friendly_troll96
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 29, 2010
- Messages
- 3,857
- Reaction score
- -10
- Country
- Location
until the cows come home!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you know which book provide evidence of Buddha being from the Suryavansha lineage ?
The Vinshu Puran.
The interesting fact is that since the Gotra of Buddha was Gutama, it meant that his gotra was a Brahmin gotra, and not a Kshatriya gotra.
This is the evidence of merit based "Varna" which over time converted Men from a Brahmin gotra into a Kshatriya clan.
I have already proven that he was not. He was not Tibeto-burman. In fact his gotra clearly shows he was an Vedic India.
People from the Gautama Gotra still exist in India today.
French...British. Hwah u seems proud of your european heritage. If so n then again, y intentionally choose to downplay the British Raj's contribution to the formation of India?French did control and influence a large part of India in the 18th century.
The British however did not own whole of India. Multiple independent kingdoms exited in India during British times.
It was a free India that consolidated all these kingdoms into a single union called Bharat.
Interesting, whole life, really ?If we are gonna have a debate about ethnicity of the Buddha, then let's pull sources..I am up for it..I have been studying this my whole life as a practicing Buddhist
He was within 5 kms of present Indian border--his birthplace..All the ancient scriptures say he looked no different than the Biharis he mingled with.
before french and british, Portuguese came and use to trade with us. They setup a factory in 1500's. The western deccan plateau has still portuguese influence in India. If you don't have knowledge about Indian history please don't debate on thatFrench...British. Hwah u seems proud of your european heritage. If so n then again, y intentionally choose to downplay the British Raj's contribution to the formation of India?
No British = no India
India was built on the backbone of British imperialism.
Undeniable.
Interesting, whole life, really ?
I am no Buddhist and not into Buddhist scriptures, but I don't mind you bringing up something of interest.
I have not much faith in ancient scriptures that came out at least 400 years after the Buddha.
Nobody is sure who are the people that inhabit the area around the Buddha.
But we can apply logic to deduce what are reasonably acceptable.
.
I have a portrait of the Buddha here.yes will post regarding how Buddha looked...He might have been blue eyed Iranian though..as he was a Shakya , many theorize Shakya and Saka are the same..but that link is very tenuous....he was considered conventionally very handsome...conventional handsome is Iranian/extreme North Indian for Northern Indians...moreover when he went to the court of one king (Ajatasahtru?) , the king could not distinguish him from other monks he had converted in the Bihar region, before an official pointed out the Buddha for him...There is enough circumstantial evidence that the Buddha was a handsome North Indian looking man
I have a portrait of the Buddha here.
After rationalizing about it my whole life, I am sure it is a good representation of the Buddha.
View attachment 422821
If you don't mind, I have had enough of the Buddha in this thread on India
.
Other than a self-composed diagram,
I dont see ANYTHING in that picture of urs that explicitly states tt Buddha was a vedic tribesmen. Morever, he was born in todays's nepal- not india and further still, he was the founder of buddhism, not hinduism.
Anyway, back to topic.
In the present day, only rationale nations who treat religion as a mere, philosphical way of living can strive to be a great nation.(u might have better luck during the feudal ages when empires n kingdoms go to war with 1 another over religion- n prayed that 'god' will grant then victory over their enemies. <== lolz)
No way can any nation whose ppl drink mere animal's urine as a tonic or use its excrement as a decoration for their houses ever become 1.
French...British. Hwah u seems proud of your european heritage. If so n then again, y intentionally choose to downplay the British Raj's contribution to the formation of India?
No British = no India
India was built on the backbone of British imperialism.
Undeniable.
To be a great country, you must crush people with tanks like great country China did and baniyas don't have guts to do that!!!
I have a portrait of the Buddha here.
After rationalizing about it my whole life, I am sure it is a good representation of the Buddha.
View attachment 422821
If you don't mind, I have had enough of the Buddha in this thread on India
.