EVERYONE has an opinion; you have one. The contents are noted.
To be quite honest, the views are so flimsy as to make it difficult to answer. It's like saying your friend's aunt was pretty, but now she isn't. Our troops were good enough in 47-48; in 65; in 71 (on the western sector); in 99.....so where does one draw the line? When did you discover Indian troops to be not good enough? What made you think so, just the way you felt after burning the toast, or was there anything more material?
I am sorry, but these claims that India is now radically different and has deteriorated sound incongruous (the politest word I could find). It is based on a personal opinion, one that is less than neutral and is less than free from bias. If you have a logical point to make, go ahead; if not, then this sort of post is just 'noise', as in noise to signal ratio.
And a good day to you, too.
And they had wonderful teachers too, as this thread shows.