SledgeHammer
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 491
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
I read your arguments. I do not want religion sanctioned killing for any creature and you were arguing how it is immoral and illegal to kill for religion.
???? When? Where?
I know the judgement is legally controversial but it will initiate a debate which is much needed.
That's what we are doing here. A court should not act as a moral police, no matter how noble or valid the cause may be. A court is there only to uphold the sanctity of existing laws made by the law makers.
Bengalis come in because everywhere there is regression you can see them supporting it.
You have any example to support your racist claim? As far as I know, most of the reforms in Hinduism in modern times came from Bengal, be it banning Satidaha or supporting widow marriages, Bengal is also far less caste sensitive than many parts of India. But we are not discussing "Bengalis" here, so you can keep your racism with you.
Be it someone objecting against UCC on the grounds of minority appeasement or shielding TMC govt from terrorism charges or talking against Hindus. The community as a whole are anti-Hindus.
Who is shielding TMC govt from terrorism charges? And the community as a whole are against the RSS brand of Hinduism, and rightly & proudly so. You have a problem with that, then learn to live with it.