) Non-GNSS cruise missiles have extremely low accuracy. This is evident through Brahmos' tests where Mach 2.5 is easily achieved but often fails to hit the target. With the limited payload of cruise missiles, the weapon is considered obsolete if it does not have a 10m error radius.
6) Even the Chinese were smart enough to stop developing conventionally guided CMs in favour of GNSS. I guess India has to learn how to walk before run.
Out of 21 tests the Bhramos failed only once ans the CEP is less than 2 meters. If you term that as inaccuracy then I think you are delusional.
Missile Technology Control RegimeBuddy, how far does it hit? How far does Tomahawk hit?