True...Maybe its best to classify Pathans as a separate nation.However quite a few Afghans I spoke to in Pakistan and some from Afghanistan have a clear hatred of their fellow Pathan here in Pakistan.. da walay??.anyway.. off topic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One misinformation that the Indians have about Pakistan. Going through middle school in Pakistan upto 10th grade, the Pakistan Education Board's ciricullam included Ashoka, Chandra Gupta Moriya, Marhats etc.., so the notion that Pakistan is not aware of history is not true. Western countries try to manipulate history. Example: Alexandar the Great, Alexander was a homo sexual and he was defeated by Chandra Gupta Moriya, so how he can great. Great was Salahuddin that never was defeated, but Eurepeon historians will never say that.
To the gentlemen trying to own onto India's history as either This side's or that side.Let me say this:
before the Lucknow pact you were the same people with a common history, Religion was the major reason for division and rightly so.
But to think that only the Indian has right over Asoka or only the Pakistani has a right over Aurangzeb is wrong. These people were from amongst you, and most of India in their times still took them as their kings. most of those people are your ancestors. Even the Pathans who have more in common with Afghans still were culturally influenced by those from Bengal. Islam did not properly arrive in India till the 700 AD's and even then, most if not all Indians then converted and even now many of the Muslims on both sides are from the lineage of converts.Many people trace their lineage back to the prophet with pride through middle eastern Sufi and orthodox preachers but fail to see that they too converted people through which many Muslims in India and Pakistan are descended from. So while the average Subcontinent Muslim may ignore it, Asoka was as much the king of his genetic forefathers as it was of someone in Mumbai. The same goes for the average Hindu who would have genetic forefathers serving in Akbar or Sher Shah Suri's army.
Religious history which involves the all Muslims or Hindu's and does not allow Pakistani's to lay claim to Khalid bin Waleed's military prowess as part of their hereditary inheritance. Nor should it force the Indian's to disown Tipu Sultan as somebody who does not deserve recognition in the history of India as somebody who resisted an Invader to the end for his land which was Mysore.
In a nutshell, The history of India is nobody property which includes the Indus valley civilization and the Aryan Invaders..to Ranjit Singh and The first world war where Indians died for the British in the trenched of Europe
One misinformation that the Indians have about Pakistan. Going through middle school in Pakistan upto 10th grade, the Pakistan Education Board's ciricullam included Ashoka, Chandra Gupta Moriya, Marhats etc.., so the notion that Pakistan is not aware of history is not true. Western countries try to manipulate history. Example: Alexandar the Great, Alexander was a homo sexual and he was defeated by Chandra Gupta Moriya, so how he can great. Great was Salahuddin that never was defeated, but Eurepeon historians will never say that.
Santro Afghans and Pathans is almost same thing if you exclude the current nationalities based on border lines. We have same bloodline.
The title of the thread should be modified..
Pakistani's trying to copy Indians copying western lifestyle.
However, I have in my comparatively recent trip to India(6 years ago) seen the average Indian and he/she has not adopted..but rather adapted the western culture into his/her Indian lifestyle. The average 23ish university bound urban Indian will still go the the temple/mosque/church yet has no qualms about hitting the club or taking a walk on the beach with his girlfriend(a growing trend effecting both our countries). The average Indian does want his/her Gucci but will settle for a local designer as well, the Pakistani will go for the local designed only if he/she is famous and if he/she cant afford Prada. Language use is mixed across the spectrum but generally people tend to stick to Hindi with varying levels of English interleaved which is the same in Pakistan with Urdu.It was only in a few strict Hindu households where I saw the use of Sanskrit, otherwise the only actual difference I felt was that everybody was darker skinned.I spoke the same as I would with my friends here, and nobody looked at me like an alien(except the few ignorant who expected a Pakistani to come in a Sherwani and Jinnah cap),There is a difference, but if not for the burden of politics past we can get along easily with the City Indian, I did see some RSS elements draped in orange with deep red tilaks(thats what it is right??) but they seem to have more influence over the lower classes.
One thing which sets India apart is the lack of excessive showing off. While brand names are desired they are not an obsession. And rarely do you see a flashy car even in some cases where it is easily affordable. The same applies to eating habits and unless dining out in a posh restaurant the Indian Hindu prefers to have one simple dish or the venerable Thali. Muslims in India are a little more open in their culinary expenditures but due to cultural concerns I never saw beef at any meal(I do not wish to hurt the sentiments of Hindu members but they are missing out on the delight that is a well done tenderloin steak, but the same could be said to Muslims about ham), It is generally easier to have a meal in a Sikh household as they don't seem to have reservations about using the same utensils as people not of their religion, but I may be wrong and this Hindu tradition may be on its way to being phased out.
Class divisions are still there but are rapidly increasing, However India has benefited from a growing middle class which is matching the growth of its poor, education being its primary catalyst. In Pakistan the situation is opposite, rampant corruption is creating pockets of upper class which unlike India have no interaction with any of the lower classes and in turn are increasing the gap. The upper middle class is being absorbed into the upper class, anything below that is being pushed further down the order.
Overall, The balance between western and indigenous culture is more on an even keel in India with the exception of the discarding of some strict religious rules in urban areas.
In Pakistan however, Find a tailor named Shabbir, and put him in a shop called "Shabz". We will buy!, The need to prove ourselves more modern than our neighbors has buried itself deep within us. I credit it to a lack of national Identity and our need to identify a single cohesive culture which might tie us together with different sub-cultures within it, something India has accomplished.
So.. from my point of view.. change the title .. then discuss.
Well, the Pakistani look is not native to India. Though I believe he was trying to say that there are more "Pakistani look" people in India than in Pakistan itself! I'd like to see the survey that confirms this remarkable observation of his. But even if it was true (which in all honestly, I'm 100% sure it's not), the "set look" of Pakistan is different from the "set look of India", just as the "set look" of Germans is different to the "set look" of Zambians and so on.
I suppose you meant movies.. .
and true.. the trend has emerged .. (I PARTICULARLY DESPISE the soap opera's with my heart.. on both sides.). Business plans if successful deserve to be copied.
but the trend has increased since the advent of television..and the failure of Pakistani cinema.
However.. the movies are not copied.
We just watch yours..
Yup.. the old PTV soaps were extremely good... Urusa, Sitara aur Mehrunisa..etc.
But that was due to very cultured and educated people sitting at the helm of affairs. People who were weeded out for financial gains, racial bias, the works. These days its all about commercialism.. not culture. The same can be said of Indian cinema.My favorite example is Devdas.. in case of remakes I always see the original first. Once I had seen the Dilip version.. and the simplicity through which he meets Paaro after he returns... 15 min into the SRK movie and I walked out of the room.. And I DO not THink Aishwariya even comes close to the top 100 most beautiful women.. but then we are going wayy off topic here