Huang Jing: Time for Asian G2

[Aeon]

better to work with india than with the US. the indian, japanese and southeast asian markets can sustain our growth for years as the japanese population ages and demand for biomedical devices increases, and as india and southeast asia develop.

eventually, the entire landmass of eurasia can return to being the center of civilization and the americas back where they belong, at the periphery of humanity and only useful as sources of slaves and resources.

Guess I wasn't too far from the truth last time ... rampaging forward yet again indeed (not that I have a problem with it)

That is the goal.

I wasn't expecting that from you. You don't rampage. No, you're just cool & proper...& deadly.

 

[CAPTAIN AMERICA]

yeah you are right ,please get real india, you are not on par with china yet , we are way way ahead, india is just not in china's league , as in football terms india is in div3 while china is in the premier league, please stop your wet dreams any more comparsion with china only make your self a complete fool.

In the long run I would bet on India, because its a seems to growing democracy.

China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise
China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise -- Seeking Alpha

Investors’ Verdict…

A handful of Chinese moon shots notwithstanding, the Chinese stock market has been one of the worst performers in the world during the past 12 months — and has trailed India’s stock market by a substantial margin.

Russell Napier of investment bank CLSA has warned investors not to get fooled by China’s superficial order and India’s apparent chaos. Napier makes a compelling argument for why you are more likely to make money investing in India than China. India has a far more established private-sector financial system. Chinese banks still are acting as the long arm of the Communist Party, funding pet projects and state-owned enterprises. India uses capital much more productively than China. India’s driver of economic growth is consumption instead of volatile exports

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

In the long run I would bet on India, because its a seems to growing democracy.

China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise
China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise -- Seeking Alpha

Investors’ Verdict…

A handful of Chinese moon shots notwithstanding, the Chinese stock market has been one of the worst performers in the world during the past 12 months — and has trailed India’s stock market by a substantial margin.

Russell Napier of investment bank CLSA has warned investors not to get fooled by China’s superficial order and India’s apparent chaos. Napier makes a compelling argument for why you are more likely to make money investing in India than China. India has a far more established private-sector financial system. Chinese banks still are acting as the long arm of the Communist Party, funding pet projects and state-owned enterprises. India uses capital much more productively than China. India’s driver of economic growth is consumption instead of volatile exports

Did you even read that article? This is not 70 years ago (when you were young), nowadays you actually have to read the whole thing.

Here you go:

But it turns out that there is little correlation between economic growth rates and stock market returns — especially in markets like China.

They are talking about the STOCK market, not the Economy. As in the above quote, they are not directly correlated.

The reason why China is getting so much Foreign direct investment is because of the huge overseas Chinese community. Not because westerners are betting on our stock markets, at least not in large amounts.

 

[jha]

Did you even read that article? This is not 70 years ago (when you were young), nowadays you actually have to read the whole thing.

BTW the post did not deserve a reply....

 

[ChinaChina]

In the long run I would bet on India, because its a seems to growing democracy.

China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise
China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise -- Seeking Alpha

get real my friend the hare vs the tortoise is a fairy tale, in the story the hare got arrogance and fall to sleep and u think china would allow that to happen?

 

[Brotherhood]

[COLOR=In the long run I would bet on India,[COLOR="Red"] because its a seems to growing democracy[/COLOR].

Seriously, how many times you need to make a fool out of yourself, my dear self-proclaim American? i thought my English was terrible, you just made me feel like Shakespeare with your one liner quote.
A friendly suggestion; get back to with your copycat skill, you might get away easier than trying too hard writing post on your own to troll.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

We Indians have common myth that when China adopted Buddhism they got Indianized(term borrowed from the book Clash of Civilizations) i.e it had a cultural impact,the truth is that it was just adoption of religious principles which they preferred and mixing them with their traditional religions like Confucianism and Taoism etc.
Same goes for Japan too,you won't find pure Buddhism there,as there will some influence from Shintoism too.

Buddhism is a fundamental part of Chinese culture.

