Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
I am not much of a 'religious' kind, hence, not much worried about the religious part of the ban, but if we try to be logical on this issue, then certain questions come up:
1. Are those animals that are being sacrificed in the temples are endangered or protected species, thus illegal to kill?
- The answer is NO.
2. Are those animals are also being killed in India for human consumption?
- The answer is YES.
3. Is animal sacrifice prohibited in Hinduism?
- The answer is NO.
4. Are the temple owners/administrators free to decide how they want to do the puja path, and what to offer to gods, as per their tradition & beliefs?
- The answer is YES.
5. Are the protestors free to go to any other temple where animal sacrifice is not the tradition?
- The answer is YES.
6. Was the court acted in a biased manner when it banned animal sacrifice for one particular religious group?
- The answer is YES.
Then how the court came to the conclusion that animal sacrifice or offering meat to gods is illegal when the same meat is being consumed by many Indians all over the country, legally?
If killing animal is brutality, then killing them for human consumption is also brutality, should we ban all non-veg food next? Can we stretch that argument for living plants also?
---- To all Indians who are supporting this judgement.
@Bang Galore @utraash @SarthakGanguly @Dem!god
Didn't support the HC judgment per se. More a general principle. All animal sacrifices needs to be banned. Slaughter should only happen in abattoirs preferably. People shouldn't be allowed to run around chopping of heads or cutting throats of animals just because they want to or because their ancestors ages ago, did so.