KAL-EL
PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Messages
- 7,311
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Japan was scare, but the US was/is more frightening.
Don;t forget though. Japan had Shin Hayata.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Japan was scare, but the US was/is more frightening.
Japan was scare, but the US was/is more frightening.
On this?
Look at the huge numbers of aircraft carriers Japan had back in the 1940's, or the number of aircraft carriers America has today.
For China, we got our very first "training carrier" in 2012.
So why are people scared of us, seriously? It's not like we can't afford to build masses of aircraft carriers, instead we sunk $4 trillion into our currency reserves, and multiple times more on domestic investment (every year).
Where did you get this picture of me, KAL-EL?
Look at the huge numbers of aircraft carriers Japan had back in the 1940's, or the number of aircraft carriers America has today.
For China, we got our very first "training carrier" in 2012.
So why are people scared of us, seriously? It's not like we can't afford to build masses of aircraft carriers, instead we sunk $4 trillion into our currency reserves, and multiple times more on domestic investment (every year).
Where did you get this picture of me, KAL-EL?
Because you will eventually have a lot of carriers. A lot more than Japan will have in the future.
Because you will eventually have a lot of carriers. A lot more than Japan will have in the future.
Because you will eventually have a lot of carriers. A lot more than Japan will have in the future.
IMHO, China should field as many carriers that their armed forces deem fit, afterall they are only doing what the feel is for the defense and strategic position of China's Armed Forces. China has 3 fleets: North Sea Fleet, East Sea Fleet and South Sea Fleet. She should at least have 3 carriers; 1 carrier battle group per fleet. At least.
If she decides to add more later, then this would serve to her military strategem.
Today, no one can successfully invade China on land. In 10-20 years, even the USN will have problems facing off against us in our own waters. That's all we need for our own defence really, why go further?
Most global hegemonies will go further. I think in the LONG run, it'll have interests and assets to protect globally.
China's official policy is to: "Never seek hegemony" (永远不称霸).
You can't really hide large-scale construction of aircraft carriers.
By 2030 we will have three, so will Japan, and so will India. It will be adequately balanced, nothing more.
policy: 如果你想饼干,我会给你。
I guess you're riggggghhhhhttt..
You're going to give me a cookie? Give it to me then.
Anyway, that's our official policy. Along with "China's peaceful rise".
You can believe it or not, skepticism is absolutely understandable, but in the end that is our policy.
China is a world of it's own, we will never need to be an interventionist hegemon in the way that the USA currently is. Our Shale gas reserves alone are enough to last us thousands of years, and that's not even mentioning our stupendous potential in terms of renewable energy.
Japan was scare, but the US was/is more frightening.
During that time, we fielded one of the greatest battleships ever to sail the open seas. The Yamato Class Battleship.
只有当你承认,你就建成10载体。