You're right though, in that it is mixed with Confucianism and Taoism.

Maybe this fact will help to to save the China-India relationship one day.

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Seriously, how many times you need to make a fool out of yourself, my dear self-proclaim American? i thought my English was terrible, you just made me feel like Shakespeare with your one liner quote.
A friendly suggestion; get back to with your copycat skill, you might get away easier than trying too hard writing post on your own to troll.

Yes I recommend that he continues to copy and paste (plagiarise) from other websites... because at least it will make sense.

 

[SHHHHH]

China and India have NOTHING IN COMMON whereas China, Singapore,Taiwan, S. Korea, Japan and HK are all Confucius countries.

Japan's economic growth isn't as quick as India's or China's
And the potential of growth these two countries posses is more than Japan.
Singapore,Taiwan,S.Korea etc.have a much smaller GDP size when compared to China ,India.

 

[SHHHHH]

In the long run I would bet on India, because its a seems to growing democracy.

China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise
China vs. India: The Hare vs. the Tortoise -- Seeking Alpha

get real my friend the hare vs the tortoise is a fairy tale, in the story the hare got arrogance and fall to sleep and u think china would allow that to happen?

You see,the arrogance you are presenting is the answer ,you have a long way to go,just like us,but instead of working harder you concentrate at boasting.

Thats the danger!

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Japan's economic growth isn't as quick as India's or China's
And the potential of growth these two countries posses is more than Japan.
Singapore,Taiwan,S.Korea etc.have a much smaller GDP size when compared to China ,India.

Yes both China and India, will certainly surpass Japan in terms of economic size. (China has already done it and India will follow soon).

Japan has been the second largest economy in the world for decades and decades.... now they will be surpassed by both China and India.

Which is why cooperation between our two nations is essential.

 

[muse]

An integrated, united Asia - novel? An Asian istitution devising mechanisms to bring solutions to problems in Asia. About time, needless conflicts have been a terrible drain on resources and have spread tragedy, misery among Asians. Let the idea win in your mind, speak of it with others, propagate the idea.

 

[CAPTAIN AMERICA]

Yes both China and India, will certainly surpass Japan in terms of economic size. (China has already done it and India will follow soon).

Japan has been the second largest economy in the world for decades and decades.... now they will be surpassed by both China and India.

Which is why cooperation between our two nations is essential.

In GDP yes, in per capital GDP no where close, if you have a billion people in one country with a GDP the same as a 100 million in another country, in which country are the people much better off. Which country is going to have better education, better school, better medical care, better roads, and larger defense.

Example: . If a country had a 2% GDP growth rate, but a 3% population growth rate, its per capita GDP growth rate would actually be negative, at -1%.
http://www.eoearth.org/article/economic_growth

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

In GDP yes, in per capital gdp no where close, if you have a billion people in one country with a GDP the same as a 100 million in another country, in which country are the people much better off. Which country is going to have better education, better school, better medical care, better roads, and larger defense.

Obviously.

It's GDP per "capita"... not "per capital gdp" which doesn't make any sense, as usual. You're 70 years old, I have no idea why you find it so hard to write simple sentences.

I live in Hong Kong anyway which has a high GDP per capita. Hong Kong got to this stage of development very quickly and I have no doubt this will happen to the mainland too.

 

[below_freezing]

Obviously.

It's GDP per "capita"... not "per capital gdp" which doesn't make any sense, as usual. You're 70 years old, I have no idea why you find it so hard to write simple sentences.

I live in Hong Kong anyway which has a high GDP per capita. Hong Kong got to this stage of development very quickly and I have no doubt this will happen to the mainland too.

he's a moron that doesn't know basic economics and forgets that 1.) labor costs are different in each country 2.) some goods are public goods with a fixed cost regardless of how many people use them.

a good example is a high speed train that actually becomes more economically feasible with the higher population.

another thing is that he neglects the fact that more people are capable of producing more wealth. what if the US was nuked down to 5 ppl? think the US would still be the richest country in the world with a 2 trillion USD GDP/capita?