HQ 9 / FD2000 spotted in Pakistan

[Muhammad Omar]

yes, yes he did...using his vedic ultra satellite tikinalijy!

Darn it vedic ultra satellite of certified supa powa 2020

 

[Deino]

View attachment 603669 View attachment 603670

Oh no, not that idiot again!

 

[LKJ86]

China was working on some S-400 counterpart, name starts with HQ but don’t remember the 2 digits after.

Any idea ?

As I said before, the development pattern of China's air defense systems is not the same as that of Russia.

Take S-400 for example, there are several kinds of missiles in one system. And there is only one kind of missile in HQ-9.

So, China won't develop a system similar to S-400.

 

[GumNaam]

Pdf?

yeah.

As I said before, the development pattern of China's air defense systems is not the same as that of Russia.

Take S-400 for example, there are several kinds of missiles in one system. And there is only one kind of missile in HQ-9.

So, China won't develop a system similar to S-400.

is it accurate to say that russia develops different types of missiles to cover different parameters and ranges under the label of s400 while China develops 1 missile to cover all of those parameters and ranges under the name of HQ-9(or HQ-19)?

 

[LKJ86]

is it accurate to say that russia develops different types of missiles to cover different parameters and ranges under the label of s400 while China develops 1 missile to cover all of those parameters and ranges under the name of HQ-9(or HQ-19)?

No.
S-400 has to finish all jobs of HQ-16, HQ-22, HQ-9, and so on.

 

[StormBreaker]

yeah.


is it accurate to say that russia develops different types of missiles to cover different parameters and ranges under the label of s400 while China develops 1 missile to cover all of those parameters and ranges under the name of HQ-9(or HQ-19)?

No,
S-400 system uses diverse variety of missiles while China produces multiple HQ-9 variants with one missile type for each variant

 

[Basel]

HQ-22 also looks similar to HQ-9:
View attachment 603655 View attachment 603656 View attachment 603657 View attachment 603658

What capabilities it have??

 

[LKJ86]

What capabilities it have??

HQ-22 can be called a low-cost variant of HQ-9.

 

[Basel]

HQ-22 can be called a low-cost variant of HQ-9.

But what is difference between capabilities of both?

 

[LKJ86]

But what is difference between capabilities of both?

The range of HQ-22 is over 100km, and China uses it to replace HQ-2.

 

[TheTallGuy]

@NA71 @The Eagle

JY-27 radars, HQ16/22/HQ9, Pantsir SM and what is the last piece of puzzle to complete?

 

[Basel]

The range of HQ-22 is over 100km, and China uses it to replace HQ-2.

Does China have something similar to BUK-M-3?? As it can move with ground forces and provide them good protection to 70km range with capability to take on SRBMs.

 

[YeBeWarned]

Can it match S-400 ?

we don't have to match S-400 , we have to find a way to counter it, for example Advance EW Systems and Next Generation Long Range CM/SOW's .

 

[Pakistani Fighter]

It is in the best interest of Pakistan to neither confirm or reject this news.

It's a system whose mobility brings a surprise for the enemy. And we love to kill it.

Is it more mobile than S400? Is it comparable to S400?

 

[Bilal.]

we don't have to match S-400 , we have to find a way to counter it, for example Advance EW Systems and Next Generation Long Range CM/SOW's .

The future is low cost swarming munition. It will render all these systems obsolete.