How can Pakistan counter India’s ABM system?

[Basel]

You should read about Ballistic and cruise missiles.

Definition of Cruise missile. A missile completing its course on engine power all the way. (Engine never shuts down)

Definition of Ballistic missile . A missile traveling on Ballistic path using initial push by engines and earth's gravity (Engine shuts down after some time.)

I think you need to read about them instead of me because bold part just shows level of your knowledge.

 

[Pindi Boy]

 

[parkour guy]

View attachment 256366

Pakistan getting aip submarines from china..and a report said that these submarines would be brought to karachi and assembled there and pakistan would fit it's own weapons onto to...so it makes clear that pakistan has sophisticated sea launched ballistic or guides missiles that will be used onto submarines.

 

[Pindi Boy]

View attachment 256366

Pakistan getting aip submarines from china..and a report said that these submarines would be brought to karachi and assembled there and pakistan would fit it's own weapons onto to...so it makes clear that pakistan has sophisticated sea launched ballistic or guides missiles that will be used onto submarines.

i mean how will u defend our land from brahmos nirbhay and other

 

[amardeep mishra]

Aksah is India's first attempt on a SAM,and suddenly it becomes a tactical ABM.

Akash is not a tactical ABM for christ sake! It is as you correctly pointed out, India's first attempt at making a medium ranged SAM,and it shouldn't surprise that they tried to copy a proven design(or atleast parts of it)-SA6.
The guidance and control and control radar is entirely Indian dIndianigned right from DMPS(dual mode ferrite phase shifters) to TWT.
One of the requirements of ABM radar system is very high pulse repetition frequency- something that our rajendra lacks.Not to mention the fact that it's range is severely limited to just 100kms(after all it was designed more than 25 years back!). More recently designed Indian AESA radars have a range of 400kms against a 2m^2 RCS.
Lastly I'd like to point out that no country shares their painstaking research with any other country. For instance Russia never helped india overcome various types of Combustion instabilities that we were facing in the development of CE-12(India's first attempt at designing a cryogenic engine,circa 1987-gas generator cycle).
Umpteen number of problems crop up when one get down to design a system or even tinker it especially when that phenomenon is less known.

 

[shahriyar haq]

Ww

Akash is not a tactical ABM for christ sake! It is as you correctly pointed out, India's first attempt at making a medium ranged SAM,and it shouldn't surprise that they tried to copy a proven design(or atleast parts of it)-SA6.
The guidance and control and control radar is entirely Indian dIndianigned right from DMPS(dual mode ferrite phase shifters) to TWT.
One of the requirements of ABM radar system is very high pulse repetition frequency- something that our rajendra lacks.Not to mention the fact that it's range is severely limited to just 100kms(after all it was designed more than 25 years back!). More recently designed Indian AESA radars have a range of 400kms against a 2m^2 RCS.
Lastly I'd like to point out that no country shares their painstaking research with any other country. For instance Russia never helped india overcome various types of Combustion instabilities that we were facing in the development of CE-12(India's first attempt at designing a cryogenic engine,circa 1987-gas generator cycle).
Umpteen number of problems crop up when one get down to design a system or even tinker it especially when that phenomenon is less known.[/QUOTE

 

[amardeep mishra]

One major factor is the lack of an active seeker in akash, it'll find it extremely difficult to intercept targets at anything more than perhaps mach 3! One OnereThatsason why it can never be used in ABM role.
PAD/AAD/PDV on other hand have active seekers(IIR and RF) that coupled with a very advanced radar- swordfish can intercept IRBMs and ICBMs

 

[shahriyar haq]

Pakistan will likely work on a number of options viz;MIRVs,decoys,SLBMs,or a hypersonic missile vehicle.Regardless of what it posses out of these, it will certainly develope the capabilities to ensure deterrence stability. In my opinion,ABMs achievement is that it has further led to arms race by jeopardising strategic stability.

 

[zebra7]

One major factor is the lack of an active seeker in akash, it'll find it extremely difficult to intercept targets at anything more than perhaps mach 3! One OnereThatsason why it can never be used in ABM role.
PAD/AAD/PDV on other hand have active seekers(IIR and RF) that coupled with a very advanced radar- swordfish can intercept IRBMs and ICBMs

Good but Akash can be deployed in the lower level and to intercept cruise missile.
PAD/PDV don't you think its just a technology demostrator because it is using prithvi airframe.
Swordfish Radar how many have been bought and how many do you think is the requirement for the safegaurd of India and don't you think that they are just the targetting radar and not meant for the surveillance radar ?
When did PAD/AAD/PDV is operationally deployed ?

 

[Muhammad Jabran]

Great Informative

 

[ice_man]

what is the reaction time to of an ABM in a pakistan vs india scenario.

our land masses are joined unlike the soviet union and USA

 

[HRK]

 

[crictimw]

I think Pakistan should talk on table with India.

 

[ghazi52]

 

[asimnabeel0]

Indians have mastered the art of Farting without Fighting.