What's new

History of Tibet

it took chinese 1500 years to make cantonese as a dialect of chinese,
it is only 1000 years that vietnam was being a part of china, that's why we need 500 years more.

Bro, Cantonese were originally Chinese, and we don't need Korea and Vietnam, they don't belong to us.

Nor we want to waste our resources to feed some extra 150 million people.
 
Đảo Bạch Long Vỹ;1918915 said:
No, they are not forced to use and write Vietnamese. We know how to make them to volunteer learn Vietnamese for their better lives. So they are happy with it -> no problem.



Ya, great discovery :rofl: :rofl:
Vietnamese are ... Chinese :rofl: :rofl:

No, you are not Chinese. And please stop these history distortions that claim South China was your land.
 
eh,it's ridiculous to talk about our internal affairs with the vietnamese!!what qualifications do vietnam has to talk with China??:rofl:
 
Bro, Cantonese were originally Chinese, and we don't need Korea and Vietnam, they don't belong to us.

Nor we want to waste our resources to feed some extra 150 million people.

Chinese is 漢人 (?)
Cantonese is 粵人
Vietnamese is 越人
 
Tibet was as independent from China as their language is; which is primarily derived from Sanskrit. Tibet wasn't attacked by a foreign power or they themselves do not attacked China; even though PLA marched in to oppress them. That was an act of aggression and nothing else.

Now they (Hans) can claim how genuinely extended their borders are, no one cares.
 
Chinese is 漢人 (?)
Cantonese is 粵人
Vietnamese is 越人

粤人 is just a sub-ethnicity of 汉人, so learn the Chinese culture properly before commenting something stupid.
 
Tibet was as independent from China as their language is; which is primarily derived from Sanskrit. Tibet wasn't attacked by a foreign power or they themselves do not attacked China; even though PLA marched in to oppress them. That was an act of aggression and nothing else.

Now they (Hans) can claim how genuinely extended their borders are, no one cares.

Tibetans spoken the Tibeto-Burman language, not Indo-Aryan.

The connection that linked Tibet with the ancient India is Buddhism, and nothing else.

Whereas the Tibetans are closely related to the Han ethnicity in both genetic and language.
 
Tibet was as independent from China as their language is; which is primarily derived from Sanskrit. Tibet wasn't attacked by a foreign power or they themselves do not attacked China; even though PLA marched in to oppress them. That was an act of aggression and nothing else.

Now they (Hans) can claim how genuinely extended their borders are, no one cares.

Why Chinese army PLA attacked Tibet? We know that Tibet didn't harm China. And when Chinese marched into Tibet before it was annexed by China?
 
Chinese is 漢人 (?)
Cantonese is 粵人
Vietnamese is 越人

Complete bullcrap. Cantonese is a sub group of the Han, not a seperate entity. Only retarded Vietnamese with little knowledge would think so.
 
Tibetans spoken the Tibeto-Burman language, not Indo-Aryan.

The connection that linked Tibet with the ancient India is Buddhism, and nothing else.

Whereas the Tibetans are closely related to the Han ethnicity in both genetic and language.

Do not go by the classifications made by some Westerner. There are many theories, and the one you are saying has been feed into every one's brain for many good reasons.
Go and compared Hindi/Punjabi alphabet chart with Tibetan chart, you will get the answer.
 
Do not go by the classifications made by some Westerner. There are many theories, and the one you are saying has been feed into every one's brain for many good reasons.
Go and compared Hindi/Punjabi alphabet chart with Tibetan chart, you will get the answer.

Tibetan is East Asian, not South Asian. And you have to respect this fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom